Critically unlearning about madness and distress: Reflections on social work education and activism in Ireland

Lydia Sapouna
{"title":"Critically unlearning about madness and distress: Reflections on social work education and activism in Ireland","authors":"Lydia Sapouna","doi":"10.58544/imsj.v2i1.6280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws from my involvement in critical social work education and my position as an aspiring ally of the Mad movement in the Irish context.  I use a reflexive auto-critique as a methodology to consider a significant shift in my engagement with Mad matters which has led to new ways of (un)learning critically about madness and distress in education and activism. This is a shift from celebrating criticality and inclusion strategies, and in particular service-user involvement in education, to problematising criticality and its potential to perpetuate power inequalities within mental health and education systems.  It is a shift from viewing critical education as a process of knowing about distress and Mad people to a process of knowing with and from Mad people, service-users, and survivors. The emerging field of Mad Studies provides a conceptual framework to inquire about knowledge and knowers, to consider issues of co-option and epistemic injustice, to focus on pedagogies for unlearning, to ask questions about representational politics and the complexities of being an engaged academic and Mad positive ally. Guided by Mad Studies as a mode of analysis, I recognise that inclusion of madness in university curricula can work in ways that continue to pathologise and subjugate Mad people. This is an unsettling recognition that leads to an interrogation of my own praxis as an academic and an aspiring ally of the Mad moment. I propose that prefigurative politics are central in these considerations as genuine engagements with mental health matters need to model the changes we aim to achieve. Engaging with the tensions of inclusion politics, the complexities of madness, and the unsettledness this engagement generates, can be a source of knowing through epistemic humility and a resource for networks of solidarity.","PeriodicalId":422025,"journal":{"name":"International Mad Studies Journal","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Mad Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58544/imsj.v2i1.6280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article draws from my involvement in critical social work education and my position as an aspiring ally of the Mad movement in the Irish context.  I use a reflexive auto-critique as a methodology to consider a significant shift in my engagement with Mad matters which has led to new ways of (un)learning critically about madness and distress in education and activism. This is a shift from celebrating criticality and inclusion strategies, and in particular service-user involvement in education, to problematising criticality and its potential to perpetuate power inequalities within mental health and education systems.  It is a shift from viewing critical education as a process of knowing about distress and Mad people to a process of knowing with and from Mad people, service-users, and survivors. The emerging field of Mad Studies provides a conceptual framework to inquire about knowledge and knowers, to consider issues of co-option and epistemic injustice, to focus on pedagogies for unlearning, to ask questions about representational politics and the complexities of being an engaged academic and Mad positive ally. Guided by Mad Studies as a mode of analysis, I recognise that inclusion of madness in university curricula can work in ways that continue to pathologise and subjugate Mad people. This is an unsettling recognition that leads to an interrogation of my own praxis as an academic and an aspiring ally of the Mad moment. I propose that prefigurative politics are central in these considerations as genuine engagements with mental health matters need to model the changes we aim to achieve. Engaging with the tensions of inclusion politics, the complexities of madness, and the unsettledness this engagement generates, can be a source of knowing through epistemic humility and a resource for networks of solidarity.
批判性地摒弃对疯狂和痛苦的学习:对爱尔兰社会工作教育和行动主义的思考
本文借鉴了我参与批判性社会工作教育的经历,以及我作为爱尔兰 "疯狂运动 "的志同道合者的立场。 我将反思性的自我批判作为一种方法论,来思考我在参与 "疯人院 "事务中的重大转变,这种转变导致了在教育和行动主义中以批判性的方式(非)学习有关疯人院和痛苦的新方法。这是从赞美批判性和全纳策略,尤其是服务使用者参与教育,转变为质疑批判性及其在心理健康和教育系统中延续权力不平等的可能性。 从将批判性教育视为了解痛苦和疯子的过程,转变为与疯子、服务使用者和幸存者共同了解并从他们那里了解的过程。新兴的 "疯人研究 "领域提供了一个概念框架,以探究知识和认知者,考虑共同占有和认识论不公正的问题,关注解除学习的教学法,提出关于代表性政治的问题,以及作为一名参与的学者和疯人积极盟友的复杂性。在 "疯狂研究 "这一分析模式的指导下,我认识到,将 "疯狂 "纳入大学课程的方式可能会继续将 "疯狂 "病理学化,并使 "疯狂 "人处于从属地位。这是一个令人不安的认识,它导致我对自己作为一名学者和一名渴望成为疯狂时刻盟友的实践进行审视。我建议,预示性政治是这些考虑的核心,因为真正参与精神健康事务需要为我们旨在实现的变革树立榜样。参与包容政治的紧张局势、疯狂的复杂性以及这种参与所产生的不安定感,可以通过认识论上的谦逊成为知识的源泉,成为团结网络的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信