Forging one’s identity as a twin: Balancing sibling cohesion and deidentification

Laurie Kramer, Cassandra M. Dean, Alexis A. Dean, Melissa S. Morgan
{"title":"Forging one’s identity as a twin: Balancing sibling cohesion and deidentification","authors":"Laurie Kramer, Cassandra M. Dean, Alexis A. Dean, Melissa S. Morgan","doi":"10.1177/02654075241265474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known about how twins influence one another’s development during emerging adulthood. Although the exact mechanisms that underlie sibling influence have not been firmly established, they likely encompass processes that highlight either sibling identification (e.g., seeking similarities and imitation in the service of building cohesion) or deidentification (e.g., seeking differences that distinguish themselves to reduce competition, rivalry, and jealousy). Because past research inferred these processes rather than directly assess them, we conducted a mixed methods study in which 20 sets of monozygotic (MZ, n = 11 dyads) and dizygotic (DZ, n = 9 dyads) twins, aged 19.70 years (SD = 1.11), were interviewed individually regarding their personal identity development and sibling relationship. A grounded theory approach guided the qualitative analysis, which included coordinating twins’ interview responses at the dyadic level. Each twin also completed the Adult Sibling Relationship Questionnaire which provided a complementary quantitative assessment. 75% of the dyads prioritized differentiation and felt that college was the optimal time to pursue unique identities and goals. Those who prioritized seeking similarity were MZ twins who sought emotional closeness and support and attended the same college. Rather than pitting social learning and deidentification as opposing processes, the results suggest that deidentification is a developmental process in which twins increasingly take steps towards independence while seeking to retain the closeness, trust, and reliance they have long enjoyed in their relationship. Practical implications for helping twins balance their needs for autonomy and distinctiveness, while maintaining emotional closeness, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":508458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241265474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about how twins influence one another’s development during emerging adulthood. Although the exact mechanisms that underlie sibling influence have not been firmly established, they likely encompass processes that highlight either sibling identification (e.g., seeking similarities and imitation in the service of building cohesion) or deidentification (e.g., seeking differences that distinguish themselves to reduce competition, rivalry, and jealousy). Because past research inferred these processes rather than directly assess them, we conducted a mixed methods study in which 20 sets of monozygotic (MZ, n = 11 dyads) and dizygotic (DZ, n = 9 dyads) twins, aged 19.70 years (SD = 1.11), were interviewed individually regarding their personal identity development and sibling relationship. A grounded theory approach guided the qualitative analysis, which included coordinating twins’ interview responses at the dyadic level. Each twin also completed the Adult Sibling Relationship Questionnaire which provided a complementary quantitative assessment. 75% of the dyads prioritized differentiation and felt that college was the optimal time to pursue unique identities and goals. Those who prioritized seeking similarity were MZ twins who sought emotional closeness and support and attended the same college. Rather than pitting social learning and deidentification as opposing processes, the results suggest that deidentification is a developmental process in which twins increasingly take steps towards independence while seeking to retain the closeness, trust, and reliance they have long enjoyed in their relationship. Practical implications for helping twins balance their needs for autonomy and distinctiveness, while maintaining emotional closeness, are discussed.
打造双胞胎身份:在兄弟姐妹的凝聚力和去身份化之间取得平衡
人们对双胞胎如何在成年期影响彼此的发展知之甚少。尽管兄弟姐妹之间相互影响的确切机制还没有得到确定,但它们很可能包含了突出兄弟姐妹认同(例如,为建立凝聚力而寻求相似性和模仿)或去认同(例如,为减少竞争、竞争和嫉妒而寻求与众不同的差异)的过程。由于过去的研究是对这些过程进行推断而不是直接评估,因此我们进行了一项混合方法研究,对 20 组单卵双生(MZ,n = 11 对)和双卵双生(DZ,n = 9 对)双胞胎(年龄为 19.70 岁(SD = 1.11))就其个人身份发展和兄弟姐妹关系进行了单独访谈。定性分析以基础理论方法为指导,包括在双亲层面协调双胞胎的访谈回答。每对双胞胎还填写了成人兄弟姐妹关系问卷,以提供补充性的定量评估。75%的双生子将差异化放在首位,认为大学是追求独特身份和目标的最佳时机。而那些优先追求相似性的 MZ 双胞胎则寻求情感上的亲近和支持,并就读于同一所大学。研究结果并没有把社会学习和去身份化对立起来,而是表明去身份化是一个发展过程,在这个过程中,双胞胎越来越多地走向独立,同时寻求保留他们在关系中长期享有的亲密、信任和依赖。本文讨论了帮助双胞胎在保持情感亲密的同时平衡自主性和独特性需求的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信