Gender-based violence and femicide interventions-perspectives from community members and activists in South Africa

Sibusiso Mkwananzi, Motlalepule Nathane-Taulela
{"title":"Gender-based violence and femicide interventions-perspectives from community members and activists in South Africa","authors":"Sibusiso Mkwananzi, Motlalepule Nathane-Taulela","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1199743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, Gender-Based Violence and Femicide (GBVF) remains a multifaceted social issue in the 21st century. Despite the ratification of international treaties and national laws, South Africa continues to have alarmingly high levels of GBVF, which were worsened during the Covid-19 national lockdown. The 2020 crime statistics reported that one in five South African women were victims of GBVF and South African Police Services (SAPS) data from 2015 to 2020 showed that seven women are killed daily nationwide. Despite copious studies on GBVF, the voices of local community members and activists as key collaborators in such research have been excluded. Therefore, this study used a mixed methods approach to determine the known interventions to decrease or eliminate GBVF and their effectiveness in seven communities across South Africa. The study included 191 participants in a survey for the quantitative aspect as well as a qualitative aspect of the study. Community members participated in gender-specific focus group discussions, while activists had a focus group of their own to obtain data on interventions. Our findings showed that three main forms of interventions existed in South Africa, viz. government-led campaigns that normally occurred during the 16 days of activism against violence towards women and children, community-led campaigns in response to GBVF cases reported in the media as well as NGO-led initiatives to support GBV survivors. However, these interventions were stifled by the social and cultural stigma against reporting GBVF, a lack of sustainability, decreased visibility, poor organisation and management as well as a lack of funding. Therefore, our findings show that while the South African government has made strides in its efforts to eliminate GBVF, there are no sustainable community level programming and interventions aimed at changing social norms and toxic masculinity that perpetuate GBVF. In conclusion, we recommend that efforts be made to implement intervention initiatives that go beyond creating awareness on GBVF, but partner with local NGO-led organizations to engage in programming and intervention that is aimed at changing social norms.","PeriodicalId":504610,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Global Women's Health","volume":"51 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Global Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1199743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, Gender-Based Violence and Femicide (GBVF) remains a multifaceted social issue in the 21st century. Despite the ratification of international treaties and national laws, South Africa continues to have alarmingly high levels of GBVF, which were worsened during the Covid-19 national lockdown. The 2020 crime statistics reported that one in five South African women were victims of GBVF and South African Police Services (SAPS) data from 2015 to 2020 showed that seven women are killed daily nationwide. Despite copious studies on GBVF, the voices of local community members and activists as key collaborators in such research have been excluded. Therefore, this study used a mixed methods approach to determine the known interventions to decrease or eliminate GBVF and their effectiveness in seven communities across South Africa. The study included 191 participants in a survey for the quantitative aspect as well as a qualitative aspect of the study. Community members participated in gender-specific focus group discussions, while activists had a focus group of their own to obtain data on interventions. Our findings showed that three main forms of interventions existed in South Africa, viz. government-led campaigns that normally occurred during the 16 days of activism against violence towards women and children, community-led campaigns in response to GBVF cases reported in the media as well as NGO-led initiatives to support GBV survivors. However, these interventions were stifled by the social and cultural stigma against reporting GBVF, a lack of sustainability, decreased visibility, poor organisation and management as well as a lack of funding. Therefore, our findings show that while the South African government has made strides in its efforts to eliminate GBVF, there are no sustainable community level programming and interventions aimed at changing social norms and toxic masculinity that perpetuate GBVF. In conclusion, we recommend that efforts be made to implement intervention initiatives that go beyond creating awareness on GBVF, but partner with local NGO-led organizations to engage in programming and intervention that is aimed at changing social norms.
基于性别的暴力和杀害妇女干预措施--南非社区成员和活动家的观点
在全球范围内,基于性别的暴力和杀害妇女(GBVF)仍然是 21 世纪一个多层面的社会问题。尽管南非批准了多项国际条约和国家法律,但基于性别的暴力和杀戮(GBVF)的发生率仍然高得惊人,在 Covid-19 全国封锁期间,这一问题更加严重。2020 年犯罪统计报告显示,每五名南非妇女中就有一名是性别暴力和家庭暴力的受害者,南非警察署(SAPS)2015 年至 2020 年的数据显示,全国每天有七名妇女被杀害。尽管对基于性别的暴力和家庭暴力进行了大量研究,但作为此类研究的主要合作者,当地社区成员和活动家的声音却被排除在外。因此,本研究采用了混合方法,以确定南非七个社区减少或消除性别暴力和家庭暴力的已知干预措施及其有效性。共有 191 人参与了定量和定性方面的调查。社区成员参加了针对不同性别的焦点小组讨论,而活动家们则自己组织了一个焦点小组,以获取有关干预措施的数据。我们的研究结果表明,南非主要存在三种形式的干预措施,即通常在 16 天反对暴力侵害妇女和儿童行动期间开展的由政府主导的运动、针对媒体报道的基于性别的暴力侵害妇女和儿童案件开展的由社区主导的运动,以及由非政府组织主导的支持基于性别的暴力幸存者的倡议。然而,由于社会和文化对报告基于性别的暴力的污名化、缺乏可持续性、知名度下降、组织和管理不善以及缺乏资金等原因,这些干预措施受到了抑制。因此,我们的研究结果表明,虽然南非政府在消除性别暴力和家庭暴力的努力中取得了长足进步,但却没有可持续的社区层面的计划和干预措施来改变导致性别暴力和家庭暴力长期存在的社会规范和有毒的大男子主义。总之,我们建议努力实施干预措施,这些措施不仅要提高人们对基于性别的暴力和家庭暴力的认识,还要与当地非政府组织合作,参与旨在改变社会规范的计划和干预活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信