Menstrual hygiene management among government school going adolescent girls in Tumakuru District, Karnataka in India: a comparative cross-sectional study

Kusuma Achalkar
{"title":" Menstrual hygiene management among government school going adolescent girls in Tumakuru District, Karnataka in India: a comparative cross-sectional study","authors":"Kusuma Achalkar","doi":"10.4038/jccpsl.v30i2.8661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Menstruation topic remains a taboo subject shrouded  with secrecy and shame among adolescent girls, which leads to lack of discourse and dialogue. Improving menstrual hygie ne management (MHM) practices during adolescent phases reduces reproductive morbidity in future. Objectives: To estimate and compare MHM among urban and rural  government high school adolescent girls Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted am ong adolescent girls studying in 8th to 10th standard in government high schools. One urban and two rural schools were invol ved in the study to meet the required sample size. In total, 464 girls were assessed using an interviewer-administered que stionnaire. Knowledge and hygienic practices, school absenteeism, restrictions during menses and socio- demographic fa ctors were compared between the two groups. Chi-squared test was used to calculate statistical significance at p<0.05. Results: The girls were in the age group of 12-17 years; mean age of  14.6 (SD=0.92) years with the mean age of attainment of menarche 12.6 (SD=0.94) years. Knowledge on MHM was good  in 157 (62.6%) rural girls compared to 116 (54.5%) urban girls. Pads were the main type of absorbents used by girls (r ural- 128, 51.0%; urban- 167, 78.4%), however, 43% (n=108) rural girls used both cloth and pads during menstruation c ompared to 16.4% (n=35) urban girls. Dysmenorrhea was the common complaint for being absent from school. This  difference between the two groups was significant (p<0.0006). More than 50% of girls in both groups complained that t hey were not permitted to enter ritual places; however, 13.14% (n=28) urban and 22.3% (n=56) rural girls had no restrictions  during menstruation. Conclusions & Recommendations: Girls have less knowledge on m enstruation; many are still using cloth as sanitary pads and do not practice the correct method of washing and drying. A mul ti-pronged approach to improve MHM is essential.","PeriodicalId":120205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jccpsl.v30i2.8661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Menstruation topic remains a taboo subject shrouded  with secrecy and shame among adolescent girls, which leads to lack of discourse and dialogue. Improving menstrual hygie ne management (MHM) practices during adolescent phases reduces reproductive morbidity in future. Objectives: To estimate and compare MHM among urban and rural  government high school adolescent girls Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted am ong adolescent girls studying in 8th to 10th standard in government high schools. One urban and two rural schools were invol ved in the study to meet the required sample size. In total, 464 girls were assessed using an interviewer-administered que stionnaire. Knowledge and hygienic practices, school absenteeism, restrictions during menses and socio- demographic fa ctors were compared between the two groups. Chi-squared test was used to calculate statistical significance at p<0.05. Results: The girls were in the age group of 12-17 years; mean age of  14.6 (SD=0.92) years with the mean age of attainment of menarche 12.6 (SD=0.94) years. Knowledge on MHM was good  in 157 (62.6%) rural girls compared to 116 (54.5%) urban girls. Pads were the main type of absorbents used by girls (r ural- 128, 51.0%; urban- 167, 78.4%), however, 43% (n=108) rural girls used both cloth and pads during menstruation c ompared to 16.4% (n=35) urban girls. Dysmenorrhea was the common complaint for being absent from school. This  difference between the two groups was significant (p<0.0006). More than 50% of girls in both groups complained that t hey were not permitted to enter ritual places; however, 13.14% (n=28) urban and 22.3% (n=56) rural girls had no restrictions  during menstruation. Conclusions & Recommendations: Girls have less knowledge on m enstruation; many are still using cloth as sanitary pads and do not practice the correct method of washing and drying. A mul ti-pronged approach to improve MHM is essential.
印度卡纳塔克邦图马库鲁县公立学校少女的经期卫生管理:一项横断面比较研究
导言:月经话题仍然是一个禁忌话题,在青春期少女中笼罩着秘密和羞耻,导致缺乏讨论和对话。在青春期改善月经卫生管理(MHM)做法可降低未来的生殖发病率。目标估计并比较城市和农村公立高中女生的经期卫生管理方法:对在公立高中就读八至十年级的少女进行横断面比较研究。为达到所需的样本量,研究涉及一所城市学校和两所农村学校。共对 464 名女生进行了问卷调查。对两组女生的知识和卫生习惯、旷课情况、经期限制和社会人口因素进行了比较。采用卡方检验来计算 P<0.05 时的统计显著性。结果这些女孩的年龄在 12-17 岁之间;平均年龄为 14.6 岁(标准差=0.92),平均初潮年龄为 12.6 岁(标准差=0.94)。157 名(62.6%)农村女孩对母婴保健知识了解较多,而 116 名(54.5%)城市女孩对母婴保健知识了解较少。护垫是女孩使用的主要吸收剂类型(农村 128 人,51.0%;城市 167 人,78.4%),然而,43%(n=108)的农村女孩在月经期间同时使用布和护垫,而城市女孩只有 16.4%(n=35)。痛经是缺课的常见原因。两组之间的差异显著(p<0.0006)。两组中都有 50%以上的女孩抱怨她们不能进入祭祀场所;然而,13.14%(人数=28)的城市女孩和 22.3%(人数=56)的农村女孩在月经期间没有任何限制。结论与建议女孩对月经的了解较少;许多女孩仍在使用布作为卫生护垫,并且没有采用正确的清洗和晾干方法。必须采取多管齐下的方法来改善 MHM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信