Towards a new conceptualisation of evidence-based human resource management

Lisa Maertens, Ellen Daniëls, Annie Hondeghem, W. Vandenabeele
{"title":"Towards a new conceptualisation of evidence-based human resource management","authors":"Lisa Maertens, Ellen Daniëls, Annie Hondeghem, W. Vandenabeele","doi":"10.1108/joepp-12-2023-0541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeNotwithstanding that evidence-based human resource management (EBHRM) is gaining more ground in governmental institutions, it is still lacking a clear and research-driven conceptualisation (Marler and Fisher, 2013). Therefore, this study seeks to establish a fundamental clarifying concept of EBHRM by using a systematic literature review.Design/methodology/approachThis method builds on an intensive scanning of 2,584 (interdisciplinary) articles, collected from Web of Science and Scopus. Eventually, 50 articles met the predetermined inclusion criteria and were analysed. The most recent conceptualisation of evidence-based management in the literature has served as a guideline to compare the review results and further scrutinise the differences and similarities (Barends et al., 2014; Barends and Rousseau, 2018; Rynes and Bartunek, 2017).FindingsThis has enabled us to elaborate a comprehensive conceptualisation. The articles were divided into two groups, one group (n = 31) has Rousseau et al. as a reference, the other (n = 19) did not, and used various definitions. Three themes were identified: evidence-based research methods (n = 30), specific skills (n = 36) necessary to apply an evidence-based strategy and a link with the academic-practice gap (n = 25).Practical implicationsBased on the results, we recommend adding two dimensions to strengthen the current conceptualisation: a first dimension referring to how evidence-based management can be established (i.e. which methods and skills are necessary) and a second dimension referring to the why of evidence-based management in an organisation (reducing the academic-practice gap).Originality/valueThis paper starts from a systematic review approach unlike previous research in the field to contribute to the further conceptualisation of EBHRM (Rynes and Bartunek, 2017).","PeriodicalId":514623,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance","volume":"26 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-12-2023-0541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeNotwithstanding that evidence-based human resource management (EBHRM) is gaining more ground in governmental institutions, it is still lacking a clear and research-driven conceptualisation (Marler and Fisher, 2013). Therefore, this study seeks to establish a fundamental clarifying concept of EBHRM by using a systematic literature review.Design/methodology/approachThis method builds on an intensive scanning of 2,584 (interdisciplinary) articles, collected from Web of Science and Scopus. Eventually, 50 articles met the predetermined inclusion criteria and were analysed. The most recent conceptualisation of evidence-based management in the literature has served as a guideline to compare the review results and further scrutinise the differences and similarities (Barends et al., 2014; Barends and Rousseau, 2018; Rynes and Bartunek, 2017).FindingsThis has enabled us to elaborate a comprehensive conceptualisation. The articles were divided into two groups, one group (n = 31) has Rousseau et al. as a reference, the other (n = 19) did not, and used various definitions. Three themes were identified: evidence-based research methods (n = 30), specific skills (n = 36) necessary to apply an evidence-based strategy and a link with the academic-practice gap (n = 25).Practical implicationsBased on the results, we recommend adding two dimensions to strengthen the current conceptualisation: a first dimension referring to how evidence-based management can be established (i.e. which methods and skills are necessary) and a second dimension referring to the why of evidence-based management in an organisation (reducing the academic-practice gap).Originality/valueThis paper starts from a systematic review approach unlike previous research in the field to contribute to the further conceptualisation of EBHRM (Rynes and Bartunek, 2017).
实现循证人力资源管理的新概念化
目的尽管循证人力资源管理(EBHRM)在政府机构中的地位日益提高,但它仍然缺乏一个明确的、以研究为导向的概念(Marler 和 Fisher,2013 年)。因此,本研究试图通过系统性的文献综述来建立基于证据的人力资源管理(EBHRM)的基本明确概念。设计/方法/途径本方法基于对从 Web of Science 和 Scopus 收集的 2,584 篇(跨学科)文章的深入扫描。最终,有 50 篇文章符合预定的纳入标准并进行了分析。文献中关于循证管理的最新概念是比较审查结果和进一步审查异同的指南(Barends 等人,2014 年;Barends 和 Rousseau,2018 年;Rynes 和 Bartunek,2017 年)。文章被分为两组,一组(n = 31)以 Rousseau 等人为参考,另一组(n = 19)没有,并使用了不同的定义。我们确定了三个主题:循证研究方法(n = 30)、应用循证策略所需的特定技能(n = 36)以及与学术-实践差距之间的联系(n = 25)。原创性/价值本文从系统回顾的方法出发,与该领域以往的研究不同,有助于进一步将 EBHRM 概念化(Rynes 和 Bartunek,2017 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信