Review on Socio-Ecological Contribution of Agroforestry Practices in Ethiopia

Gonche Girma
{"title":"Review on Socio-Ecological Contribution of Agroforestry Practices in Ethiopia","authors":"Gonche Girma","doi":"10.37284/eajfa.7.1.2060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agroforestry is often defined as a practice that provides multiple economic, social, and ecological benefits. It is a novel approach that can safeguard agricultural sustainability, provide livelihood opportunities, yield ecological benefits, and contribute to household food security. However, comprehensive studies on the socio-ecological contributions of agroforestry are limited due to a lack of evidence. Therefore, a comprehensive review was conducted to analyze and compile various fragmented findings into one cohesive piece of evidence. The review utilized both qualitative and quantitative approaches to explore the socio-economic and ecological components of agroforestry. The findings revealed that there are different integration levels of tree components with crops or livestock within the three agroforestry systems (agrosilvopastoral, silvopastoral, and agrisilvicultural). Dominant agroforestry practices in various regions of Ethiopia include home gardens, hedgerows, intercropping, perennial tree-crop systems, woodlots, scattered trees on farms, and parkland agroforestry. Agroforestry provides socioeconomic benefits through timber and non-timber tree products, as well as improved crop yields compared to monocrops. Additionally, agroforestry plays a role in soil and water management, carbon sequestration, deforestation reduction, and biodiversity preservation. The review indicated that agroforestry can store 61-85% or 2.1-115.7 Mg of carbon per hectare. Various socio-economic, institutional, and biophysical factors influence different agroforestry practices. The review results suggest that policymakers and extension agents should consider these contextual factors and potential benefits to encourage the wider expansion of agroforestry practices","PeriodicalId":373486,"journal":{"name":"East African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37284/eajfa.7.1.2060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry is often defined as a practice that provides multiple economic, social, and ecological benefits. It is a novel approach that can safeguard agricultural sustainability, provide livelihood opportunities, yield ecological benefits, and contribute to household food security. However, comprehensive studies on the socio-ecological contributions of agroforestry are limited due to a lack of evidence. Therefore, a comprehensive review was conducted to analyze and compile various fragmented findings into one cohesive piece of evidence. The review utilized both qualitative and quantitative approaches to explore the socio-economic and ecological components of agroforestry. The findings revealed that there are different integration levels of tree components with crops or livestock within the three agroforestry systems (agrosilvopastoral, silvopastoral, and agrisilvicultural). Dominant agroforestry practices in various regions of Ethiopia include home gardens, hedgerows, intercropping, perennial tree-crop systems, woodlots, scattered trees on farms, and parkland agroforestry. Agroforestry provides socioeconomic benefits through timber and non-timber tree products, as well as improved crop yields compared to monocrops. Additionally, agroforestry plays a role in soil and water management, carbon sequestration, deforestation reduction, and biodiversity preservation. The review indicated that agroforestry can store 61-85% or 2.1-115.7 Mg of carbon per hectare. Various socio-economic, institutional, and biophysical factors influence different agroforestry practices. The review results suggest that policymakers and extension agents should consider these contextual factors and potential benefits to encourage the wider expansion of agroforestry practices
埃塞俄比亚农林业做法的社会生态贡献综述
农林业通常被定义为一种可提供多种经济、社会和生态效益的做法。它是一种新颖的方法,可以保障农业的可持续性,提供谋生机会,产生生态效益,并有助于家庭粮食安全。然而,由于缺乏证据,有关农林业的社会生态贡献的全面研究十分有限。因此,我们进行了一次全面审查,以分析各种零散的研究结果,并将其汇编成一份具有凝聚力的证据。审查采用了定性和定量方法来探讨农林业的社会经济和生态组成部分。研究结果表明,在三种农林系统(农林牧、林牧和农耕)中,树木成分与作物或牲畜的融合程度不同。埃塞俄比亚各地区主要的农林业做法包括家庭菜园、树篱、间作、多年生树木-作物系统、林地、农场零星树木和园地农林业。农林业通过木材和非木材林产品提供社会经济效益,与单一作物相比,还能提高作物产量。此外,农林业还在水土管理、碳固存、减少毁林和保护生物多样性方面发挥作用。审查表明,农林业可储存 61-85%或每公顷 2.1-1.157 兆克的碳。各种社会经济、制度和生物物理因素影响着不同的农林业实践。审查结果表明,决策者和推广人员应考虑这些背景因素和潜在效益,以鼓励更广泛地推广农林业做法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信