How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?

Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.3390/su16156296
Xuemei Zhang, Haodong Zheng, Tao Hang, Qiang Meng
{"title":"How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?","authors":"Xuemei Zhang, Haodong Zheng, Tao Hang, Qiang Meng","doi":"10.3390/su16156296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enterprises adopting a circular economy approach can effectively solve the severe situation of resources and the environment, and recycling is considered an effective means to solve environmental issues. Simultaneously, blockchain technology (BT) has been used to enhance product quality trust. However, there is limited literature on how to choose between monopolistic and competitive recycling modes by considering BT. This paper uses a game involving a manufacturer, a retailer, and a third-party recycler (TPR) in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). The retailer can recycle on itself and compete with the TPR for recycling used products. The results show that BT adoption could increase the recycling rate and demand for remanufactured products. BT benefits the firms in the CLSC when they control usage costs, regardless of whether competitive recycling mode is used or not. In addition, whether BT is adopted or not, CLSC firms prefer competitive recycling mode only when the competitive intensity exceeds a specific threshold. Moreover, choosing an appropriate recycling mode can alleviate the negative impact of BT on the environment, then an all-win result can be obtained for CLSC firms, consumers, and society. These results can give suggestions for managers to optimize their supply chains regarding adopting BT and implementing recycling mode. In the future, we can expand our research on the transfer price of used products, the positive and negative effects of BT, and BT cost-sharing strategies.","PeriodicalId":509360,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability","volume":"133 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enterprises adopting a circular economy approach can effectively solve the severe situation of resources and the environment, and recycling is considered an effective means to solve environmental issues. Simultaneously, blockchain technology (BT) has been used to enhance product quality trust. However, there is limited literature on how to choose between monopolistic and competitive recycling modes by considering BT. This paper uses a game involving a manufacturer, a retailer, and a third-party recycler (TPR) in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). The retailer can recycle on itself and compete with the TPR for recycling used products. The results show that BT adoption could increase the recycling rate and demand for remanufactured products. BT benefits the firms in the CLSC when they control usage costs, regardless of whether competitive recycling mode is used or not. In addition, whether BT is adopted or not, CLSC firms prefer competitive recycling mode only when the competitive intensity exceeds a specific threshold. Moreover, choosing an appropriate recycling mode can alleviate the negative impact of BT on the environment, then an all-win result can be obtained for CLSC firms, consumers, and society. These results can give suggestions for managers to optimize their supply chains regarding adopting BT and implementing recycling mode. In the future, we can expand our research on the transfer price of used products, the positive and negative effects of BT, and BT cost-sharing strategies.
如何通过区块链技术在垄断与竞争之间选择回收模式?
企业采用循环经济的方式可以有效解决资源和环境的严峻形势,循环利用被认为是解决环境问题的有效手段。与此同时,区块链技术(BT)也被用于提高产品质量信任度。然而,关于如何通过考虑 BT 在垄断性和竞争性回收模式之间进行选择的文献却很有限。本文采用的博弈涉及闭环供应链(CLSC)中的制造商、零售商和第三方回收商(TPR)。零售商可以自行回收废旧产品,也可以与第三方回收商竞争回收废旧产品。结果表明,采用 BT 可以提高回收率,增加对再制造产品的需求。无论是否采用竞争性回收模式,CLSC 中的企业在控制使用成本时,都能从 BT 中获益。此外,无论是否采用 BT,只有当竞争强度超过特定临界值时,供应链中的企业才会选择竞争性回收模式。此外,选择合适的回收模式可以减轻 BT 对环境的负面影响,从而实现供应链企业、消费者和社会的多赢。这些结果可以为管理者在采用 BT 和实施回收模式时优化供应链提供建议。未来,我们还可以在废旧产品转让价格、BT 的正负效应以及 BT 成本分担策略等方面展开研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信