Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle

Mahsa Bagheri, Linda Roth, Leila Siebke, Clemens Rohde, Hans-Joachim Linke
{"title":"Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle","authors":"Mahsa Bagheri, Linda Roth, Leila Siebke, Clemens Rohde, Hans-Joachim Linke","doi":"10.5334/bc.435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The German buildings sector is currently facing a double challenge: meeting emission reduction targets and providing affordable housing in rapidly growing cities. Living space per person has a major impact on household energy consumption and it has increased significantly in recent decades. New construction increases the demand for often energy-intensive building materials, and energy demand during the use phase of buildings is positively related to the size of the space. Optimising the allocation of living space therefore offers great potential for addressing both challenges. Sufficiency policies such as flat exchanges, a financial bonus for moving and the provision of moving advice aim to reduce the total floor area in the housing sector by using existing space more efficiently. However, the effectiveness of such measures is not yet fully understood. As the sufficiency approach relies heavily on individual choices, residents’ involvement, perception and acceptance are crucial for the success of such measures. An investigation in selected German housing companies shows that the potential of these measures is not fully exploited under the current political and social framework in Germany. Social acceptance, new norms and business models for landlords are needed for the effective use of these measures.\nPolicy relevance\nHow effective is the implementation of sufficiency measures for space utilisation in the German rental housing sector? The success factors and limiting barriers of the measures along with the acceptability and effectiveness of these measures are investigated by interviewing housing companies (some of them social housing providers) that have the potential to implement such policies in their housing stock. Improvements are needed in the social and technical infrastructure to increase the effectiveness of the measures. Raising awareness, rethinking communications and designing effective financial incentives are recommended to make the measures attractive to the public. Involving all stakeholders, keeping the issue on the political agenda and engaging in dialogue with policymakers are considered effective steps in the process of achieving space sufficiency in the housing sector.","PeriodicalId":363849,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Cities","volume":"25 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The German buildings sector is currently facing a double challenge: meeting emission reduction targets and providing affordable housing in rapidly growing cities. Living space per person has a major impact on household energy consumption and it has increased significantly in recent decades. New construction increases the demand for often energy-intensive building materials, and energy demand during the use phase of buildings is positively related to the size of the space. Optimising the allocation of living space therefore offers great potential for addressing both challenges. Sufficiency policies such as flat exchanges, a financial bonus for moving and the provision of moving advice aim to reduce the total floor area in the housing sector by using existing space more efficiently. However, the effectiveness of such measures is not yet fully understood. As the sufficiency approach relies heavily on individual choices, residents’ involvement, perception and acceptance are crucial for the success of such measures. An investigation in selected German housing companies shows that the potential of these measures is not fully exploited under the current political and social framework in Germany. Social acceptance, new norms and business models for landlords are needed for the effective use of these measures. Policy relevance How effective is the implementation of sufficiency measures for space utilisation in the German rental housing sector? The success factors and limiting barriers of the measures along with the acceptability and effectiveness of these measures are investigated by interviewing housing companies (some of them social housing providers) that have the potential to implement such policies in their housing stock. Improvements are needed in the social and technical infrastructure to increase the effectiveness of the measures. Raising awareness, rethinking communications and designing effective financial incentives are recommended to make the measures attractive to the public. Involving all stakeholders, keeping the issue on the political agenda and engaging in dialogue with policymakers are considered effective steps in the process of achieving space sufficiency in the housing sector.
实施住房政策,实现充足的生活方式
德国建筑行业目前正面临着双重挑战:既要实现减排目标,又要为快速发展的城市提供经济适用房。人均居住面积对家庭能源消耗有重大影响,近几十年来,人均居住面积大幅增加。新建筑增加了对能源密集型建筑材料的需求,而建筑物使用阶段的能源需求与空间大小呈正相关。因此,优化居住空间的分配为应对这两个挑战提供了巨大的潜力。换房、搬家经济奖励和提供搬家建议等充足性政策旨在通过更有效地利用现有空间来减少住房部门的总建筑面积。然而,这些措施的效果尚不完全清楚。由于自给自足的方法在很大程度上依赖于个人选择,因此居民的参与、认知和接受程度对于此类措施的成功至关重要。对部分德国住房公司的调查显示,在德国当前的政治和社会框架下,这些措施的潜力并未得到充分挖掘。为了有效利用这些措施,需要社会的认可、新的规范以及房东的商业模式。通过采访有可能在其住房中实施此类政策的住房公司(其中一些是社会住房提供商),调查了这些措施的成功因素和限制性障碍,以及这些措施的可接受性和有效性。需要改进社会和技术基础设施,以提高这些措施的有效性。建议提高意识、重新思考沟通和设计有效的财政激励措施,使这些措施对公众具有吸引力。让所有利益攸关方参与进来,将这一问题保留在政治议程上,并与政策制定者开展对话,被认为是实现住房部门空间充足的有效步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信