Exploring the Dynamics of Death Attitude Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Papers in Dimension (2015-2024)

T. Karki, Laveena D’Mello, Dasarath Neupane, S. Shrestha, Dipak Mahat
{"title":"Exploring the Dynamics of Death Attitude Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Papers in Dimension (2015-2024)","authors":"T. Karki, Laveena D’Mello, Dasarath Neupane, S. Shrestha, Dipak Mahat","doi":"10.47175/rissj.v5i3.960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nDeath is not viewed as the absolute end, but rather as a gateway to a continued spiritual existence or rebirth. The main objective of this study is to find out the publication trend of death attitude-related articles from 2015 to 2024.  The study used the bibliometric analysis method to analyze the data published in Dimensions. Analysis of death attitude publications over the past decade reveals increasing interest, with a peak in 2021 but a decline in 2022 and 2023. Citation analysis shows a steady rise in citations until 2022, followed by a slight decline. The percentage of publications with citations has decreased over the years. Metrics like FCR and RCR indicate fluctuating citation impact. Interdisciplinary research is evident, with dominant categories including \"Human Society,\" \"Health Sciences,\" and \"Law and Legal Studies.\" Leading countries in death attitude research include the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Challenges such as declining citation uptake underscore the need for enhanced dissemination efforts. Death attitude research has seen increasing interest and impact, significant challenges in citation uptake and fluctuating impact highlight the need for strategic improvements in research dissemination and visibility. Addressing these issues is essential to maintain and enhance the field's scholarly influence.","PeriodicalId":259210,"journal":{"name":"Randwick International of Social Science Journal","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Randwick International of Social Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v5i3.960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Death is not viewed as the absolute end, but rather as a gateway to a continued spiritual existence or rebirth. The main objective of this study is to find out the publication trend of death attitude-related articles from 2015 to 2024.  The study used the bibliometric analysis method to analyze the data published in Dimensions. Analysis of death attitude publications over the past decade reveals increasing interest, with a peak in 2021 but a decline in 2022 and 2023. Citation analysis shows a steady rise in citations until 2022, followed by a slight decline. The percentage of publications with citations has decreased over the years. Metrics like FCR and RCR indicate fluctuating citation impact. Interdisciplinary research is evident, with dominant categories including "Human Society," "Health Sciences," and "Law and Legal Studies." Leading countries in death attitude research include the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Challenges such as declining citation uptake underscore the need for enhanced dissemination efforts. Death attitude research has seen increasing interest and impact, significant challenges in citation uptake and fluctuating impact highlight the need for strategic improvements in research dissemination and visibility. Addressing these issues is essential to maintain and enhance the field's scholarly influence.
探索死亡态度研究的动态:维度科学论文的文献计量分析(2015-2024 年)
ABSTRACT 死亡并不被视为绝对的终结,而是通往精神继续存在或重生的大门。本研究的主要目的是了解 2015 年至 2024 年死亡态度相关文章的发表趋势。 研究采用文献计量分析方法对《维度》上发表的数据进行分析。对过去十年死亡态度论文发表情况的分析表明,人们对死亡态度的关注度不断提高,2021年达到高峰,但2022年和2023年有所下降。引文分析显示,2022 年之前引文量稳步上升,随后略有下降。有引文的出版物比例逐年下降。FCR和RCR等指标表明引文影响力在波动。跨学科研究十分明显,主要类别包括 "人类社会"、"健康科学 "和 "法律与法学研究"。在死亡态度研究方面处于领先地位的国家包括美国、英国和澳大利亚。引用率下降等挑战凸显了加强传播工作的必要性。死亡态度研究的关注度和影响力与日俱增,但在引用率和影响力波动方面面临的重大挑战突出表明,需要从战略上改善研究的传播和可见度。解决这些问题对于保持和提高该领域的学术影响力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信