#CannesYouNot? Oppositional and asymmetrical versions of believability in the Depp/Heard case

Karen Boyle, Emma Flynn, Melody House, Chamil Rathnayake
{"title":"#CannesYouNot? Oppositional and asymmetrical versions of believability in the Depp/Heard case","authors":"Karen Boyle, Emma Flynn, Melody House, Chamil Rathnayake","doi":"10.1177/13675494241262438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Johnny Depp’s contentious return to the red carpet at the 2023 Cannes Film Festival sparked fervent debate online about domestic abuse, believability, #MeToo and the rehabilitation of men accused of abuse. In this article, we analyse two oppositional hashtags that became central to this discussion on Twitter: #CannesYouNot, created by supporters of Depp’s ex-wife Amber Heard; and #YesYouCannes, the response offered by Depp’s supporters. Drawing on a dataset of 18,000 tweets, we combine a network analysis with a qualitative analysis of the top tweets using each hashtag in order to understand how the hashtags circulated, their affective orientations and the evidence they use to support their positions. Our findings show that networked media allow the (re)construction of existing hierarchies of power; thus, we argue that although these appear to be straightforwardly oppositional hashtags, they operate asymmetrically in ways that have implications for our understandings of issue publics as well as ramifications for feminist digital activism.","PeriodicalId":502446,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"64 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241262438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Johnny Depp’s contentious return to the red carpet at the 2023 Cannes Film Festival sparked fervent debate online about domestic abuse, believability, #MeToo and the rehabilitation of men accused of abuse. In this article, we analyse two oppositional hashtags that became central to this discussion on Twitter: #CannesYouNot, created by supporters of Depp’s ex-wife Amber Heard; and #YesYouCannes, the response offered by Depp’s supporters. Drawing on a dataset of 18,000 tweets, we combine a network analysis with a qualitative analysis of the top tweets using each hashtag in order to understand how the hashtags circulated, their affective orientations and the evidence they use to support their positions. Our findings show that networked media allow the (re)construction of existing hierarchies of power; thus, we argue that although these appear to be straightforwardly oppositional hashtags, they operate asymmetrically in ways that have implications for our understandings of issue publics as well as ramifications for feminist digital activism.
#CannesYouNot?德普/赫德案中对立和不对称的可信度版本
约翰尼-德普(Johnny Depp)在 2023 年戛纳电影节红毯上的回归引发了关于家庭虐待、可信度、#MeToo 和被指控虐待的男性的康复问题的激烈网络讨论。在本文中,我们将分析在推特上成为这场讨论核心的两个对立标签:#CannesYouNot,由德普前妻安珀-赫德(Amber Heard)的支持者创建;#YesYouCannes,则是德普支持者的回应。我们利用一个包含 18,000 条推文的数据集,将网络分析与对使用每个标签的热门推文的定性分析相结合,以了解这些标签是如何传播的、它们的情感取向以及它们用来支持其立场的证据。我们的研究结果表明,网络媒体允许(重新)构建现有的权力等级制度;因此,我们认为,尽管这些标签看似直截了当的对立标签,但它们以不对称的方式运作,这对我们理解议题公众产生了影响,也对女权主义数字行动主义产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信