The temptation of Occam’s Razor: jurisdiction, admissibility and party autonomy

Q3 Social Sciences

Arbitration International Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1093/arbint/aiae019

Ada Yee Lam Leung, Samuel Yee Ching Leung

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the implementation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration in 1985, its jurisprudence has been developed in a broad array of aspects amongst which is the distinction between jurisdiction and admissibility. It has been said that the distinction is a useful tool in adjudicating the issue of whether an arbitral award should be set aside by a domestic court—but is it necessarily so? In C v D (2023) 26 HKCFAR 216, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal had the opportunity to revisit the usefulness of the distinction. Given that the Court was divided on the issue, C v D not only provides two lines of thought for the international arbitration community to reflect on the distinction between jurisdiction and admissibility but also provides a reference for Model Law jurisdictions in deciding future cases.

查看原文本刊更多论文

奥卡姆剃刀的诱惑：管辖权、可受理性和当事人意思自治

自 1985 年实施《贸易法委员会国际商事仲裁示范法》以来，其判例在广泛的方面得到了发展，其中包括管辖权和可受理性之间的区别。有人说，在裁决国内法院是否应撤销仲裁裁决的问题时，这种区别是一种有用的工具，但是否一定如此呢？在 C v D (2023) 26 HKCFAR 216 一案中，香港终审法院有机会重新审视这一区别是否有用。鉴于法院在这一问题上存在分歧，C v D 一案不仅为国际仲裁界提供了两条思路来反思管辖权和可受理性之间的区别，而且为《示范法》司法管辖区今后裁决案件提供了参考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Arbitration International Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Launched in 1985, Arbitration International provides quarterly coverage for national and international developments in the world of arbitration. The journal aims to maintain balance between academic debate and practical contributions to the field, providing both topical material on current developments and analytic scholarship of permanent interest. Arbitrators, counsel, judges, scholars and government officials will find the journal enhances their understanding of a broad range of topics in commercial and investment arbitration. Features include (i) articles covering all major arbitration rules and national jurisdictions written by respected international practitioners and scholars, (ii) cutting edge (case) notes covering recent developments and ongoing debates in the field, (iii) book reviews of the latest publications in the world of arbitration, (iv) Letters to the Editor and (v) agora grouping articles related to a common theme. Arbitration International maintains a balance between controversial subjects for debate and topics geared toward practical use by arbitrators, lawyers, academics, judges, corporate advisors and government officials.