Conspiracy Theories as Productive Practices: Toward a Theory of Conspiratorial Style, Agency, and Politics

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Erol Sağlam
{"title":"Conspiracy Theories as Productive Practices: Toward a Theory of Conspiratorial Style, Agency, and Politics","authors":"Erol Sağlam","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anthro-041422-125802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews anthropological explorations of conspiracy theories—in dialogue with insights from other disciplines, primarily political science, philosophy, and social psychology—to frame conspiracy theories as productive social practices. While conspiracy theories are often depicted through their epistemological shortcomings and associated with social and political margins, this article traces the nascent threads across anthropological scholarship to reach an emic understanding of those narratives and their sociopolitical reverberations and proposes approaching conspiracy theories through their style, agentive implications, and political effects. Conspiratorial style, the article argues, pertains not to the content of the narrative but to its incessant seeking of covert operations beyond readily visible forms as well as a growing flexibility regarding the narrator's belief in the narrative's veracity. The agentivizing dynamic generated through conspiracism differentiates contemporary conspiracism from its predecessors and involves an empowering dynamic. Finally, the article focuses on how contemporary conspiracism is intricately linked to political contestations.","PeriodicalId":48296,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041422-125802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviews anthropological explorations of conspiracy theories—in dialogue with insights from other disciplines, primarily political science, philosophy, and social psychology—to frame conspiracy theories as productive social practices. While conspiracy theories are often depicted through their epistemological shortcomings and associated with social and political margins, this article traces the nascent threads across anthropological scholarship to reach an emic understanding of those narratives and their sociopolitical reverberations and proposes approaching conspiracy theories through their style, agentive implications, and political effects. Conspiratorial style, the article argues, pertains not to the content of the narrative but to its incessant seeking of covert operations beyond readily visible forms as well as a growing flexibility regarding the narrator's belief in the narrative's veracity. The agentivizing dynamic generated through conspiracism differentiates contemporary conspiracism from its predecessors and involves an empowering dynamic. Finally, the article focuses on how contemporary conspiracism is intricately linked to political contestations.
作为生产实践的阴谋论:作为生产实践的阴谋论:走向阴谋论风格、代理和政治理论
本文回顾了人类学对阴谋论的探索--与其他学科(主要是政治学、哲学和社会心理学)的见解进行对话--将阴谋论定格为富有成效的社会实践。阴谋论通常被描述为认识论上的缺陷,并与社会和政治边缘联系在一起,本文追溯了人类学学术研究的新线索,以达到对这些叙事及其社会政治反响的理解,并建议通过阴谋论的风格、代理含义和政治效果来探讨阴谋论。文章认为,阴谋论的风格与叙事的内容无关,而是与叙事者不断寻求显而易见的形式之外的隐蔽行动以及叙事者对叙事真实性日益灵活的信念有关。阴谋论所产生的代理化动力将当代阴谋论与其前身区分开来,并涉及一种赋权动力。最后,文章重点论述了当代阴谋论如何与政治争论错综复杂地联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信