Vincenzo Bianco, F. Cascetta, Sergio Nardini, R. E. Plomitallo
{"title":"An Italian case study of life cycle assessment for a drinking water dispenser","authors":"Vincenzo Bianco, F. Cascetta, Sergio Nardini, R. E. Plomitallo","doi":"10.1177/0958305x241266537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this article is the comparison of global warming potential, estimated according to IPCC 2013 methodology, between bottled water and a drinking water dispenser made of pine wood. The functional unit is 1 L of water. Two cases are considered: in the first case is considered 1 L of refrigerated water supplied by a water dispenser, in the second case, it is also considered how users come back home with their water. The global warming potential for bottled water packed in polyethylene terephthalate is taken by literature, its average value is equal to 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L. In the first case, the water dispenser has a global warming potential value equal to 6.89 × 10−2 kg CO2 eq./L, the percentage difference between bottled water and water dispenser is about 43% in 100 years. In the end, a comparison of vehicles used by users to come back home is performed. The comparison shows that the use of bikes has a lower impact than cars.","PeriodicalId":505265,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x241266537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The goal of this article is the comparison of global warming potential, estimated according to IPCC 2013 methodology, between bottled water and a drinking water dispenser made of pine wood. The functional unit is 1 L of water. Two cases are considered: in the first case is considered 1 L of refrigerated water supplied by a water dispenser, in the second case, it is also considered how users come back home with their water. The global warming potential for bottled water packed in polyethylene terephthalate is taken by literature, its average value is equal to 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L. In the first case, the water dispenser has a global warming potential value equal to 6.89 × 10−2 kg CO2 eq./L, the percentage difference between bottled water and water dispenser is about 43% in 100 years. In the end, a comparison of vehicles used by users to come back home is performed. The comparison shows that the use of bikes has a lower impact than cars.
本文的目的是比较瓶装水和松木饮水机的全球升温潜能值(根据 IPCC 2013 方法估算)。功能单位为 1 升水。本文考虑了两种情况:第一种情况是饮水机供应 1 升冷藏水,第二种情况是用户如何将水带回家。聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯瓶装水的全球变暖潜势是根据文献得出的,其平均值等于 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L。在第一种情况下,饮水机的全球变暖潜势值等于 6.89 × 10-2 kg CO2 eq./L,100 年内瓶装水和饮水机的百分比差异约为 43%。最后,对用户回家时使用的交通工具进行了比较。比较结果表明,使用自行车的影响低于汽车。