Prevalence and Risk Factors of Multidrug Resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli Isolated from Milk of Small Scale Dairy Buffaloes in Rupandehi, Nepal

Anil Gautam, Sirjan Bastola, Keshav Lamsal, Krishna Kaphle, Prajjwal Shrestha, Shambhu Shah, D. Subedi
{"title":"Prevalence and Risk Factors of Multidrug Resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli Isolated from Milk of Small Scale Dairy Buffaloes in Rupandehi, Nepal","authors":"Anil Gautam, Sirjan Bastola, Keshav Lamsal, Krishna Kaphle, Prajjwal Shrestha, Shambhu Shah, D. Subedi","doi":"10.3390/zoonoticdis4030016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Escherichia coli in untreated milk leads to economic losses from subclinical mastitis and reduced milk production, while also posing a public health risk due to the emergence of antimicrobial resistant strains, particularly associated with consuming unpasteurized milk and dairy products. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of E. coli isolated from buffalo milk in Siddarthanagar Municipality of Rupandehi district, Nepal. A total of 102 milk samples were collected from lactating buffaloes. The isolation and identification of E. coli were carried out using enrichment media, selective media, and biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (Merck), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. Resistance was tested against gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol. In addition to this, farmers were administered a questionnaire consisting of both open- and close-ended questions to identify various animal-related and management-related risk factors associated with the prevalence of E. coli. The prevalence of E. coli in our study was 29.4% (n = 30/102). Ceftriaxone and ceftazidime showed 100% resistance, while cotrimoxazole and amikacin showed 86.7% and 80% resistance, respectively. Furthermore, 86.7% of E. coli isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR). Despite suggestive trends, associations between E. coli prevalence and risk factors lacked statistical significance, necessitating further research. While some antibiotics exhibited effectiveness, many faced resistance, highlighting the need for prudent antimicrobial usage and increased awareness among farmers. Raising awareness about milk pasteurization and implementing food safety practices is essential for ensuring farmers and public health.","PeriodicalId":515439,"journal":{"name":"Zoonotic Diseases","volume":"62 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoonotic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis4030016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Escherichia coli in untreated milk leads to economic losses from subclinical mastitis and reduced milk production, while also posing a public health risk due to the emergence of antimicrobial resistant strains, particularly associated with consuming unpasteurized milk and dairy products. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of E. coli isolated from buffalo milk in Siddarthanagar Municipality of Rupandehi district, Nepal. A total of 102 milk samples were collected from lactating buffaloes. The isolation and identification of E. coli were carried out using enrichment media, selective media, and biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (Merck), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. Resistance was tested against gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol. In addition to this, farmers were administered a questionnaire consisting of both open- and close-ended questions to identify various animal-related and management-related risk factors associated with the prevalence of E. coli. The prevalence of E. coli in our study was 29.4% (n = 30/102). Ceftriaxone and ceftazidime showed 100% resistance, while cotrimoxazole and amikacin showed 86.7% and 80% resistance, respectively. Furthermore, 86.7% of E. coli isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR). Despite suggestive trends, associations between E. coli prevalence and risk factors lacked statistical significance, necessitating further research. While some antibiotics exhibited effectiveness, many faced resistance, highlighting the need for prudent antimicrobial usage and increased awareness among farmers. Raising awareness about milk pasteurization and implementing food safety practices is essential for ensuring farmers and public health.
尼泊尔鲁潘德希小规模奶牛牛奶中分离出的耐多药(MDR)大肠埃希菌的流行率和风险因素
未经处理的牛奶中的大肠埃希氏菌会导致亚临床乳腺炎和牛奶产量下降,造成经济损失,同时由于抗菌药耐药菌株的出现,也会带来公共卫生风险,特别是与食用未经巴氏杀菌的牛奶和乳制品有关。本研究旨在确定从尼泊尔 Rupandehi 县 Siddarthanagar 市的水牛奶中分离出的大肠杆菌的流行率和抗菌药耐药性 (AMR)。研究人员从哺乳期水牛身上共采集了 102 份牛奶样本。利用富集培养基、选择性培养基和生化测试对大肠杆菌进行了分离和鉴定。根据临床和实验室标准研究所(CLSI)的建议,在穆勒-欣顿琼脂(默克)上使用柯比-鲍尔盘扩散法进行抗菌药敏感性测试。对庆大霉素、阿米卡星、环丙沙星、恩诺沙星、头孢曲松、头孢唑肟、复方新诺明和氯霉素进行了抗药性测试。此外,还向养殖户发放了由开放式和封闭式问题组成的调查问卷,以确定与大肠杆菌流行有关的各种动物相关和管理相关风险因素。在我们的研究中,大肠杆菌的感染率为 29.4%(n = 30/102)。头孢曲松和头孢他啶的耐药性为 100%,而复方新诺明和阿米卡星的耐药性分别为 86.7% 和 80%。此外,86.7%的大肠杆菌分离物具有多重耐药性(MDR)。尽管存在提示性趋势,但大肠杆菌感染率与风险因素之间的关联缺乏统计学意义,因此有必要开展进一步研究。虽然一些抗生素显示出了有效性,但许多抗生素也面临耐药性问题,这突出表明需要谨慎使用抗菌素并提高农民的认识。提高对牛奶巴氏杀菌的认识和实施食品安全规范对确保农民和公众健康至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信