The effect of adaptive capacity on resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country analysis

Asmita Khadka
{"title":"The effect of adaptive capacity on resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country analysis","authors":"Asmita Khadka","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic’s profound impacts on global health, driven by preparedness gaps and systemic risks, underscore the need to enhance societies’ ability to manage both predictable risks and uncertainties inherent in disasters. While disaster research emphasises risk management for predictable threats and adaptive capacity for unexpected challenges, there is a lack of empirical examination of the impact of adaptive capacity on disaster resilience. This study addresses this gap by identifying three key adaptive capacities – quality of institutions, collaborative governance, and social capital – and examining their effects on COVID-19 resilience outcomes, measured by the ability to reduce excess mortality. Analysing secondary data from 129 nations using partial least squares structural equation modelling, the research finds significant positive effects of institutional quality and social capital on resilience outcomes. Conversely, collaborative governance shows a significant negative association, suggesting potentially intricate impacts beyond initial expectations. The findings highlight the need to enhance institutional quality and social capital to address preparedness gaps and unexpected challenges posed by biological hazards such as COVID-19. Future research should explore collaborative governance using a disaggregated approach that considers the roles of different stakeholders in various disaster phases.Contribution: This study advances disaster research by presenting practical methodologies for operationalising adaptive capacities and empirically examining their effects on disaster resilience. For practitioners and policymakers, it highlights the need to adopt a long-term perspective in building disaster resilience, focussing on improving institutional quality and social capital to manage the uncertainties and complexities inherent in disaster scenarios effectively. ","PeriodicalId":507873,"journal":{"name":"Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic’s profound impacts on global health, driven by preparedness gaps and systemic risks, underscore the need to enhance societies’ ability to manage both predictable risks and uncertainties inherent in disasters. While disaster research emphasises risk management for predictable threats and adaptive capacity for unexpected challenges, there is a lack of empirical examination of the impact of adaptive capacity on disaster resilience. This study addresses this gap by identifying three key adaptive capacities – quality of institutions, collaborative governance, and social capital – and examining their effects on COVID-19 resilience outcomes, measured by the ability to reduce excess mortality. Analysing secondary data from 129 nations using partial least squares structural equation modelling, the research finds significant positive effects of institutional quality and social capital on resilience outcomes. Conversely, collaborative governance shows a significant negative association, suggesting potentially intricate impacts beyond initial expectations. The findings highlight the need to enhance institutional quality and social capital to address preparedness gaps and unexpected challenges posed by biological hazards such as COVID-19. Future research should explore collaborative governance using a disaggregated approach that considers the roles of different stakeholders in various disaster phases.Contribution: This study advances disaster research by presenting practical methodologies for operationalising adaptive capacities and empirically examining their effects on disaster resilience. For practitioners and policymakers, it highlights the need to adopt a long-term perspective in building disaster resilience, focussing on improving institutional quality and social capital to manage the uncertainties and complexities inherent in disaster scenarios effectively. 
适应能力对抵御 COVID-19 大流行的影响:跨国分析
COVID-19 大流行对全球健康的深远影响是由备灾差距和系统性风险造成的,这突出表明有必要提高社会管理灾害中可预测风险和不确定性的能力。虽然灾害研究强调对可预测威胁的风险管理和对意外挑战的适应能力,但缺乏对适应能力对抗灾能力影响的实证研究。为了弥补这一不足,本研究确定了三种关键的适应能力--机构质量、合作治理和社会资本--并考察了它们对 COVID-19 抗灾能力结果的影响(以降低超额死亡率的能力为衡量标准)。研究使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型分析了 129 个国家的二手数据,发现机构质量和社会资本对复原力结果有显著的积极影响。相反,合作治理则显示出显著的负相关,这表明其潜在的复杂影响超出了最初的预期。研究结果突出表明,有必要提高机构质量和社会资本,以应对 COVID-19 等生物危害带来的准备差距和意外挑战。未来的研究应采用分类方法探索合作治理,考虑不同利益相关者在不同灾害阶段的作用:本研究提出了实用的适应能力操作方法,并对其对抗灾能力的影响进行了实证研究,从而推动了灾害研究。对于从业人员和政策制定者而言,该研究强调了在建设抗灾能力时采取长期视角的必要性,重点关注提高机构质量和社会资本,以有效管理灾害情景中固有的不确定性和复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信