Adjunctive Uterine Incision Compression Versus Tourniquet Alone for Reduction of Blood Loss During Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q4 Medicine
J. Imaralu, O. Loto, Adebisi Florence Oguntade, O. Jagun, Taofeek Ogunfunmilayo, A. Akadri, Oladapo Walker
{"title":"Adjunctive Uterine Incision Compression Versus Tourniquet Alone for Reduction of Blood Loss During Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"J. Imaralu, O. Loto, Adebisi Florence Oguntade, O. Jagun, Taofeek Ogunfunmilayo, A. Akadri, Oladapo Walker","doi":"10.4314/aas.v21i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The effectiveness of the uterine tourniquet alone for securing hemostasis during abdominal myomectomy remains  debatable; however, its combination with uterine compression though popular has very scanty documented evidence of hemostatic  efficacy. \nAim: To determine the effect of uterine incision compression (UIC) combined with tourniquet on operative blood loss associated  with abdominal myomectomy. \nMaterials and Methods: A multicenter randomized double blind, controlled trial involving 184  participants randomized into two groups: 92 in the UIC and 92 in the control arm. UIC was administered in the interval from release of  the uterine tourniquet to palpation of contraction. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version  21. \nResults: The mean intraoperative blood loss was lower in the UIC group (951.41 ± 362.32 mL) than in the control group  (1051.30 ± 427.77 mL), but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.125). The observed mean duration of myomectomy was, however,  longer among the controls (152.95 ± 32.67 min, compared with 119.70 ± 23.96 min, p = 0.001). The control group also had significantly higher rates of deployment of additional hemostatic measures (OR = 4.68, 95% CI = 2.304–12.784, p = 0.001), occurrence of postoperative  pyrexia (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.256–2.154, p = 0.002), and greater mean postoperative blood loss (p = 0.003). \nConclusion: Although no  statistically significant difference occurred in intraoperative blood loss, adjunctive UIC was useful in reducing operating time and  postoperative blood loss ","PeriodicalId":37442,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/aas.v21i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The effectiveness of the uterine tourniquet alone for securing hemostasis during abdominal myomectomy remains  debatable; however, its combination with uterine compression though popular has very scanty documented evidence of hemostatic  efficacy. Aim: To determine the effect of uterine incision compression (UIC) combined with tourniquet on operative blood loss associated  with abdominal myomectomy. Materials and Methods: A multicenter randomized double blind, controlled trial involving 184  participants randomized into two groups: 92 in the UIC and 92 in the control arm. UIC was administered in the interval from release of  the uterine tourniquet to palpation of contraction. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version  21. Results: The mean intraoperative blood loss was lower in the UIC group (951.41 ± 362.32 mL) than in the control group  (1051.30 ± 427.77 mL), but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.125). The observed mean duration of myomectomy was, however,  longer among the controls (152.95 ± 32.67 min, compared with 119.70 ± 23.96 min, p = 0.001). The control group also had significantly higher rates of deployment of additional hemostatic measures (OR = 4.68, 95% CI = 2.304–12.784, p = 0.001), occurrence of postoperative  pyrexia (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.256–2.154, p = 0.002), and greater mean postoperative blood loss (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Although no  statistically significant difference occurred in intraoperative blood loss, adjunctive UIC was useful in reducing operating time and  postoperative blood loss 
辅助子宫切口压迫与单用止血带减少腹部肌瘤切除术中的失血量:随机对照试验
导言:在腹部子宫肌瘤切除术中,单独使用子宫止血带止血的效果仍有待商榷;然而,将子宫止血带与子宫压迫术结合使用虽然很流行,但止血效果的文献证据却非常稀少。目的:确定子宫切口压迫(UIC)联合止血带对腹部子宫肌瘤切除术相关手术失血的影响。材料与方法:多中心随机双盲对照试验,将 184 名参与者随机分为两组:92 人参加子宫切口压力术,92 人参加对照组。从松开子宫止血带到触诊宫缩的间歇期进行 UIC。数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第 21 版进行分析。结果UIC 组的术中平均失血量(951.41 ± 362.32 mL)低于对照组(1051.30 ± 427.77 mL),但未达到统计学意义(P = 0.125)。不过,观察到的子宫肌瘤切除术平均持续时间在对照组中更长(152.95 ± 32.67 分钟,而对照组为 119.70 ± 23.96 分钟,p = 0.001)。对照组采用额外止血措施(OR = 4.68,95% CI = 2.304-12.784,p = 0.001)、术后发热(OR = 1.65,95% CI = 1.256-2.154,p = 0.002)和术后平均失血量(p = 0.003)的比例也明显更高。结论虽然在术中失血量方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异,但辅助 UIC 有助于缩短手术时间和减少术后失血量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Surgery
Annals of African Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Surgery ANN. AFR. SURG. (ISSN: 1999-9674 [print], ISSN: 2523-0816 [online]) is a bi-annual publication that aims to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between surgeons in the African region. The journal embraces surgery in all its aspects: basic science, clinical research, experimental research, and surgical education. The Annals of African Surgery will help surgeons in the region keep abreast of developing surgical innovations. This Ethics Policies document is intended to inform the public and all persons affiliated with The Annals of African Surgery of its general ethics policies. Types of articles published: -Original articles -Case reports -Case series -Reviews -Short communications -Letters to the editor -Commentaries Annals of African Surgery publishes manuscripts in the following fields: - Cardiac and thoracic surgery - General surgery - Neurosurgery - Oral and maxillofacial surgery - Trauma and orthopaedic surgery - Otolaryngology (ear, nose and throat surgery) - Paediatric surgery - Plastic and reconstructive surgery - Urology surgery - Gynaecologic surgery - Surgical education -Medical education -Global surgery - Health advocacy - Innovations in surgery - Basic sciences - Anatomical sciences - Genetic and molecular studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信