From choosing sides to changing minds: A taxonomy of behavioral responses to social network disapproval of one’s romantic relationship and evidence for the importance of commitment

Kirby N Sigler, Amanda L. Forest
{"title":"From choosing sides to changing minds: A taxonomy of behavioral responses to social network disapproval of one’s romantic relationship and evidence for the importance of commitment","authors":"Kirby N Sigler, Amanda L. Forest","doi":"10.1177/02654075241262811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social network approval of romantic relationships positively predicts relational satisfaction, commitment, and stability; social network disapproval of one’s romantic relationship (SND-RR) may pose a threat to relationships. How do people navigate this threat? We sought to develop a taxonomy of behavioral responses to SND-RR and to examine whether commitment to one’s romantic partner or to a disapprover predicts these responses. In three studies, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and correlational and experimental methods, we identified seven categories of behavioral responses that people employ in the face of SND-RR (distance from partner, draw closer to partner, distance from disapprover, draw closer to disapprover, elude disapproval, address disapproval, and ignore disapproval). Across studies, commitment to a romantic partner and/or disapprover predicted participants’ endorsement of behavioral responses. These findings lay the foundation for work considering how people might constructively navigate SND-RR.","PeriodicalId":508458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241262811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social network approval of romantic relationships positively predicts relational satisfaction, commitment, and stability; social network disapproval of one’s romantic relationship (SND-RR) may pose a threat to relationships. How do people navigate this threat? We sought to develop a taxonomy of behavioral responses to SND-RR and to examine whether commitment to one’s romantic partner or to a disapprover predicts these responses. In three studies, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and correlational and experimental methods, we identified seven categories of behavioral responses that people employ in the face of SND-RR (distance from partner, draw closer to partner, distance from disapprover, draw closer to disapprover, elude disapproval, address disapproval, and ignore disapproval). Across studies, commitment to a romantic partner and/or disapprover predicted participants’ endorsement of behavioral responses. These findings lay the foundation for work considering how people might constructively navigate SND-RR.
从选边站到改变想法:对社交网络不认可个人恋爱关系的行为反应分类法以及承诺重要性的证据
社交网络对恋爱关系的认可可以积极地预测恋爱关系的满意度、承诺和稳定性;社交网络对恋爱关系的不认可(SND-RR)可能会对恋爱关系构成威胁。人们如何应对这种威胁?我们试图对 SND-RR 的行为反应进行分类,并研究对恋爱伴侣的承诺或对不认可者的承诺是否会预测这些反应。在三项研究中,我们利用探索性和确认性因素分析以及相关和实验方法,确定了人们在面对 SND-RR 时所采取的七类行为反应(远离伴侣、拉近与伴侣的距离、远离不认同者、拉近与不认同者的距离、逃避不认同、正视不认同和忽视不认同)。在所有研究中,对恋爱对象和/或不认同者的承诺都会影响参与者对行为反应的认可。这些发现为研究人们如何建设性地驾驭 SND-RR 奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信