Observation-inferred resilience loss of the Amazon rainforest possibly due to internal climate variability

Raphael Grodofzig, M. Renoult, Thorsten Mauritsen
{"title":"Observation-inferred resilience loss of the Amazon rainforest possibly due to internal climate variability","authors":"Raphael Grodofzig, M. Renoult, Thorsten Mauritsen","doi":"10.5194/esd-15-913-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Recent observation-based studies suggest that the Amazon rainforest has lost substantial resilience since 1990, indicating that the forest might undergo a critical transition in the near future due to global warming and deforestation. The idea is to use trends in a lag-1 auto-correlation of leaf density as an early-warning signal of an imminent critical threshold for rainforest dieback. Here we test whether the observed change in auto-correlations could arise from internal variability using historical and control simulations of nine sixth-generation Earth system model ensembles (Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, CMIP6). We quantify trends in the leaf area index auto-correlation from both models and satellite-observed vegetation optical depth from 1990 to 2017. Four models reproduce the observed trend with at least one historical realization whereby the observations lie at the upper limit of model variability. Three out of these four models exhibit similar behavior in control runs, suggesting that historical forcing is not necessary for simulating the observed trends. Furthermore, we do not observe a critical transition in any future runs under the strongest greenhouse gas emission scenario (SSP5-8.5) until 2100 in the four models that best reproduce the past observed trends. Hence, the currently observed trends could be caused simply by internal variability and, unless the data records are extended, have limited applicability as an early-warning signal. Our results suggest that the current rapid decline in the Amazon rainforest coverage is not foremost caused by global warming.\n","PeriodicalId":504863,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-913-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Recent observation-based studies suggest that the Amazon rainforest has lost substantial resilience since 1990, indicating that the forest might undergo a critical transition in the near future due to global warming and deforestation. The idea is to use trends in a lag-1 auto-correlation of leaf density as an early-warning signal of an imminent critical threshold for rainforest dieback. Here we test whether the observed change in auto-correlations could arise from internal variability using historical and control simulations of nine sixth-generation Earth system model ensembles (Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, CMIP6). We quantify trends in the leaf area index auto-correlation from both models and satellite-observed vegetation optical depth from 1990 to 2017. Four models reproduce the observed trend with at least one historical realization whereby the observations lie at the upper limit of model variability. Three out of these four models exhibit similar behavior in control runs, suggesting that historical forcing is not necessary for simulating the observed trends. Furthermore, we do not observe a critical transition in any future runs under the strongest greenhouse gas emission scenario (SSP5-8.5) until 2100 in the four models that best reproduce the past observed trends. Hence, the currently observed trends could be caused simply by internal variability and, unless the data records are extended, have limited applicability as an early-warning signal. Our results suggest that the current rapid decline in the Amazon rainforest coverage is not foremost caused by global warming.
观测推断可能因内部气候变异造成的亚马逊雨林复原力丧失
摘要最近基于观测的研究表明,亚马逊雨林自 1990 年以来已经丧失了大量的恢复力,这表明由于全球变暖和森林砍伐,雨林在不久的将来可能会出现临界转变。我们的想法是利用叶片密度的滞后-1 自相关趋势作为预警信号,预示雨林枯死的临界点即将到来。在此,我们利用九个第六代地球系统模式集合(耦合模式相互比较项目第 6 阶段,CMIP6)的历史模拟和控制模拟,检验观察到的自相关性变化是否来自内部变异。我们从模型和卫星观测到的植被光学深度量化了 1990 至 2017 年叶面积指数自相关的趋势。四个模型重现了观测到的趋势,其中至少有一个历史实现,观测结果位于模型变异性的上限。在这四个模型中,有三个模型在对照运行中表现出类似的行为,这表明模拟观测到的趋势并不需要历史强迫。此外,在最强温室气体排放情景(SSP5-8.5)下的任何未来运行中,我们都没有观测到临界过渡,直到 2100 年,这四个模式都能最好地再现过去观测到的趋势。因此,目前观测到的趋势可能仅仅是由内部变异引起的,除非数据记录得到扩展,否则作为预警信号的适用性有限。我们的研究结果表明,目前亚马逊雨林覆盖率的快速下降并不完全是由全球变暖引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信