An Inclusional-Dialogic Approach to Qualitative Inquiry

Eva Vass
{"title":"An Inclusional-Dialogic Approach to Qualitative Inquiry","authors":"Eva Vass","doi":"10.1177/19408447241267279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My research looks into collaborative learning and co-creativity in educational contexts. This paper presents my research trajectory towards inclusional-dialogic perception, discernment, and expression. I understand this phenomenon as thinking from presence: a natural inquiry process that is immersive, dialogic, and inherently embodied; a creative dialogue between self and habitat. I combine Natural Inclusionality and dialogism as my philosophical foundations. Importantly, I extend the notion of thinking from presence to the research inquiry itself, broadening the scope of scientific explorations of experience. Thus, the inquiry becomes a dance in between extraspection (outward perception) and introspection (inward sensing), brought together in an empathic second perspective. The natural inclusional approach entails a move away from the logic and language of definition into the logic and language of flow. This article discusses how fluid logic has shaped my research approach and my writing, with three emergent features. First, the inquiry and its documentation constitute an open-ended and serendipitous dialogue with the phenomena in focus. Second, research analysis and writing moves away from the predominance of the textual, recognizing that the translation of the experience into language is not an unavoidable necessity. It also underlines the significance of the visual and poetic expression of philosophy, methods, and findings, fusing science and art into partnership. Third, the disseminative writing is immersive. It openly brings forth an interplay between subjective and objective. My own lived, personal experience of the researched phenomena is a central layer of experiential meaning making, affording contemplative insight. Centering my research approach around the notion of thinking from presence is not a purely epistemological issue. It speaks to the nature of reality and captures the overarching desire to contribute to a deeper human understanding of the self in the context of its natural neighborhood.","PeriodicalId":512691,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Qualitative Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447241267279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

My research looks into collaborative learning and co-creativity in educational contexts. This paper presents my research trajectory towards inclusional-dialogic perception, discernment, and expression. I understand this phenomenon as thinking from presence: a natural inquiry process that is immersive, dialogic, and inherently embodied; a creative dialogue between self and habitat. I combine Natural Inclusionality and dialogism as my philosophical foundations. Importantly, I extend the notion of thinking from presence to the research inquiry itself, broadening the scope of scientific explorations of experience. Thus, the inquiry becomes a dance in between extraspection (outward perception) and introspection (inward sensing), brought together in an empathic second perspective. The natural inclusional approach entails a move away from the logic and language of definition into the logic and language of flow. This article discusses how fluid logic has shaped my research approach and my writing, with three emergent features. First, the inquiry and its documentation constitute an open-ended and serendipitous dialogue with the phenomena in focus. Second, research analysis and writing moves away from the predominance of the textual, recognizing that the translation of the experience into language is not an unavoidable necessity. It also underlines the significance of the visual and poetic expression of philosophy, methods, and findings, fusing science and art into partnership. Third, the disseminative writing is immersive. It openly brings forth an interplay between subjective and objective. My own lived, personal experience of the researched phenomena is a central layer of experiential meaning making, affording contemplative insight. Centering my research approach around the notion of thinking from presence is not a purely epistemological issue. It speaks to the nature of reality and captures the overarching desire to contribute to a deeper human understanding of the self in the context of its natural neighborhood.
定性调查的包容--对话方法
我的研究着眼于教育背景下的协作学习和共同创造。本文介绍了我在包容性对话式感知、辨别和表达方面的研究轨迹。我将这一现象理解为 "临场思维":一种身临其境、对话式和内在体现的自然探究过程;一种自我与栖息地之间的创造性对话。我将自然包容性和对话主义作为我的哲学基础。重要的是,我将 "从存在中思考 "的概念延伸到研究探索本身,扩大了科学探索经验的范围。因此,探究就成了外部观察(向外感知)和内部观察(向内感知)之间的舞蹈,在移情的第二视角中结合在一起。自然包容性方法要求从定义逻辑和语言转向流动逻辑和语言。本文讨论了流动逻辑如何塑造了我的研究方法和写作,其中有三个新的特点。首先,调查及其记录构成了与所关注现象的开放式偶然对话。其次,研究分析和写作摆脱了文本的主导地位,认识到将经验转化为语言并非不可避免。它还强调以视觉和诗歌的方式表达哲学、方法和研究成果的意义,将科学与艺术融合为伙伴关系。第三,传播性写作是身临其境的。它公开提出了主观与客观之间的相互作用。我对所研究现象的亲身经历是体验式意义建构的核心层,提供了沉思的洞察力。我的研究方法围绕着 "从存在中思考 "这一概念,这并不是一个纯粹的认识论问题。它道出了现实的本质,抓住了人类在自然邻域背景下更深入地理解自我的总体愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信