Test-Optional Policies: Impacts to Date and Recommendations for Equity in Admissions

Reginald M. Gooch, Vinetha K. Belur, Sara B. Haviland, Ou Lydia Liu
{"title":"Test-Optional Policies: Impacts to Date and Recommendations for Equity in Admissions","authors":"Reginald M. Gooch, Vinetha K. Belur, Sara B. Haviland, Ou Lydia Liu","doi":"10.33009/fsop_jpss135721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many institutions were forced by the COVID-19 pandemic to change admissions policies as a response to logistical challenges around testing. However, even as logistical challenges have resolved, pandemic-era changes to higher education testing policies which reduced or eliminated testing requirements have remained in place in many schools. Now, research evidence is beginning to emerge which looks at the effects that reductions to testing requirements are having on undergraduate admissions, making it possible to determine whether those policies are meeting their goals. This review examines the empirical evidence that has been gathered to date to identify trends in the effects of these testing policies and to make recommendations for increasing equity in admissions that institutions may wish to consider as they grapple with another change in higher education admissions: the striking down of race-conscious admissions. We find that test-optional admissions do not benefit equity in all cases, but that some contexts show more promise than others.","PeriodicalId":477179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of postsecondary student success","volume":"85 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of postsecondary student success","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss135721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many institutions were forced by the COVID-19 pandemic to change admissions policies as a response to logistical challenges around testing. However, even as logistical challenges have resolved, pandemic-era changes to higher education testing policies which reduced or eliminated testing requirements have remained in place in many schools. Now, research evidence is beginning to emerge which looks at the effects that reductions to testing requirements are having on undergraduate admissions, making it possible to determine whether those policies are meeting their goals. This review examines the empirical evidence that has been gathered to date to identify trends in the effects of these testing policies and to make recommendations for increasing equity in admissions that institutions may wish to consider as they grapple with another change in higher education admissions: the striking down of race-conscious admissions. We find that test-optional admissions do not benefit equity in all cases, but that some contexts show more promise than others.
考试选择政策:迄今为止的影响和对招生公平的建议
COVID-19 大流行迫使许多院校改变招生政策,以应对测试方面的后勤挑战。然而,即使后勤方面的挑战已经解决,许多学校仍然保留着大流行病时期对高等教育考试政策的修改,减少或取消了考试要求。现在,研究证据开始出现,这些证据考察了降低考试要求对本科生录取的影响,从而可以确定这些政策是否实现了它们的目标。本综述对迄今为止收集到的经验证据进行了研究,以确定这些考试政策的影响趋势,并就如何提高录取的公平性提出建议。我们发现,考试选拔录取并非在所有情况下都有利于公平,但在某些情况下比在其他情况下更有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信