Dried Cannabis Use, Tobacco Smoking, and COVID-19 Infection: Findings from a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study

Nadia Milad, K. Belisario, J. MacKillop, Jeremy Hirota
{"title":"Dried Cannabis Use, Tobacco Smoking, and COVID-19 Infection: Findings from a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study","authors":"Nadia Milad, K. Belisario, J. MacKillop, Jeremy Hirota","doi":"10.26828/cannabis/2024/000248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The potential impact of cigarette and cannabis smoking on COVID-19 infection outcomes is not well understood. We investigated the association between combustible tobacco use and dried cannabis use with COVID-19 infection in a longitudinal cohort of community adults. Method: The sample comprised 1,343 participants, originally enrolled in 2018, who reported their cigarette and cannabis use in 11 assessments over 44 months, until 2022. COVID-19 infection history were self-reported after the onset of the pandemic. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. The potentially confounding factor of vaccination status was also considered by stratifying data by booster vaccination self-reporting. Results: Among 1,343 participants, 820 (61.1%) reported any COVID-19 infection. Dried cannabis use (46.3% of participants, n = 721) was associated with higher self-reporting of 2+ COVID-19 infections (13.3% vs. 7.3% in non-users, p = .0004), while tobacco use (18.5% of participants, n = 248) had no significant effect (13.3% vs. 10.0% in no use group, p = .116). When stratified into single or dual substance use groups, dried cannabis-only use was associated with increased reporting of 1 or 2+ COVID-19 infections compared to substance non-users, while tobacco-only use and dual use groups were not significantly different from non-users. To account for differences in vaccination rates between substance use groups, we found that, among individuals with a COVID-19 booster vaccine, dried cannabis use was still associated with increased reporting of 2+ COVID-19 infections (p = .008). Conclusions: Our study suggests that dried cannabis use is associated with a higher likelihood of reporting 2+ COVID-19 infections. Although the study was observational and relied on self-report infection status, our findings support the need for further investigation into the impact of cannabis use on COVID-19 infection, particularly studies employing controlled experimental designs.","PeriodicalId":502578,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis","volume":"21 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2024/000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The potential impact of cigarette and cannabis smoking on COVID-19 infection outcomes is not well understood. We investigated the association between combustible tobacco use and dried cannabis use with COVID-19 infection in a longitudinal cohort of community adults. Method: The sample comprised 1,343 participants, originally enrolled in 2018, who reported their cigarette and cannabis use in 11 assessments over 44 months, until 2022. COVID-19 infection history were self-reported after the onset of the pandemic. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. The potentially confounding factor of vaccination status was also considered by stratifying data by booster vaccination self-reporting. Results: Among 1,343 participants, 820 (61.1%) reported any COVID-19 infection. Dried cannabis use (46.3% of participants, n = 721) was associated with higher self-reporting of 2+ COVID-19 infections (13.3% vs. 7.3% in non-users, p = .0004), while tobacco use (18.5% of participants, n = 248) had no significant effect (13.3% vs. 10.0% in no use group, p = .116). When stratified into single or dual substance use groups, dried cannabis-only use was associated with increased reporting of 1 or 2+ COVID-19 infections compared to substance non-users, while tobacco-only use and dual use groups were not significantly different from non-users. To account for differences in vaccination rates between substance use groups, we found that, among individuals with a COVID-19 booster vaccine, dried cannabis use was still associated with increased reporting of 2+ COVID-19 infections (p = .008). Conclusions: Our study suggests that dried cannabis use is associated with a higher likelihood of reporting 2+ COVID-19 infections. Although the study was observational and relied on self-report infection status, our findings support the need for further investigation into the impact of cannabis use on COVID-19 infection, particularly studies employing controlled experimental designs.
干大麻使用、吸烟和 COVID-19 感染:一项纵向观察队列研究的结果
目的:吸烟和吸食大麻对 COVID-19 感染结果的潜在影响尚不十分清楚。我们在社区成人纵向队列中调查了可燃烟草使用和干大麻使用与 COVID-19 感染之间的关系。研究方法:样本包括 1343 名参与者,他们最初于 2018 年注册,在 44 个月内的 11 次评估中报告了他们的香烟和大麻使用情况,直至 2022 年。COVID-19感染史是在大流行开始后自行报告的。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。此外,还考虑了疫苗接种情况这一潜在的混杂因素,根据加强免疫接种的自我报告情况对数据进行了分层。结果显示在 1343 名参与者中,有 820 人(61.1%)报告感染过 COVID-19。吸食干大麻(占参与者的 46.3%,n = 721)与较高的 COVID-19 2+ 感染自我报告率相关(13.3% 对非吸食者的 7.3%,p = .0004),而吸食烟草(占参与者的 18.5%,n = 248)则无显著影响(13.3% 对不吸食组的 10.0%,p = .116)。如果按单一或双重使用药物组进行分层,与不使用药物组相比,只吸食干大麻与报告的 1 或 2+ COVID-19 感染率增加有关,而只使用烟草组和双重使用药物组与不使用药物组没有显著差异。考虑到不同药物使用群体之间疫苗接种率的差异,我们发现,在接种过 COVID-19 加强型疫苗的人群中,吸食干大麻仍与报告 COVID-19 感染 2+ 的人数增加有关(p = .008)。结论:我们的研究表明,吸食干大麻与报告 2+ COVID-19 感染的可能性增加有关。虽然这项研究是观察性的,并且依赖于自我报告感染状况,但我们的研究结果支持有必要进一步调查吸食大麻对 COVID-19 感染的影响,特别是采用对照实验设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信