Long-term results of treatment of patients with hemodynamically signifi cant internal carotid artery stenosis and contralateral occlusion

A. V. Gavrilenko, M. A. Piradov, M. Tanashyan, N. N. Al-Yousef, L. R. Bulatova, D. Y. Ziyarova, E. A. Tarabrin
{"title":"Long-term results of treatment of patients with hemodynamically signifi cant internal carotid artery stenosis and contralateral occlusion","authors":"A. V. Gavrilenko, M. A. Piradov, M. Tanashyan, N. N. Al-Yousef, L. R. Bulatova, D. Y. Ziyarova, E. A. Tarabrin","doi":"10.30629/0023-2149-2024-102-4-344-350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contralateral occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) has often been considered a predictor of adverse outcomes in surgical interventions in the carotid basin. Analysis of the results of major international studies (NASCET and ACAS) confi rms this association. However, the number of patients with contralateral occlusion in the aforementioned studies was relatively small. Recently, specialists in endovascular surgery have been evaluating radiological surgical techniques (stenting, angioplasty) of the internal carotid artery as the safest methods of surgical treatment for patients with contralateral ICA occlusion. The aim of this study is to compare and analyze the results of carotid endarterectomy and ICA stenting in patients with contralateral occlusion, as well as to evaluate the impact of concomitant factors and medical history on the outcomes of surgical intervention.","PeriodicalId":10439,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal)","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2024-102-4-344-350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contralateral occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) has often been considered a predictor of adverse outcomes in surgical interventions in the carotid basin. Analysis of the results of major international studies (NASCET and ACAS) confi rms this association. However, the number of patients with contralateral occlusion in the aforementioned studies was relatively small. Recently, specialists in endovascular surgery have been evaluating radiological surgical techniques (stenting, angioplasty) of the internal carotid artery as the safest methods of surgical treatment for patients with contralateral ICA occlusion. The aim of this study is to compare and analyze the results of carotid endarterectomy and ICA stenting in patients with contralateral occlusion, as well as to evaluate the impact of concomitant factors and medical history on the outcomes of surgical intervention.
治疗颈内动脉明显狭窄和对侧闭塞患者的长期效果
颈内动脉(ICA)的对侧闭塞通常被认为是颈动脉盆腔手术干预不良后果的预测因素。对主要国际研究(NASCET 和 ACAS)结果的分析证实了这一点。然而,在上述研究中,对侧闭塞的患者人数相对较少。最近,血管内外科专家一直在评估颈内动脉放射外科技术(支架植入术、血管成形术),将其作为对侧颈内动脉闭塞患者最安全的外科治疗方法。本研究旨在比较和分析对侧颈内动脉闭塞患者接受颈动脉内膜剥脱术和颈内动脉支架植入术的结果,并评估伴随因素和病史对手术干预结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信