Influence of Supplementation of Phytogenic Feed Additives on Egg Quality of Layer Quail

G. kour, Nazam Khan, R.K. Sharma, Vikas Mahajan, Z.F. Bhat, S.A. Khandii
{"title":"Influence of Supplementation of Phytogenic Feed Additives on Egg Quality of Layer Quail","authors":"G. kour, Nazam Khan, R.K. Sharma, Vikas Mahajan, Z.F. Bhat, S.A. Khandii","doi":"10.18805/ijar.b-5273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Phytogenic feed additives (PFA) have enormous potential to replace commercial productive performance enhancer in layer quail diet that can be owed to their active principles, easy availability, non-toxic and residue-free nature. The present study was aimed to select an ideal PFA by evaluating the supplemental effect of various phytoadditives on egg quality indices. Methods: Three hundred sixty quail layers (6 weeks old; same hatch) were randomly distributed into eight groups (n=45), having three replicas of 15 quail layers per group. Basal diet was similar in all groups, except PFA supplementation. Different dietary groups were: Negative control (NC; contains no additive), positive control (PC; herbal growth promoter), whereas T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 groups were supplemented with 1% dietary additive namely turmeric, garlic, fenugreek, cumin, aloe vera and oregano powder, respectively. Eggs were evaluated for external and internal egg quality indices at monthly intervals, but yolk cholesterol was determined at end of trial. Result: Our investigations revealed that average monthly egg number was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) in the PC and PFA supplemented groups during the first 3 months of laying. Mean egg weight of the trial was found significantly higher in PC, T1, T2, T4 and lowest in NC, with intermediate egg weights for rest groups. Shell thickness was found highest in PC, T1, T3 and lowest in NC, T5, T6 whereas rest groups have intermittent values. However, shape index showed higher values in PC, T1 and lower values in NC and T3. Average Haugh unit was found significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in T1 than rest of the groups, but yolk index showed no significant difference. The cholesterol content of quail egg yolk (mg/g yolk) was highest in NC group followed by PC and lowest in T2 and T3. Cost benefit ratio was found highest in T1, T3 and T5 and was lowest in T6 group. It may be inferred that turmeric supplementation is comparable to commercial herbal additive in terms of egg quality of layer quail.\n","PeriodicalId":507727,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Animal Research","volume":"48 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.b-5273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phytogenic feed additives (PFA) have enormous potential to replace commercial productive performance enhancer in layer quail diet that can be owed to their active principles, easy availability, non-toxic and residue-free nature. The present study was aimed to select an ideal PFA by evaluating the supplemental effect of various phytoadditives on egg quality indices. Methods: Three hundred sixty quail layers (6 weeks old; same hatch) were randomly distributed into eight groups (n=45), having three replicas of 15 quail layers per group. Basal diet was similar in all groups, except PFA supplementation. Different dietary groups were: Negative control (NC; contains no additive), positive control (PC; herbal growth promoter), whereas T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 groups were supplemented with 1% dietary additive namely turmeric, garlic, fenugreek, cumin, aloe vera and oregano powder, respectively. Eggs were evaluated for external and internal egg quality indices at monthly intervals, but yolk cholesterol was determined at end of trial. Result: Our investigations revealed that average monthly egg number was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) in the PC and PFA supplemented groups during the first 3 months of laying. Mean egg weight of the trial was found significantly higher in PC, T1, T2, T4 and lowest in NC, with intermediate egg weights for rest groups. Shell thickness was found highest in PC, T1, T3 and lowest in NC, T5, T6 whereas rest groups have intermittent values. However, shape index showed higher values in PC, T1 and lower values in NC and T3. Average Haugh unit was found significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in T1 than rest of the groups, but yolk index showed no significant difference. The cholesterol content of quail egg yolk (mg/g yolk) was highest in NC group followed by PC and lowest in T2 and T3. Cost benefit ratio was found highest in T1, T3 and T5 and was lowest in T6 group. It may be inferred that turmeric supplementation is comparable to commercial herbal additive in terms of egg quality of layer quail.
添加植物性饲料添加剂对蛋鸡蛋品质的影响
背景:植物性饲料添加剂(PFA)具有巨大的潜力,可替代蛋鹑日粮中的商业生产性能增强剂,这归功于其活性原理、易于获得、无毒和无残留的特性。本研究旨在通过评估各种植物添加剂对蛋品质量指标的补充作用来选择理想的 PFA。研究方法将 360 只蛋鸡(6 周龄;同一孵化期)随机分为 8 组(n=45),每组 15 只,共 3 个重复。除补充 PFA 外,各组基础日粮相似。不同日粮组为阴性对照组(NC;不含添加剂)、阳性对照组(PC;草本生长促进剂),而 T1、T2、T3、T4、T5 和 T6 组则分别添加 1% 的日粮添加剂,即姜黄、大蒜、葫芦巴、小茴香、芦荟和牛至粉。每月对鸡蛋的外部和内部质量指标进行评估,但在试验结束时测定蛋黄胆固醇。结果调查显示,在蛋鸡产蛋的前 3 个月,添加 PC 和 PFA 的组每月平均产蛋数明显增加(P 小于 0.05)。试验发现,PC、T1、T2 和 T4 组的平均蛋重明显较高,NC 组最低,其余各组蛋重居中。蛋壳厚度在 PC、T1、T3 中最高,在 NC、T5、T6 中最低,而其他组的蛋壳厚度值则时好时坏。然而,形状指数在 PC、T1 中显示出较高值,而在 NC 和 T3 中显示出较低值。平均哈氏单位在 T1 组明显高于其他组(P 小于 0.05),但蛋黄指数没有明显差异。鹌鹑蛋蛋黄中的胆固醇含量(毫克/克蛋黄),NC 组最高,PC 组次之,T2 和 T3 组最低。成本效益比在 T1、T3 和 T5 组最高,在 T6 组最低。由此可以推断,就蛋鸡的蛋品质而言,姜黄添加剂与商业草药添加剂不相上下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信