Advancing Stratification Research by Measuring Non-declarative Cultural Capital: A National Population-Based Study Combining IAT and Survey Data

Jeroen van der Waal, W. de Koster, T. van Meurs, K. Noordzij, J. O. Groeniger, Julian Schaap
{"title":"Advancing Stratification Research by Measuring Non-declarative Cultural Capital: A National Population-Based Study Combining IAT and Survey Data","authors":"Jeroen van der Waal, W. de Koster, T. van Meurs, K. Noordzij, J. O. Groeniger, Julian Schaap","doi":"10.1177/00031224241261603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultural capital is a central concept in stratification research. Crucial to the Bourdieusian habitus, upper strata familiarity with the dominant culture is assumed to be ingrained via socialization, allowing its members to smoothly navigate educational institutions and higher segments of the labor market. Although cultural capital is deemed partially implicit, such “non-declarative” or “embodied” cultural capital has largely escaped empirical scrutiny; arguments about its importance are typically post hoc interpretations of associations between measures of declarative cultural capital (survey items on elite cultural consumption) and variables of interest. To advance stratification research, we developed tools to empirically capture non-declarative cultural capital: Implicit Association Tests (IATs) measuring (1) positive association and (2) self-identification with elite culture, embedded in a survey fielded among a high-quality panel representative of the Dutch population ( n = 2,436). We find our IATs validly measure non-declarative cultural capital. As expected, scores are only weakly coupled with declarative cultural capital, and associated with (parental) socioeconomic position. Using these IATs liberates non-declarative cultural capital from its deus ex machina status and answers the black-box critique of the Bourdieusian habitus as an explanation for socially stratified patterns across a range of fields.","PeriodicalId":504789,"journal":{"name":"American Sociological Review","volume":"54 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224241261603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural capital is a central concept in stratification research. Crucial to the Bourdieusian habitus, upper strata familiarity with the dominant culture is assumed to be ingrained via socialization, allowing its members to smoothly navigate educational institutions and higher segments of the labor market. Although cultural capital is deemed partially implicit, such “non-declarative” or “embodied” cultural capital has largely escaped empirical scrutiny; arguments about its importance are typically post hoc interpretations of associations between measures of declarative cultural capital (survey items on elite cultural consumption) and variables of interest. To advance stratification research, we developed tools to empirically capture non-declarative cultural capital: Implicit Association Tests (IATs) measuring (1) positive association and (2) self-identification with elite culture, embedded in a survey fielded among a high-quality panel representative of the Dutch population ( n = 2,436). We find our IATs validly measure non-declarative cultural capital. As expected, scores are only weakly coupled with declarative cultural capital, and associated with (parental) socioeconomic position. Using these IATs liberates non-declarative cultural capital from its deus ex machina status and answers the black-box critique of the Bourdieusian habitus as an explanation for socially stratified patterns across a range of fields.
通过测量非宣言性文化资本推进分层研究:结合 IAT 和调查数据的全国人口研究
文化资本是分层研究中的一个核心概念。布尔迪厄斯惯习理论认为,上层社会对主流文化的熟悉程度是通过社会化而根深蒂固的,这对上层社会成员顺利进入教育机构和劳动力市场的更高层次至关重要。尽管文化资本被认为是部分隐性的,但这种 "非宣言性 "或 "体现性 "的文化资本在很大程度上没有得到实证的检验;关于其重要性的论点通常是对宣言性文化资本(精英文化消费调查项目)与相关变量之间关联的事后解释。为了推进分层研究,我们开发了一些工具,从经验上捕捉非宣言性文化资本:内隐关联测试(IATs)测量(1)积极关联和(2)对精英文化的自我认同,并将其嵌入到对荷兰人口(n = 2,436)进行的高质量小组调查中。我们发现,我们的 IATs 能够有效测量非宣言性文化资本。正如我们所预期的那样,得分与陈述性文化资本只有微弱的联系,并且与(父母的)社会经济地位有关。使用这些 IATs 可以将非宣言性文化资本从其神化的地位中解放出来,并回应了对布尔迪厄斯习性(Bourdieusian habitus)的黑箱批评,将其解释为一系列领域的社会分层模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信