Following the Impact Chain of the LA Cockpit

Onur Karademir, Lena Borgards, Daniele Di Mitri, Sebastian Strauß, Marcus Kubsch, Markus Brobeil, Adrian Grimm, Sebastian Gombert, N. Rummel, Knut Neumann, Hendrik Drachsler
{"title":"Following the Impact Chain of the LA Cockpit","authors":"Onur Karademir, Lena Borgards, Daniele Di Mitri, Sebastian Strauß, Marcus Kubsch, Markus Brobeil, Adrian Grimm, Sebastian Gombert, N. Rummel, Knut Neumann, Hendrik Drachsler","doi":"10.18608/jla.2024.8399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a teacher dashboard intervention study in secondary school practice involving teachers (n = 16) with their classes (n = 22) and students (n = 403). A quasi-experimental treatment-control group design was implemented to compare student learning outcomes between classrooms where teachers did not have access to the dashboard and classrooms where teachers had access to the dashboard. We examined different points in the impact chain of the “LA Cockpit,” a teacher dashboard with a feedback system through which teachers can send feedback to their students on student learning. To investigate this impact chain from teacher use of dashboards to student learning, we analyzed 1) teachers’ perceived technology acceptance of the LA Cockpit, 2) teacher feedback practices using the LA Cockpit, and 3) student knowledge gains as measured by pre- and post-tests. The analysis of n = 355 feedback messages sent by teachers through the LA Cockpit revealed that the dashboard assists teachers in identifying students facing difficulties and that teachers mostly provided process feedback, which is known to be effective for student learning. For student learning, significantly higher knowledge gains were found in the teacher dashboard condition compared to the control condition.","PeriodicalId":506271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Analytics","volume":"27 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a teacher dashboard intervention study in secondary school practice involving teachers (n = 16) with their classes (n = 22) and students (n = 403). A quasi-experimental treatment-control group design was implemented to compare student learning outcomes between classrooms where teachers did not have access to the dashboard and classrooms where teachers had access to the dashboard. We examined different points in the impact chain of the “LA Cockpit,” a teacher dashboard with a feedback system through which teachers can send feedback to their students on student learning. To investigate this impact chain from teacher use of dashboards to student learning, we analyzed 1) teachers’ perceived technology acceptance of the LA Cockpit, 2) teacher feedback practices using the LA Cockpit, and 3) student knowledge gains as measured by pre- and post-tests. The analysis of n = 355 feedback messages sent by teachers through the LA Cockpit revealed that the dashboard assists teachers in identifying students facing difficulties and that teachers mostly provided process feedback, which is known to be effective for student learning. For student learning, significantly higher knowledge gains were found in the teacher dashboard condition compared to the control condition.
追踪洛杉矶驾驶舱的影响链
本文介绍了在中学实践中开展的教师仪表板干预研究,涉及教师(n = 16)及其班级(n = 22)和学生(n = 403)。我们采用了准实验性治疗-对照组设计,以比较教师未使用仪表板的教室与教师可使用仪表板的教室之间的学生学习成果。我们研究了 "LA Cockpit "影响链中的不同点,"LA Cockpit "是一个带有反馈系统的教师仪表板,教师可以通过它向学生发送有关学生学习情况的反馈。为了研究从教师使用仪表板到学生学习的影响链,我们分析了 1) 教师对 "LA Cockpit "的技术接受程度;2) 教师使用 "LA Cockpit "进行反馈的实践;3) 通过前测和后测衡量的学生知识收获。对教师通过洛杉矶驾驶舱发送的 n = 355 条反馈信息进行的分析表明,仪表板有助于教师发现面临困难的学生,而且教师大多提供过程反馈,这对学生的学习是有效的。在学生学习方面,与对照组相比,教师仪表板条件下的知识收益明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信