A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a blue light device for the treatment of chronic back pain

Ralf Baron, Bart Morlion, Albert Dahan, Michael Überall, Golo von Basum, Imane Wild
{"title":"A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a blue light device for the treatment of chronic back pain","authors":"Ralf Baron, Bart Morlion, Albert Dahan, Michael Überall, Golo von Basum, Imane Wild","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1444401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic back pain is one of the most prevalent conditions and has a large socio-economic impact. The lack of routine use of non-pharmacological options and issues associated with pharmacological treatments underscore high unmet needs in the treatment of back pain. Although blue light phototherapy has proven efficacy in dermatology, limited information is available about its use in back pain.In this proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial, a pain relief patch (PRP) delivered blue light at the site of back pain for 30 min during five treatment sessions. The comparator device delivered green light for 5 s but was worn for 30 min. A follow-up visit took place after the last treatment. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of treatment by PRP, compared to the control device, in reducing pain intensity at the end of the treatment period. The post-treatment visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity score for each group was calculated across the five treatment sessions and compared to the baseline. Secondary objectives included the disability score (Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire) and safety.The full analysis set included 171 patients. A statistically significant reduction in pain intensity occurred after the use of PRP (p < 0.02), but the study did not meet its primary objective of a superiority trial aimed at demonstrating a 0.6 cm difference in favor of PRP on the VAS scale. There was no significant change in the disability scores. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify the treatment response by patient characteristics such as pain intensity at baseline and skin type. As expected, safety data showed erythema and skin discoloration in the PRP group but not in the control group.This trial had multiple limitations that need to be addressed in future research. Although the primary objective was not achieved, this proof-of-concept study provides important efficacy and safety data in relation to the use of blue light in the treatment of chronic back pain and key insights that may support further research on similar devices.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01528332.","PeriodicalId":12641,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pain Research","volume":"32 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1444401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic back pain is one of the most prevalent conditions and has a large socio-economic impact. The lack of routine use of non-pharmacological options and issues associated with pharmacological treatments underscore high unmet needs in the treatment of back pain. Although blue light phototherapy has proven efficacy in dermatology, limited information is available about its use in back pain.In this proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial, a pain relief patch (PRP) delivered blue light at the site of back pain for 30 min during five treatment sessions. The comparator device delivered green light for 5 s but was worn for 30 min. A follow-up visit took place after the last treatment. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of treatment by PRP, compared to the control device, in reducing pain intensity at the end of the treatment period. The post-treatment visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity score for each group was calculated across the five treatment sessions and compared to the baseline. Secondary objectives included the disability score (Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire) and safety.The full analysis set included 171 patients. A statistically significant reduction in pain intensity occurred after the use of PRP (p < 0.02), but the study did not meet its primary objective of a superiority trial aimed at demonstrating a 0.6 cm difference in favor of PRP on the VAS scale. There was no significant change in the disability scores. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify the treatment response by patient characteristics such as pain intensity at baseline and skin type. As expected, safety data showed erythema and skin discoloration in the PRP group but not in the control group.This trial had multiple limitations that need to be addressed in future research. Although the primary objective was not achieved, this proof-of-concept study provides important efficacy and safety data in relation to the use of blue light in the treatment of chronic back pain and key insights that may support further research on similar devices.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01528332.
一项前瞻性、随机对照、双盲、多中心研究,旨在评估蓝光设备治疗慢性背痛的疗效和安全性
慢性背痛是最常见的疾病之一,对社会经济影响巨大。非药物治疗方法缺乏常规使用,药物治疗又存在相关问题,这些都凸显了治疗背痛的大量需求尚未得到满足。在这项概念验证随机对照试验中,镇痛贴片(PRP)在五个治疗疗程中向背痛部位照射蓝光 30 分钟。对比设备发出绿光的时间为 5 秒,但佩戴时间为 30 分钟。最后一次治疗后进行随访。主要目的是证明与对照设备相比,PRP 治疗在治疗期结束后降低疼痛强度方面更具优势。计算每个组在五个疗程中的治疗后视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛强度评分,并与基线进行比较。次要目标包括残疾评分(罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷)和安全性。使用 PRP 后,疼痛强度有了统计学意义上的明显降低(p < 0.02),但该研究并未达到其首要目标,即在 VAS 量表上证明 PRP 的优势为 0.6 厘米。残疾评分没有明显变化。研究人员进行了分组分析,以根据基线疼痛强度和皮肤类型等患者特征确定治疗反应。正如预期的那样,安全性数据显示 PRP 组出现了红斑和皮肤变色,而对照组则没有。虽然没有达到主要目标,但这项概念验证研究提供了有关使用蓝光治疗慢性背痛的重要疗效和安全性数据,以及可能支持类似设备进一步研究的关键见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信