Specters of Intersectionality

Cecilia Gebruers
{"title":"Specters of Intersectionality","authors":"Cecilia Gebruers","doi":"10.1177/17438721241261591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the optical and spectral facets of the notion of intersectionality in their materiality, in their forms as bodies and ghosts, doors, and thresholds. Scholarship on intersectionality has focused on critiquing the legal assumption that considers categories of discrimination to correspond to discrete aspects of identity, due to its negative effect of rendering certain experiences unrepresentable. As a consequence, the optical approach seeks to expose intersections and to reveal what remains hidden under these discrete frames. I would like to take the opportunity to write about Goodrich’s law, to delve into an additional register that is underdeveloped but, I argue, contained in the legal concept of intersectionality. Intersectionality has not addressed the spectral, the search for becoming, or the intent to conceptualize an encounter without anticipation, announcement, or previsions, even if that implies defying what a concept entails. Both are inextricably connected. Here I will distinguish the optical and the spectral aspects of the theory. The optical or operational side of intersectionality offers a door while the specter that phantasmatically sustains and holds intersectionality’s impulse in legal practice allows the manifestation of the illegible within the legible.","PeriodicalId":514759,"journal":{"name":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","volume":"100 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721241261591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the optical and spectral facets of the notion of intersectionality in their materiality, in their forms as bodies and ghosts, doors, and thresholds. Scholarship on intersectionality has focused on critiquing the legal assumption that considers categories of discrimination to correspond to discrete aspects of identity, due to its negative effect of rendering certain experiences unrepresentable. As a consequence, the optical approach seeks to expose intersections and to reveal what remains hidden under these discrete frames. I would like to take the opportunity to write about Goodrich’s law, to delve into an additional register that is underdeveloped but, I argue, contained in the legal concept of intersectionality. Intersectionality has not addressed the spectral, the search for becoming, or the intent to conceptualize an encounter without anticipation, announcement, or previsions, even if that implies defying what a concept entails. Both are inextricably connected. Here I will distinguish the optical and the spectral aspects of the theory. The optical or operational side of intersectionality offers a door while the specter that phantasmatically sustains and holds intersectionality’s impulse in legal practice allows the manifestation of the illegible within the legible.
交叉性的幽灵
文章从物质性的角度,以身体和幽灵、门和门槛的形式,展示了交叉性概念的光学和光谱面。关于交叉性的学术研究侧重于批判法律假设,即认为歧视的类别与身份的离散方面相对应,因为这种假设会产生负面影响,使某些经历无法得到体现。因此,光学方法试图揭示交叉性,并揭示这些离散框架下隐藏的东西。我想借此机会谈谈古德里奇法,深入探讨交叉性这一法律概念中所包含的另一个未得到充分发展的领域。交叉性并未涉及幽灵、对 "成为 "的追寻,或将遭遇概念化的意图,而无需预期、宣布或预设,即使这意味着对概念所蕴含的意义的蔑视。两者密不可分。在此,我将区分该理论的光学层面和光谱层面。交叉性的光学或操作层面提供了一扇门,而幽灵则在法律实践中幽灵般地维持和保持着交叉性的冲动,使可读性中的不可读性得以显现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信