Visualizing thyroid health: a pictorial journey through 2017 ACR TI-RADS and common thyroid pathologies

Prajwal Dahal, Sabina Parajuli, Prajina Pradhan
{"title":"Visualizing thyroid health: a pictorial journey through 2017 ACR TI-RADS and common thyroid pathologies","authors":"Prajwal Dahal, Sabina Parajuli, Prajina Pradhan","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS), more thyroid nodules are being detected than ever before, and they are being identified at an earlier stage. It poses a challenge for radiologists and clinicians in deciding what to do next. Most nodules are benign and require no follow up and intervention. Even highly suspicious nodules can be followed up, if the size is small. Variations in HRUS interpretation among radiologists are common, with frequent misidentifications between spongiform and solid cystic lesions, hypoechoic and very hypoechoic nodules, and microcalcification and hyperechoic foci with comet tail artifacts. Cystic lesions with echogenic contents are often confused with solid nodules, cystic papillary carcinoma thyroid is often confused with colloid cysts. The 2017 ACR TI-RADS (American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) aims to standardize the interpretation of thyroid nodules and guide further management. Rather than giving specific diagnosis like colloid cyst, adenomatous nodule and papillary carcinoma; ACR TI-RADS classifies nodules from TI-RADS 1 to TI-RADS 5 based on HRUS characteristics and recommends further management. What we often read are textual contents that are theoretical, and in practice, we get confused while interpreting the characteristics of thyroid nodules. This review offers a detailed visual overview of the 2017 ACR TI-RADS and common thyroid conditions, explaining key features through imaging data and examples for consistent interpretation. Combining textual explanations with visual aids, this article provides practical guidance for interpreting thyroid nodules for radiologists, and clinicians seeking a clear understanding of thyroid imaging and pathology.","PeriodicalId":503882,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","volume":"36 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advent of high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS), more thyroid nodules are being detected than ever before, and they are being identified at an earlier stage. It poses a challenge for radiologists and clinicians in deciding what to do next. Most nodules are benign and require no follow up and intervention. Even highly suspicious nodules can be followed up, if the size is small. Variations in HRUS interpretation among radiologists are common, with frequent misidentifications between spongiform and solid cystic lesions, hypoechoic and very hypoechoic nodules, and microcalcification and hyperechoic foci with comet tail artifacts. Cystic lesions with echogenic contents are often confused with solid nodules, cystic papillary carcinoma thyroid is often confused with colloid cysts. The 2017 ACR TI-RADS (American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) aims to standardize the interpretation of thyroid nodules and guide further management. Rather than giving specific diagnosis like colloid cyst, adenomatous nodule and papillary carcinoma; ACR TI-RADS classifies nodules from TI-RADS 1 to TI-RADS 5 based on HRUS characteristics and recommends further management. What we often read are textual contents that are theoretical, and in practice, we get confused while interpreting the characteristics of thyroid nodules. This review offers a detailed visual overview of the 2017 ACR TI-RADS and common thyroid conditions, explaining key features through imaging data and examples for consistent interpretation. Combining textual explanations with visual aids, this article provides practical guidance for interpreting thyroid nodules for radiologists, and clinicians seeking a clear understanding of thyroid imaging and pathology.
甲状腺健康可视化:2017 ACR TI-RADS 和常见甲状腺病变的图解之旅
随着高分辨率超声成像(HRUS)技术的出现,甲状腺结节的检出率比以往任何时候都要高,而且这些结节被发现的时间也越来越早。这给放射科医生和临床医生决定下一步该怎么做带来了挑战。大多数结节是良性的,无需随访和干预。即使是高度可疑的结节,如果体积较小,也可以进行随访。放射科医生对 HRUS 的判读常有差异,海绵状和实性囊性病变、低回声和极低回声结节、微钙化和伴有彗尾伪影的高回声病灶之间经常出现误判。有回声内容物的囊性病变常与实性结节混淆,甲状腺囊性乳头状癌常与胶样囊肿混淆。2017年ACR TI-RADS(美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统)旨在规范甲状腺结节的解释并指导进一步的治疗。ACR TI-RADS没有给出胶样囊肿、腺瘤性结节和乳头状癌等具体诊断,而是根据HRUS特征将结节分为TI-RADS 1至TI-RADS 5级,并建议进一步处理。我们经常读到的都是理论性的文字内容,而在实际操作中,我们在解读甲状腺结节的特征时会感到困惑。本综述对2017 ACR TI-RADS和常见甲状腺疾病进行了详细的直观概述,通过影像学数据和实例解释关键特征,以达到解释的一致性。本文将文字解释与直观教具相结合,为放射科医生解读甲状腺结节提供了实用指导,也为临床医生寻求对甲状腺影像和病理的清晰认识提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信