Application of the Precautionary Approach to the Management of Marine Mammals in northern Canada

Mike O. Hammill, G. Stenson, T. Doniol-Valcroze, Shelley L. C. Lang
{"title":"Application of the Precautionary Approach to the Management of Marine Mammals in northern Canada","authors":"Mike O. Hammill, G. Stenson, T. Doniol-Valcroze, Shelley L. C. Lang","doi":"10.7557/3.7413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canada is committed to managing its resources using a Precautionary Approach (PA). However, when applying this approach to Arctic marine mammals, the Government of Canada must also respect the land claims agreements it has signed with Canada’s Inuit. Under these agreements the co-management boards are responsible for wildlife management within the land claim area. In addition to protecting the rights of hunters to harvest, the land claims agreements also call for the development of management systems that respect the principles of conservation and ensure sustainability of the resource, potentially resulting in a management paradox. We present criteria by which the status of a population can be assessed, and an appropriate PA framework applied. If sufficient data are available to understand the population dynamics of a given stock (i.e., a Data Rich situation), management decisions can be based upon an appropriate population model with quantitatively estimated reference levels. In cases where the population dynamics are poorly understood (i.e., Data Poor), a more conservative approach, referred to as the Potential Biological Removal (PBR) should be used to provide advice on sustainable harvest levels. Generally, only the most recent estimate of abundance is used in the PBR calculation which may ignore other data. We propose that if sufficient data are available to fit a population model, while still not sufficient to be considered Data Rich, the modelled estimate of current abundance can be used for a more robust PBR estimate. We also review guidelines for the choice of the recovery factor which is part of the PBR calculation. The apparent management paradox can be addressed within the context of a Management Procedure or Management Strategy Evaluation where Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science can contribute to setting management objectives, decision rules and appropriate time-frames that can be evaluated within a simulation environment. ","PeriodicalId":30560,"journal":{"name":"NAMMCO Scientific Publications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAMMCO Scientific Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7557/3.7413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canada is committed to managing its resources using a Precautionary Approach (PA). However, when applying this approach to Arctic marine mammals, the Government of Canada must also respect the land claims agreements it has signed with Canada’s Inuit. Under these agreements the co-management boards are responsible for wildlife management within the land claim area. In addition to protecting the rights of hunters to harvest, the land claims agreements also call for the development of management systems that respect the principles of conservation and ensure sustainability of the resource, potentially resulting in a management paradox. We present criteria by which the status of a population can be assessed, and an appropriate PA framework applied. If sufficient data are available to understand the population dynamics of a given stock (i.e., a Data Rich situation), management decisions can be based upon an appropriate population model with quantitatively estimated reference levels. In cases where the population dynamics are poorly understood (i.e., Data Poor), a more conservative approach, referred to as the Potential Biological Removal (PBR) should be used to provide advice on sustainable harvest levels. Generally, only the most recent estimate of abundance is used in the PBR calculation which may ignore other data. We propose that if sufficient data are available to fit a population model, while still not sufficient to be considered Data Rich, the modelled estimate of current abundance can be used for a more robust PBR estimate. We also review guidelines for the choice of the recovery factor which is part of the PBR calculation. The apparent management paradox can be addressed within the context of a Management Procedure or Management Strategy Evaluation where Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science can contribute to setting management objectives, decision rules and appropriate time-frames that can be evaluated within a simulation environment. 
将预防方法应用于加拿大北部海洋哺乳动物的管理
加拿大致力于采用预防方法 (PA) 管理其资源。然而,在对北极海洋哺乳动物采用这种方法时,加拿大政府还必须尊重它与加拿大因纽特人签署的土地权属协议。根据这些协议,共同管理委员会负责土地权属区内的野生动物管理。除了保护猎人的捕猎权之外,土地权属协议还要求制定尊重保护原则并确保资源可持续性的管理制度,这可能会造成管理上的矛盾。我们提出了评估种群状况的标准,并应用了适当的保护区框架。如果有足够的数据来了解特定种群的种群动态(即数据丰富的情况),管理决策可基于适当的种群模型和量化估算的参考水平。如果对种群动态知之甚少(即数据贫乏),则应采用更为保守的方法,即潜在生物去除量(PBR),为可持续捕捞量提供建议。一般来说,在计算潜在生物去除量时,只使用最新的丰度估计值,而可能忽略其他数据。我们建议,如果有足够的数据可用于拟合一个种群模型,但仍不足以被视为数据丰富,则可将当前丰度的模型估算值用于更稳健的 PBR 估算值。我们还回顾了作为 PBR 计算一部分的恢复因子的选择准则。这一明显的管理悖论可以在管理程序或管理战略评估的背景下加以解决,在此背景下,本土知识和西方科学可以为设定管理目标、决策规则和适当的时间框架做出贡献,这些都可以在模拟环境中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信