Alexandra E. Rojek, Benjamin J. McCormick, Joanna Cwykiel, Oluwatobi Odetola, Yasmin Abaza, Nhi Nai, Charles E. Foucar, Rohan K. Achar, Rory M. Shallis, Danielle Bradshaw, Meaghan Standridge, Vamsi Kota, Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy, Talha Badar, Anand A. Patel
{"title":"Real-world outcomes of intensive induction approaches in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia","authors":"Alexandra E. Rojek, Benjamin J. McCormick, Joanna Cwykiel, Oluwatobi Odetola, Yasmin Abaza, Nhi Nai, Charles E. Foucar, Rohan K. Achar, Rory M. Shallis, Danielle Bradshaw, Meaghan Standridge, Vamsi Kota, Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy, Talha Badar, Anand A. Patel","doi":"10.1002/jha2.981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF-AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF-AML. We included 200 patients with CBF-AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3-year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3-year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (<i>p</i> = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3-year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (<i>p</i> = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF-AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"5 4","pages":"728-737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.981","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF-AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF-AML. We included 200 patients with CBF-AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3-year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3-year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (p = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3-year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (p = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF-AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.
核心结合因子急性髓性白血病(CBF-AML)的特征是存在inv(16)/t(16;16)或t(8;21),根据2022年欧洲白血病网络(ELN)指南,CBF-AML被归类为高危白血病。CD33靶向抗体-药物共轭物吉妥珠单抗-奥佐加米星(GO)通常被添加到CBF-AML的强化化疗(IC)中。我们试图比较 CBF-AML 患者在接受 IC 治疗的同时接受或不接受 GO 治疗的疗效。我们纳入了七个学术中心的 200 名接受 IC 治疗的 CBF-AML 患者。诱导治疗方案分为单用 IC、IC 联合 GO 或 IC 联合 KIT 抑制剂(达沙替尼或米多司他林)。整个队列的中位随访时间为2.5年。三年总生存率(OS)为70%,三年无事件生存率(EFS)为51%。接受IC联合GO治疗的患者的3年无事件生存率为50%,而接受IC单独治疗的患者的3年无事件生存率为47%,两者无显著统计学差异(P = 0.62)。同样,与单独接受 IC 治疗的患者相比,接受 IC 联合 GO 治疗的患者的 OS 也没有改善(p = 0.67)。与使用或不使用 GO 的 IC 患者相比,使用 KIT 抑制剂治疗 IC 的患者 3 年 EFS 显著改善,达到 85%(p = 0.04)。我们在研究中发现,接受 IC 治疗的患者在加用 GO 后并没有生存获益;接受 IC 加 KIT 抑制剂治疗的 CBF-AML 患者的 EFS 有所改善,这与采用这种方法的前瞻性研究结果一致。