Does Routine Post-Operative Use of Drainage in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery Offer Better Results?

Alexandros Moniakis MD, MSc, Niels Pacheco-Barrios MSc, Esteban Quiceno MD, Amna Hussein MD, Annie Pico MS, Ebtesam Abdulla MD, Isabel L. Bauer MS, Kristin Nosova MD, Monis Ahmed Khan MD, Dara S. Farhadi MD, Michael Prim MD, Ali Baaj MD
{"title":"Does Routine Post-Operative Use of Drainage in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery Offer Better Results?","authors":"Alexandros Moniakis MD, MSc, Niels Pacheco-Barrios MSc, Esteban Quiceno MD, Amna Hussein MD, Annie Pico MS, Ebtesam Abdulla MD, Isabel L. Bauer MS, Kristin Nosova MD, Monis Ahmed Khan MD, Dara S. Farhadi MD, Michael Prim MD, Ali Baaj MD","doi":"10.18502/jsp.v3i2.14802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) in lumbar degenerative diseases have been well described (less tissue damage, shorter hospital stay, better results in pain assessment). One aspect that has not yet been studied enough is the usage of a post-operative drain in MISS. The aim of this study was to determine whether drainage in MISS is necessary or not and what advantages or disadvantages its use offers. \nMaterials - Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the published literature, searching articles published on Pubmed and Embasse until December 1st 2022, regarding MISS in the lumbar region and post-operative drain usage. Our inclusion criteria were original articles written in English and articles using minimally invasive techniques (usage of tubular retractors along with an endoscope or microscope, paramedian incision, percutaneous screw placement). 42 articles were assessed, and after careful examination and duplication exclusion, 26 research papers were included. Usage, type and duration of postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, ambulation time and complications were extracted, and relevant results were pooled. \nResults: The majority of the included articles (80.7 %) reported using a negative-pressure post-operative drain tube. Drains were removed either 48 hours after surgery or when the drainage volume was less than 50ml/24h. Hospital stays and time to ambulation were shorter in cases where drainage was not used. There was no difference in complications between cases where drainage was used and those that it was not. \nConclusion: The rationale behind post-operative drainage in MISS is to protect from surgical site infections and hematoma creation. Based on our study there is no evidence to support this hypothesis. On the contrary, our results suggest that the drawbacks of using a drain (pain, discomfort, anxiety, inconvenience of mobilisation, prolongation of hospitalisation) outweigh the advantages, thus making the routine use of postoperative drainage in MISS unnecessary.","PeriodicalId":199836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","volume":"16 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jsp.v3i2.14802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) in lumbar degenerative diseases have been well described (less tissue damage, shorter hospital stay, better results in pain assessment). One aspect that has not yet been studied enough is the usage of a post-operative drain in MISS. The aim of this study was to determine whether drainage in MISS is necessary or not and what advantages or disadvantages its use offers. Materials - Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the published literature, searching articles published on Pubmed and Embasse until December 1st 2022, regarding MISS in the lumbar region and post-operative drain usage. Our inclusion criteria were original articles written in English and articles using minimally invasive techniques (usage of tubular retractors along with an endoscope or microscope, paramedian incision, percutaneous screw placement). 42 articles were assessed, and after careful examination and duplication exclusion, 26 research papers were included. Usage, type and duration of postoperative drainage, length of hospital stay, ambulation time and complications were extracted, and relevant results were pooled. Results: The majority of the included articles (80.7 %) reported using a negative-pressure post-operative drain tube. Drains were removed either 48 hours after surgery or when the drainage volume was less than 50ml/24h. Hospital stays and time to ambulation were shorter in cases where drainage was not used. There was no difference in complications between cases where drainage was used and those that it was not. Conclusion: The rationale behind post-operative drainage in MISS is to protect from surgical site infections and hematoma creation. Based on our study there is no evidence to support this hypothesis. On the contrary, our results suggest that the drawbacks of using a drain (pain, discomfort, anxiety, inconvenience of mobilisation, prolongation of hospitalisation) outweigh the advantages, thus making the routine use of postoperative drainage in MISS unnecessary.
微创腰椎手术术后常规引流是否能带来更好的效果?
目的:微创脊柱手术(MISS)在治疗腰椎退行性疾病方面的优势(组织损伤更小、住院时间更短、疼痛评估结果更好)已被充分描述。目前尚未对微创手术中术后引流管的使用进行充分研究。本研究的目的是确定在 MISS 中是否有必要使用引流管,以及使用引流管的优缺点。材料-方法:我们对已发表的文献进行了系统性回顾,搜索了截至 2022 年 12 月 1 日在 Pubmed 和 Embasse 上发表的有关腰部 MISS 和术后引流管使用的文章。我们的纳入标准是以英语撰写的原创文章和使用微创技术的文章(使用管状牵引器和内窥镜或显微镜、耻骨旁切口、经皮螺钉置入)。共对 42 篇文章进行了评估,经过仔细检查并排除重复内容后,26 篇研究论文被纳入其中。研究人员提取了使用情况、术后引流类型和持续时间、住院时间、行走时间和并发症,并对相关结果进行了汇总。结果:大部分被纳入的文章(80.7%)报告了术后负压引流管的使用情况。引流管在术后48小时或引流量少于50毫升/24小时时拔除。不使用引流管的病例住院时间和下床活动时间较短。使用引流管和不使用引流管的病例在并发症方面没有差异。结论:MISS 术后引流的基本原理是防止手术部位感染和血肿形成。根据我们的研究,没有证据支持这一假设。相反,我们的研究结果表明,使用引流管的缺点(疼痛、不适、焦虑、活动不便、住院时间延长)大于优点,因此没有必要在 MISS 中常规使用术后引流管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信