The effect of intrathecal pethidine on Post-Spinal anesthesia shivering after cesarean section: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis

Muhammad Afzal, Amber Lee, Muhammad Asad, Alya Ali, A. Farrukh, Bader Semakieh, Yaxel Levin-Carrión, Shah Rukh Shah, Q. Khan
{"title":"The effect of intrathecal pethidine on Post-Spinal anesthesia shivering after cesarean section: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Muhammad Afzal, Amber Lee, Muhammad Asad, Alya Ali, A. Farrukh, Bader Semakieh, Yaxel Levin-Carrión, Shah Rukh Shah, Q. Khan","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Spinal anesthesia is the most preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). This meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect low and high intrathecal doses of pethidine on the maternal outcomes after C-section.\n \n \n \n A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to derive odds ratios (ORs) from dichotomous data.\n \n \n \n Seventeen randomized controlled trials with 1,304 C-section patients were included. Patients who had received intrathecal pethidine experienced decreased shivering and intensity of shivering (OR 0.13; P<0.001) and (OR 0.21; P<0.001), respectively. Moreover, vomiting (OR 2.47; P=0.002) and pruritus (OR 5.92; P<0.001) were significantly higher in the pethidine group. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of nausea (OR 2.55; P=0.06) and hypotension (OR 0.91; P=0.67).\n \n \n \n Intrathecal pethidine can effectively decrease shivering, though it increases the risk of vomiting and pruritus. No significant difference was found both in the maternal hypotension and nausea.\n","PeriodicalId":503882,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine &amp; Surgery","volume":"31 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine &amp; Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia is the most preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). This meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect low and high intrathecal doses of pethidine on the maternal outcomes after C-section. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to derive odds ratios (ORs) from dichotomous data. Seventeen randomized controlled trials with 1,304 C-section patients were included. Patients who had received intrathecal pethidine experienced decreased shivering and intensity of shivering (OR 0.13; P<0.001) and (OR 0.21; P<0.001), respectively. Moreover, vomiting (OR 2.47; P=0.002) and pruritus (OR 5.92; P<0.001) were significantly higher in the pethidine group. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of nausea (OR 2.55; P=0.06) and hypotension (OR 0.91; P=0.67). Intrathecal pethidine can effectively decrease shivering, though it increases the risk of vomiting and pruritus. No significant difference was found both in the maternal hypotension and nausea.
鞘内注射哌替啶对剖宫产术后椎管内麻醉后颤抖的影响:系统综述与元分析
脊髓麻醉是剖腹产(C-section)的首选方法。本荟萃分析旨在确定低剂量和高剂量鞘内注射哌替啶对剖腹产术后产妇预后的影响。 研究人员对 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统检索。采用随机效应荟萃分析法从二分法数据中得出几率比(OR)。 17项随机对照试验共纳入了1304名剖腹产患者。接受鞘内哌替啶治疗的患者颤抖和颤抖强度分别降低(OR 0.13;P<0.001)和(OR 0.21;P<0.001)。此外,哌替啶组的呕吐率(OR 2.47;P=0.002)和瘙痒率(OR 5.92;P<0.001)明显更高。恶心(OR 2.55;P=0.06)和低血压(OR 0.91;P=0.67)的发生率没有明显的统计学差异。 鞘内哌替啶可有效减少颤抖,但会增加呕吐和瘙痒的风险。在产妇低血压和恶心方面没有发现明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信