Model-based assessment of climate change impact on inland flood risk at the German North Sea coast caused by compounding storm tide and precipitation events

Helge Bormann, Jenny Kebschull, Lidia Gaslikova, R. Weisse
{"title":"Model-based assessment of climate change impact on inland flood risk at the German North Sea coast caused by compounding storm tide and precipitation events","authors":"Helge Bormann, Jenny Kebschull, Lidia Gaslikova, R. Weisse","doi":"10.5194/nhess-24-2559-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In addition to storm tides, inland flooding due to intense rainfall has become an increasing threat at coastal lowlands. In particular, the coincidence of both types of events poses great challenges to regional water boards since their technical drainage capacities are limited. In this study, we analysed historical data and scenario-based simulations for gauge Knock near Emden at the German North Sea coast. The evaluation of observed inland flood events shows that mainly moderate storm tide series in combination with large-scale, intense precipitation led to an overload of inland drainage systems, whereas the highest individual storm tides or precipitation events alone could be handled well. Proactive risk management requires climate projections for the future. Therefore, a hydrological and a hydrodynamic ocean model were set up and driven by the same climate simulations to estimate future drainage system overloads. The evaluation of the simulations for the control period of two climate models confirms that the models can reproduce the generation mechanism of the compound events. The coincidence of storm tides and precipitation leads to the highest drainage system overloads, while system overload is also caused by intense rainfall events alone rather than by storm tides without intense precipitation. Scenario projections based on two climate models and two emission scenarios suggest that the intensity of compound events of rainfall and storm tides will increase consistently against the background of mean sea level rise for all investigated climate projections, while simulated system overload is higher for the RCP8.5 scenario compared to the RCP2.6 scenario. Comparable to the past, future compound events will cause more potential damage compared to single extreme events. The model results indicate an increasing frequency and intensity of inland drainage system overloads along the North Sea coast if timely adaptation measures are not taken.\n","PeriodicalId":508073,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","volume":"49 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2559-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. In addition to storm tides, inland flooding due to intense rainfall has become an increasing threat at coastal lowlands. In particular, the coincidence of both types of events poses great challenges to regional water boards since their technical drainage capacities are limited. In this study, we analysed historical data and scenario-based simulations for gauge Knock near Emden at the German North Sea coast. The evaluation of observed inland flood events shows that mainly moderate storm tide series in combination with large-scale, intense precipitation led to an overload of inland drainage systems, whereas the highest individual storm tides or precipitation events alone could be handled well. Proactive risk management requires climate projections for the future. Therefore, a hydrological and a hydrodynamic ocean model were set up and driven by the same climate simulations to estimate future drainage system overloads. The evaluation of the simulations for the control period of two climate models confirms that the models can reproduce the generation mechanism of the compound events. The coincidence of storm tides and precipitation leads to the highest drainage system overloads, while system overload is also caused by intense rainfall events alone rather than by storm tides without intense precipitation. Scenario projections based on two climate models and two emission scenarios suggest that the intensity of compound events of rainfall and storm tides will increase consistently against the background of mean sea level rise for all investigated climate projections, while simulated system overload is higher for the RCP8.5 scenario compared to the RCP2.6 scenario. Comparable to the past, future compound events will cause more potential damage compared to single extreme events. The model results indicate an increasing frequency and intensity of inland drainage system overloads along the North Sea coast if timely adaptation measures are not taken.
基于模型评估气候变化对风暴潮和降水事件叠加造成的德国北海沿岸内陆洪水风险的影响
摘要除风暴潮外,强降雨导致的内陆洪水对沿海低地的威胁也日益严重。特别是,由于地区水务局的技术排水能力有限,这两类事件的同时发生给他们带来了巨大挑战。在这项研究中,我们分析了德国北海沿岸埃姆登附近 Knock 测量仪的历史数据和情景模拟。对观测到的内陆洪水事件的评估表明,主要是中等风暴潮系列与大规模强降水相结合,导致内陆排水系统超负荷,而单独的最高风暴潮或降水事件则可以很好地处理。积极的风险管理需要对未来进行气候预测。因此,建立了一个水文模型和一个水动力海洋模型,并通过相同的气候模拟来估算未来排水系统的过载情况。对两个气候模型控制期的模拟评估证实,模型能够再现复合事件的产生机制。暴潮和降水的叠加导致了最高的排水系统超负荷,而系统超负荷也是由单独的强降水事件而不是由没有强降水的暴潮造成的。基于两种气候模型和两种排放情景的情景预测表明,在所有调查的气候预测中,在平均海平面上升的背景下,降雨和风暴潮复合事件的强度将持续增加,而与 RCP2.6 情景相比,RCP8.5 情景下的模拟系统超载更高。与过去相比,未来的复合事件将比单一极端事件造成更大的潜在破坏。模型结果表明,如果不及时采取适应措施,北海沿岸内陆排水系统超载的频率和强度将不断增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信