Turbulence Closure Modeling with Machine Learning: A Foundational Physics Perspective

S. Girimaji
{"title":"Turbulence Closure Modeling with Machine Learning: A Foundational Physics Perspective","authors":"S. Girimaji","doi":"10.1088/1367-2630/ad6689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Turbulence closure modeling using machine learning is at an early crossroads. The extraordinary success of machine learning (ML) in a variety of challenging fields had given rise to an expectation of similar transformative advances in the area of turbulence closure modeling. However, by most accounts, the current rate of progress toward accurate and predictive ML-RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) closure models has been very slow. Upon retrospection, the absence of rapid transformative progress can be attributed to two factors: the underestimation of the intricacies of turbulence modeling and the overestimation of ML’s ability to capture all features without employing targeted strategies. To pave the way for more meaningful ML closures tailored to address the nuances of turbulence, this article seeks to review the foundational flow physics to assess the challenges in the context of data-driven approaches. Revisiting analogies with statistical mechanics and stochastic systems, the key physical complexities and mathematical limitations are explicated. It is noted that the current ML approaches do not systematically address the inherent limitations of a statistical approach or the inadequacies of the mathematical forms of closure expressions. The study underscores the drawbacks of supervised learning-based closures and stresses the importance of a more discerning ML modeling framework. As ML methods evolve (which is happening at a rapid pace) and our understanding of the turbulence phenomenon improves, the inferences expressed here should be suitably modified.","PeriodicalId":508829,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of Physics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ad6689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Turbulence closure modeling using machine learning is at an early crossroads. The extraordinary success of machine learning (ML) in a variety of challenging fields had given rise to an expectation of similar transformative advances in the area of turbulence closure modeling. However, by most accounts, the current rate of progress toward accurate and predictive ML-RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) closure models has been very slow. Upon retrospection, the absence of rapid transformative progress can be attributed to two factors: the underestimation of the intricacies of turbulence modeling and the overestimation of ML’s ability to capture all features without employing targeted strategies. To pave the way for more meaningful ML closures tailored to address the nuances of turbulence, this article seeks to review the foundational flow physics to assess the challenges in the context of data-driven approaches. Revisiting analogies with statistical mechanics and stochastic systems, the key physical complexities and mathematical limitations are explicated. It is noted that the current ML approaches do not systematically address the inherent limitations of a statistical approach or the inadequacies of the mathematical forms of closure expressions. The study underscores the drawbacks of supervised learning-based closures and stresses the importance of a more discerning ML modeling framework. As ML methods evolve (which is happening at a rapid pace) and our understanding of the turbulence phenomenon improves, the inferences expressed here should be suitably modified.
用机器学习进行湍流闭合建模:基础物理学视角
利用机器学习进行湍流闭合建模正处于一个早期的十字路口。机器学习(ML)在多个具有挑战性的领域取得了非凡的成功,这让人们期待在湍流闭合建模领域也能取得类似的变革性进展。然而,大多数人都认为,目前在建立精确的、具有预测性的 ML-RANS(雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯)闭合模型方面进展非常缓慢。回过头来看,缺乏快速变革性进展可归因于两个因素:低估了湍流建模的复杂性,以及高估了 ML 在不采用针对性策略的情况下捕捉所有特征的能力。为了给针对湍流细微差别而定制的更有意义的 ML 闭合铺平道路,本文试图回顾基础流动物理学,以评估数据驱动方法背景下的挑战。通过重新审视与统计力学和随机系统的类比,阐述了关键的物理复杂性和数学局限性。研究指出,当前的 ML 方法没有系统地解决统计方法的固有局限性或闭合表达式数学形式的不足。这项研究强调了基于监督学习的闭合方法的缺点,并强调了更具洞察力的 ML 建模框架的重要性。随着 ML 方法的发展(发展速度很快)和我们对湍流现象理解的加深,本文所表达的推论也应适当修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信