Spray Deposition and Losses to Soil from a Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Airblast Sprayer on Coffee

J. P. A. R. Cunha, L. D. L. Lopes, Caio Oliveira Rodrigues Alves, C. B. Alvarenga
{"title":"Spray Deposition and Losses to Soil from a Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Airblast Sprayer on Coffee","authors":"J. P. A. R. Cunha, L. D. L. Lopes, Caio Oliveira Rodrigues Alves, C. B. Alvarenga","doi":"10.3390/agriengineering6030139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs) have been increasingly used for crop protection in coffee plantations. However, the applications can result in low spray deposition on leaves and higher product losses between rows compared to ground airblast sprayers. This study aimed to evaluate the spray deposition on the coffee canopy and potential losses to the soil during application with an RPA and an airblast sprayer at varying spray volumes. The experiment comprised four spray treatments: RPA at 10 L ha−1 and 20 L ha−1, and airblast sprayer at 200 L ha−1 and 300 L ha−1. Leaf deposition was quantified by measuring a tracer on leaves from the lower and upper parts of the coffee canopy using spectrophotometry. Spray losses to the soil were measured by analyzing tracer residues on Petri dishes positioned within the inter-rows and beneath the coffee canopy. Statistical process control was used to analyze spray deposition quality in the study area. Ground-based airblast spraying resulted in the highest overall canopy deposition, while RPA spraying led to greater losses within the inter-rows. No significant difference was observed in spray runoff beneath the canopy between ground-based and aerial applications. Leaf deposition exhibited random variability across all application methods. Therefore, application stability, control, and spray quality standards were maintained.","PeriodicalId":505370,"journal":{"name":"AgriEngineering","volume":"92 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriEngineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6030139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs) have been increasingly used for crop protection in coffee plantations. However, the applications can result in low spray deposition on leaves and higher product losses between rows compared to ground airblast sprayers. This study aimed to evaluate the spray deposition on the coffee canopy and potential losses to the soil during application with an RPA and an airblast sprayer at varying spray volumes. The experiment comprised four spray treatments: RPA at 10 L ha−1 and 20 L ha−1, and airblast sprayer at 200 L ha−1 and 300 L ha−1. Leaf deposition was quantified by measuring a tracer on leaves from the lower and upper parts of the coffee canopy using spectrophotometry. Spray losses to the soil were measured by analyzing tracer residues on Petri dishes positioned within the inter-rows and beneath the coffee canopy. Statistical process control was used to analyze spray deposition quality in the study area. Ground-based airblast spraying resulted in the highest overall canopy deposition, while RPA spraying led to greater losses within the inter-rows. No significant difference was observed in spray runoff beneath the canopy between ground-based and aerial applications. Leaf deposition exhibited random variability across all application methods. Therefore, application stability, control, and spray quality standards were maintained.
遥控飞机和喷气式喷雾器在咖啡上的喷雾沉积和对土壤的损耗
遥控飞机(RPA)越来越多地用于咖啡种植园的作物保护。然而,与地面喷气式喷雾器相比,喷洒在叶片上的沉积物较少,行间的产品损失较高。本研究旨在评估使用 RPA 和喷气式喷雾器在不同喷洒量下喷洒农药时,农药在咖啡树冠上的沉积情况以及可能对土壤造成的损失。实验包括四种喷洒处理:RPA 的喷洒量为 10 升/公顷-1 和 20 升/公顷-1,喷气式喷雾器的喷洒量为 200 升/公顷-1 和 300 升/公顷-1。通过分光光度法测量咖啡树冠下部和上部叶片上的示踪剂,对叶片沉积进行量化。通过分析放置在行间和咖啡树冠下的培养皿上的示踪剂残留物,测量了喷洒到土壤中的损失。统计过程控制用于分析研究区域的喷雾沉积质量。地面喷洒导致冠层总体沉积量最大,而 RPA 喷洒则导致行间损失更大。在树冠下的喷雾径流方面,地面喷洒和空中喷洒没有明显差异。在所有施药方法中,叶片沉积都表现出随机变化性。因此,施药的稳定性、控制和喷雾质量标准都得到了保持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信