Belief-based denial of contraception and abortion care in Canada: A scoping review

Anvita Dixit, Dipesh Suvarna, Joyce Arthur, Angel M. Foster
{"title":"Belief-based denial of contraception and abortion care in Canada: A scoping review","authors":"Anvita Dixit, Dipesh Suvarna, Joyce Arthur, Angel M. Foster","doi":"10.3138/cjhs-2023-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although contraception and abortion are considered medically necessary services, providers in Canada are permitted to deny services and referrals on the basis of their personal beliefs or conscience. Belief-based denial, sometimes referred to as “conscientious objection,” remains a controversial issue leading to barriers to access and provision of care. We carried out a scoping review to explore what is currently known about the belief-based denial of contraception and abortion care in Canada. We used a predefined framework to search for relevant sources and found a total of 97 articles including 27 peer-reviewed articles, 47 media articles, and 23 articles from reproductive health organizations, published since 1990. The literature we found shows that policy has been a key area of discussion; sources also focus on conceptually defining belief-based denial and advocacy efforts for reproductive rights. There is a stark lack of peer-reviewed literature documenting and examining the impact of belief-based denial of contraception and abortion care on those denied care in Canada.","PeriodicalId":506318,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","volume":"108 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs-2023-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although contraception and abortion are considered medically necessary services, providers in Canada are permitted to deny services and referrals on the basis of their personal beliefs or conscience. Belief-based denial, sometimes referred to as “conscientious objection,” remains a controversial issue leading to barriers to access and provision of care. We carried out a scoping review to explore what is currently known about the belief-based denial of contraception and abortion care in Canada. We used a predefined framework to search for relevant sources and found a total of 97 articles including 27 peer-reviewed articles, 47 media articles, and 23 articles from reproductive health organizations, published since 1990. The literature we found shows that policy has been a key area of discussion; sources also focus on conceptually defining belief-based denial and advocacy efforts for reproductive rights. There is a stark lack of peer-reviewed literature documenting and examining the impact of belief-based denial of contraception and abortion care on those denied care in Canada.
加拿大基于信仰而拒绝提供避孕和堕胎护理:范围审查
尽管避孕和堕胎被认为是医疗必需服务,但加拿大允许医疗服务提供者基于个人信仰或良心拒绝提供服务和转诊。基于信仰的拒绝,有时也被称为 "良心拒绝",仍然是一个有争议的问题,导致在获取和提供医疗服务方面存在障碍。我们进行了一次范围界定审查,以探索目前对加拿大基于信仰拒绝避孕和堕胎护理的了解。我们使用预先定义的框架来搜索相关资料,共找到了自 1990 年以来发表的 97 篇文章,其中包括 27 篇同行评审文章、47 篇媒体文章和 23 篇来自生殖健康组织的文章。我们发现的文献表明,政策一直是讨论的一个关键领域;资料来源还侧重于从概念上界定基于信仰的否定和倡导生殖权利的努力。在加拿大,记录和研究基于信仰拒绝提供避孕和堕胎护理对被拒绝者的影响的同行评审文献非常缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信