Perspectives on project finance and renewable energy infrastructure research

Santiago Gómez-Valencia, J. D. Gonzalez-Ruiz, N. Marín‐Rodríguez
{"title":"Perspectives on project finance and renewable energy infrastructure research","authors":"Santiago Gómez-Valencia, J. D. Gonzalez-Ruiz, N. Marín‐Rodríguez","doi":"10.24294/jipd.v8i7.6041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the studies on project finance (PF) and renewable energy (RE) arena, employing a comprehensive scientometric analysis to illuminate the current research landscape, identify prominent scholars, and uncover emerging trends. Encompassing several analyses, we have charted the evolution of this domain from 1993 to March 2024 and showed the way for further research. We analyzed 80 studies selected from several databases by means scientometric tools. Despite decent citation rates, research in this relatively young field is surprisingly scarce. While geographically diverse, research leadership stems from the UK, USA, Australia, and Germany. Interestingly, a significant portion of the studies originates from broad energy and sustainability areas, highlighting a potential knowledge gap in finance and economics areas. Additionally, the prevalence of case studies points to a strong connection between theory and practice. The research also revealed prominent topics like the interplay between PF and RE, various renewable resources, infrastructure development, financial considerations, risk management, among others. While many themes exist, areas like technological advancements, diverse cost approaches, valuation methodologies, and policy considerations remain underexplored. Other results unveiled an unexpected finding: limited evidence of large-scale collaborations, with individual or small-group research efforts currently dominating the field. However, existing collaborative networks promise future advancements through the emergence of more formalized research groups, which can perform future research endeavors with a wide spectrum of unexplored topics.","PeriodicalId":505054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development","volume":"15 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.6041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the studies on project finance (PF) and renewable energy (RE) arena, employing a comprehensive scientometric analysis to illuminate the current research landscape, identify prominent scholars, and uncover emerging trends. Encompassing several analyses, we have charted the evolution of this domain from 1993 to March 2024 and showed the way for further research. We analyzed 80 studies selected from several databases by means scientometric tools. Despite decent citation rates, research in this relatively young field is surprisingly scarce. While geographically diverse, research leadership stems from the UK, USA, Australia, and Germany. Interestingly, a significant portion of the studies originates from broad energy and sustainability areas, highlighting a potential knowledge gap in finance and economics areas. Additionally, the prevalence of case studies points to a strong connection between theory and practice. The research also revealed prominent topics like the interplay between PF and RE, various renewable resources, infrastructure development, financial considerations, risk management, among others. While many themes exist, areas like technological advancements, diverse cost approaches, valuation methodologies, and policy considerations remain underexplored. Other results unveiled an unexpected finding: limited evidence of large-scale collaborations, with individual or small-group research efforts currently dominating the field. However, existing collaborative networks promise future advancements through the emergence of more formalized research groups, which can perform future research endeavors with a wide spectrum of unexplored topics.
关于项目融资和可再生能源基础设施研究的观点
本研究对项目融资(PF)和可再生能源(RE)领域的研究进行了分析,采用了全面的科学计量学分析方法,以阐明当前的研究状况,确定著名学者,并揭示新兴趋势。通过多项分析,我们描绘了该领域从 1993 年到 2024 年 3 月的演变过程,并为进一步研究指明了方向。我们利用科学计量学工具分析了从多个数据库中选取的 80 项研究。尽管引用率还不错,但这一相对年轻领域的研究却少得令人吃惊。从地域上看,英国、美国、澳大利亚和德国在研究方面处于领先地位。有趣的是,很大一部分研究都来自能源和可持续发展领域,凸显了金融和经济领域的潜在知识缺口。此外,案例研究的盛行也表明了理论与实践之间的紧密联系。研究还发现了一些突出的主题,如 PF 与可再生能源之间的相互作用、各种可再生资源、基础设施发展、财务考虑因素、风险管理等。虽然存在许多主题,但技术进步、不同的成本方法、估值方法和政策考虑等领域仍未得到充分探索。其他结果揭示了一个意想不到的发现:大规模合作的证据有限,个人或小团体的研究工作目前在该领域占主导地位。不过,现有的合作网络有望通过更正规化的研究小组的出现推动未来的进步,这些研究小组可以在未来开展广泛的未探索课题的研究工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书