Assessing Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness Briefly

Frank Martela, Richard M. Ryan
{"title":"Assessing Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness Briefly","authors":"Frank Martela, Richard M. Ryan","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The satisfaction of the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness have been established as central components of human well-being, predictive of various positive behavioral and psychological outcomes. However, in many contexts, they need to be assessed very briefly, sometimes with just one item. Recent research has shown that well-designed single-item scales of relatively unidimensional constructs can perform surprisingly well. Accordingly, this project aimed to create and validate single-item scales for the three needs. In Study 1 ( n = 353, UK), we generated new items based on careful examination of the construct definitions and tested them alongside established multi-item need satisfaction scales. In Study 2 ( n = 335, US), we replicated these results using a shorter time span (need satisfaction yesterday). Study 3 ( n = 327, UK) compared the performance to a few other brief need satisfaction scales. In all studies, the new single items loaded excellently on respective longer scales and correlated with criterion variables at near identical levels as the longer scales. Given that the performance of the single-item scales was comparable to the established multi-item scales, they are recommended as valid and useful measures of need satisfaction for research context requiring very brief measures.","PeriodicalId":508777,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"57 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The satisfaction of the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness have been established as central components of human well-being, predictive of various positive behavioral and psychological outcomes. However, in many contexts, they need to be assessed very briefly, sometimes with just one item. Recent research has shown that well-designed single-item scales of relatively unidimensional constructs can perform surprisingly well. Accordingly, this project aimed to create and validate single-item scales for the three needs. In Study 1 ( n = 353, UK), we generated new items based on careful examination of the construct definitions and tested them alongside established multi-item need satisfaction scales. In Study 2 ( n = 335, US), we replicated these results using a shorter time span (need satisfaction yesterday). Study 3 ( n = 327, UK) compared the performance to a few other brief need satisfaction scales. In all studies, the new single items loaded excellently on respective longer scales and correlated with criterion variables at near identical levels as the longer scales. Given that the performance of the single-item scales was comparable to the established multi-item scales, they are recommended as valid and useful measures of need satisfaction for research context requiring very brief measures.
自主性、能力和相关性评估简介
摘要:自主性、能力和相关性心理需求的满足已被确定为人类福祉的核心组成部分,可预测各种积极的行为和心理结果。然而,在许多情况下,需要对它们进行非常简短的评估,有时只需要一个项目。最近的研究表明,设计良好的单项量表可以对相对单一维度的结构进行评估,而且效果出奇的好。因此,本项目旨在为这三种需求创建并验证单项量表。在研究 1(n = 353,英国)中,我们在仔细研究结构定义的基础上生成了新的项目,并将它们与已建立的多项目需求满意度量表一起进行了测试。在研究 2(n = 335,美国)中,我们使用较短的时间跨度(昨天的需求满意度)复制了这些结果。研究 3(n = 327,英国)将其表现与其他一些简短的需求满意度量表进行了比较。在所有研究中,新的单项量表在各自的长量表上都有很好的加载,并且与标准变量的相关性几乎与长量表相同。鉴于单项目量表的表现与已建立的多项目量表不相上下,建议在需要非常简短的测量方法的研究环境中,将其作为有效和有用的需求满意度测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信