Utilizing Multi-Class Classification Methods for Automated Sleep Disorder Prediction

Information Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.3390/info15080426
Elias Dritsas, M. Trigka
{"title":"Utilizing Multi-Class Classification Methods for Automated Sleep Disorder Prediction","authors":"Elias Dritsas, M. Trigka","doi":"10.3390/info15080426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even from infancy, a human’s day-life alternates from a period of wakefulness to a period of sleep at night, during the 24-hour cycle. Sleep is a normal process necessary for human physical and mental health. A lack of sleep makes it difficult to control emotions and behaviour, reduces productivity at work, and can even increase stress or depression. In addition, poor sleep affects health; when sleep is insufficient, the chances of developing serious diseases greatly increase. Researchers in sleep medicine have identified an extensive list of sleep disorders, and thus leveraged Artificial Intelligence (AI) to automate their analysis and gain a deeper understanding of sleep patterns and related disorders. In this research, we seek a Machine Learning (ML) solution that will allow for efficient classification of unlabeled instances as being Sleep Apnea, Insomnia or Normal (subjects without a specific sleep disorder) by assessing the performance of two well-established strategies for multi-class classification tasks: the One-Vs-All (OVA) and One-Vs-One (OVO). In the context of the specific strategies, two well-known binary classification models were assumed, Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Both strategies’ validity was verified upon a dataset of diverse information related to the profiles (anthropometric data, sleep metrics, lifestyle and cardiovascular health factors) of potential patients or individuals not exhibiting any specific sleep disorder. Performance evaluation was carried out by comparing the weighted average results in all involved classes that represent these two specific sleep disorders and no-disorder occurrence; accuracy, kappa score, precision, recall, f-measure, and Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) were recorded and compared to identify an effective and robust model and strategy, both class-wise and on average. The experimental evaluation unveiled that after feature selection, 2-degree polynomial SVM under both strategies was the least complex and most efficient, recording an accuracy of 91.44%, a kappa score of 84.97%, precision, recall and f-measure equal to 0.914, and an AUC of 0.927.","PeriodicalId":510156,"journal":{"name":"Information","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even from infancy, a human’s day-life alternates from a period of wakefulness to a period of sleep at night, during the 24-hour cycle. Sleep is a normal process necessary for human physical and mental health. A lack of sleep makes it difficult to control emotions and behaviour, reduces productivity at work, and can even increase stress or depression. In addition, poor sleep affects health; when sleep is insufficient, the chances of developing serious diseases greatly increase. Researchers in sleep medicine have identified an extensive list of sleep disorders, and thus leveraged Artificial Intelligence (AI) to automate their analysis and gain a deeper understanding of sleep patterns and related disorders. In this research, we seek a Machine Learning (ML) solution that will allow for efficient classification of unlabeled instances as being Sleep Apnea, Insomnia or Normal (subjects without a specific sleep disorder) by assessing the performance of two well-established strategies for multi-class classification tasks: the One-Vs-All (OVA) and One-Vs-One (OVO). In the context of the specific strategies, two well-known binary classification models were assumed, Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Both strategies’ validity was verified upon a dataset of diverse information related to the profiles (anthropometric data, sleep metrics, lifestyle and cardiovascular health factors) of potential patients or individuals not exhibiting any specific sleep disorder. Performance evaluation was carried out by comparing the weighted average results in all involved classes that represent these two specific sleep disorders and no-disorder occurrence; accuracy, kappa score, precision, recall, f-measure, and Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) were recorded and compared to identify an effective and robust model and strategy, both class-wise and on average. The experimental evaluation unveiled that after feature selection, 2-degree polynomial SVM under both strategies was the least complex and most efficient, recording an accuracy of 91.44%, a kappa score of 84.97%, precision, recall and f-measure equal to 0.914, and an AUC of 0.927.
利用多类别分类方法自动预测睡眠障碍
即使从婴儿期开始,人的白天生活也是在 24 小时的周期中,从清醒到夜间睡眠的交替进行。睡眠是人类身心健康所必需的正常过程。睡眠不足会使人难以控制情绪和行为,降低工作效率,甚至会增加压力或抑郁。此外,睡眠不足还会影响健康;睡眠不足时,罹患严重疾病的几率会大大增加。睡眠医学研究人员已经发现了大量睡眠障碍,因此利用人工智能(AI)来自动分析,深入了解睡眠模式和相关障碍。在这项研究中,我们寻求一种机器学习(ML)解决方案,通过评估两种行之有效的多类分类任务策略(One-Vs-All (OVA) 和 One-Vs-One (OVO))的性能,高效地将未标记的实例分类为睡眠呼吸暂停、失眠或正常(无特定睡眠障碍的受试者)。在特定策略的背景下,假设了两种著名的二元分类模型,即逻辑回归(LR)和支持向量机(SVM)。这两种策略的有效性都是通过一个数据集来验证的,该数据集包含潜在患者或未表现出任何特定睡眠障碍的个人的各种相关信息(人体测量数据、睡眠指标、生活方式和心血管健康因素)。性能评估是通过比较代表这两种特定睡眠障碍和无障碍发生的所有相关类别的加权平均结果来进行的;准确率、卡帕得分、精确度、召回率、f-measure 和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)都被记录下来并进行了比较,以确定一个有效且稳健的模型和策略(包括类别和平均值)。实验评估结果表明,在特征选择之后,两种策略下的 2 度多项式 SVM 的复杂度最低,效率最高,其准确率为 91.44%,卡帕得分为 84.97%,精确度、召回率和 f 均值均为 0.914,AUC 为 0.927。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信