Optimising species detection probability and sampling effort in lake fish eDNA surveys

Graham S. Sellers, C. Jerde, Lynsey R. Harper, Marco Benucci, Cristina Di Muri, Jianlong Li, Graeme Peirson, Kerry Walsh, Tristan Hatton-Ellis, Willie Duncan, Alistair Duguid, Dave Ottewell, Nigel Willby, Alan Law, Colin W. Bean, I. Winfield, Daniel S. Read, Lori-Jayne Lawson Handley, B. Hänfling
{"title":"Optimising species detection probability and sampling effort in lake fish eDNA surveys","authors":"Graham S. Sellers, C. Jerde, Lynsey R. Harper, Marco Benucci, Cristina Di Muri, Jianlong Li, Graeme Peirson, Kerry Walsh, Tristan Hatton-Ellis, Willie Duncan, Alistair Duguid, Dave Ottewell, Nigel Willby, Alan Law, Colin W. Bean, I. Winfield, Daniel S. Read, Lori-Jayne Lawson Handley, B. Hänfling","doi":"10.3897/mbmg.8.104655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is transforming biodiversity monitoring in aquatic environments. Such an approach has been developed and deployed for monitoring lake fish communities in Great Britain, where the method has repeatedly shown a comparable or better performance than conventional approaches. Previous analyses indicated that 20 water samples per lake are sufficient to reliably estimate fish species richness, but it is unclear how reduced eDNA sampling effort affects richness, or other biodiversity estimates and metrics. As the number of samples strongly influences the cost of monitoring programmes, it is essential that sampling effort is optimised for a specific monitoring objective. The aim of this project was to explore the effect of reduced eDNA sampling effort on biodiversity metrics (namely species richness and community composition) using algorithmic and statistical resampling techniques of a data set from 101 lakes, covering a wide spectrum of lake types and ecological quality. The results showed that reliable estimation of lake fish species richness could, in fact, usually be achieved with a much lower number of samples. For example, in almost 90% of lakes, 95% of complete fish richness could be detected with only 10 water samples, regardless of lake area. Similarly, other measures of alpha and beta-diversity were not greatly affected by a reduction in sample size from 20 to 10 samples. We also found that there is no significant difference in detected species richness between shoreline and offshore sampling transects, allowing for simplified field logistics. This could potentially allow the effective sampling of a larger number of lakes within a given monitoring budget. However, rare species were more often missed with fewer samples, with potential implications for monitoring of invasive or endangered species. These results should inform the design of eDNA sampling strategies, so that these can be optimised to achieve specific monitoring goals.","PeriodicalId":506127,"journal":{"name":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.8.104655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is transforming biodiversity monitoring in aquatic environments. Such an approach has been developed and deployed for monitoring lake fish communities in Great Britain, where the method has repeatedly shown a comparable or better performance than conventional approaches. Previous analyses indicated that 20 water samples per lake are sufficient to reliably estimate fish species richness, but it is unclear how reduced eDNA sampling effort affects richness, or other biodiversity estimates and metrics. As the number of samples strongly influences the cost of monitoring programmes, it is essential that sampling effort is optimised for a specific monitoring objective. The aim of this project was to explore the effect of reduced eDNA sampling effort on biodiversity metrics (namely species richness and community composition) using algorithmic and statistical resampling techniques of a data set from 101 lakes, covering a wide spectrum of lake types and ecological quality. The results showed that reliable estimation of lake fish species richness could, in fact, usually be achieved with a much lower number of samples. For example, in almost 90% of lakes, 95% of complete fish richness could be detected with only 10 water samples, regardless of lake area. Similarly, other measures of alpha and beta-diversity were not greatly affected by a reduction in sample size from 20 to 10 samples. We also found that there is no significant difference in detected species richness between shoreline and offshore sampling transects, allowing for simplified field logistics. This could potentially allow the effective sampling of a larger number of lakes within a given monitoring budget. However, rare species were more often missed with fewer samples, with potential implications for monitoring of invasive or endangered species. These results should inform the design of eDNA sampling strategies, so that these can be optimised to achieve specific monitoring goals.
优化湖泊鱼类 eDNA 调查中的物种检测概率和取样工作
环境 DNA(eDNA)代谢编码正在改变水生环境中的生物多样性监测。这种方法已被开发并应用于英国的湖泊鱼类群落监测,该方法多次显示出与传统方法相当或更好的性能。以前的分析表明,每个湖泊采集 20 个水样就足以可靠地估计鱼类物种丰富度,但目前还不清楚减少 eDNA 采样量对丰富度或其他生物多样性估计和指标有何影响。由于样本数量会严重影响监测计划的成本,因此必须针对特定的监测目标优化取样工作。该项目的目的是利用算法和统计重采样技术,探索减少 eDNA 采样量对生物多样性指标(即物种丰富度和群落组成)的影响,数据集来自 101 个湖泊,涵盖了广泛的湖泊类型和生态质量。结果表明,通常只需更少的样本数量,就能可靠地估计湖泊鱼类物种丰富度。例如,在近 90% 的湖泊中,无论湖泊面积大小,只需 10 个水样就能检测到 95% 的完整鱼类丰富度。同样,将样本数量从 20 个减少到 10 个,也不会对其他α和β多样性指标产生很大影响。我们还发现,沿岸和离岸取样横断面在检测到的物种丰富度方面没有明显差异,从而简化了现场后勤工作。这样就有可能在给定的监测预算内对更多湖泊进行有效采样。不过,样本越少,稀有物种越容易被遗漏,这对监测入侵物种或濒危物种有潜在影响。这些结果应为 eDNA 采样策略的设计提供参考,以便优化这些策略,实现特定的监测目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信