The Contribution of Teacher Feedback to the Revision of Student’s Work in Primary and Secondary Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Angelos Charalampous, Maria Darra
{"title":"The Contribution of Teacher Feedback to the Revision of Student’s Work in Primary and Secondary Education: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Angelos Charalampous, Maria Darra","doi":"10.5296/ijld.v14i3.21991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teacher feedback is crucial in the teaching and learning process as it helps describe the learner's performance objectively and guides them in revising their work to improve academic performance. While previous reviews have provided valuable information on different types of feedback and their use, effectiveness, effects on learner learning, and pedagogical benefits at both teaching and learning levels, none have focused exclusively on the connection of feedback with revision. This systematic literature review was based on the revised PRISMA 2020 statement, a widely accepted set of guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. After removing duplicate studies and applying two levels of research to exclude studies based on title, abstract, inaccessibility, and not meeting quality criteria, 32 relevant surveys were found conducted in primary and secondary education from 2013-2023, assessing the contribution of teacher feedback to the revision of learners' work. The results showed that most studies found significant benefits from applying various types of feedback processes in successfully revising learners' work. These processes led to correcting errors, improving the quality of their texts, assimilating improvement strategies, and promoting receptivity among teachers and learners. Most research focused on language learning and related skills such as grammar, syntax, spelling, writing, and text comprehension, primarily using quasi-experimental interventions in English as a second and foreign language courses.","PeriodicalId":512006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning and Development","volume":"44 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v14i3.21991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teacher feedback is crucial in the teaching and learning process as it helps describe the learner's performance objectively and guides them in revising their work to improve academic performance. While previous reviews have provided valuable information on different types of feedback and their use, effectiveness, effects on learner learning, and pedagogical benefits at both teaching and learning levels, none have focused exclusively on the connection of feedback with revision. This systematic literature review was based on the revised PRISMA 2020 statement, a widely accepted set of guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. After removing duplicate studies and applying two levels of research to exclude studies based on title, abstract, inaccessibility, and not meeting quality criteria, 32 relevant surveys were found conducted in primary and secondary education from 2013-2023, assessing the contribution of teacher feedback to the revision of learners' work. The results showed that most studies found significant benefits from applying various types of feedback processes in successfully revising learners' work. These processes led to correcting errors, improving the quality of their texts, assimilating improvement strategies, and promoting receptivity among teachers and learners. Most research focused on language learning and related skills such as grammar, syntax, spelling, writing, and text comprehension, primarily using quasi-experimental interventions in English as a second and foreign language courses.
教师反馈对中小学学生作业批改的贡献:系统性文献综述
教师反馈在教学过程中至关重要,因为它有助于客观地描述学习者的表现,并指导他们修改作业以提高学习成绩。以往的综述就不同类型的反馈及其使用、有效性、对学习者学习的影响以及教学和学习层面的教学效益提供了有价值的信息,但没有一篇综述专门关注反馈与订正之间的联系。本系统性文献综述以修订后的 PRISMA 2020 声明为基础,该声明是一套广为接受的系统性综述和荟萃分析报告指南。在剔除重复研究并采用两级研究排除基于标题、摘要、无法访问和不符合质量标准的研究后,我们找到了 2013-2023 年期间在中小学教育中进行的 32 项相关调查,评估教师反馈对学生作业修改的贡献。结果显示,大多数研究发现,在成功修改学生作业的过程中,应用各种类型的反馈过程有显著的益处。这些过程有助于纠正错误、提高文章质量、吸收改进策略以及促进教师和学习者的接受能力。大多数研究集中于语言学习和相关技能,如语法、句法、拼写、写作和文本理解,主要是在英语作为第二语言和外语课程中使用准实验性干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信