The role of hyetograph shape and designer subjectivity in the design of a urban drainage system

Spyros Pritsis, Vincent Pons, M. Rokstad, F. Clemens-Meyer, M. Kleidorfer, F. Tscheikner-Gratl
{"title":"The role of hyetograph shape and designer subjectivity in the design of a urban drainage system","authors":"Spyros Pritsis, Vincent Pons, M. Rokstad, F. Clemens-Meyer, M. Kleidorfer, F. Tscheikner-Gratl","doi":"10.2166/wst.2024.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Even though it has been established that a hyetograph's shape affects the results of hydrological simulations, common engineering practice does not always account for this fact. Instead, a single design storm is often considered sufficient for designing a urban drainage system. This study examines the impact that this design paradigm, combined with the uncertainty introduced by subjective choices made during the design process, has on the robustness of a designed system. To do so, we evaluated a set of individual designs created by engineering students using the same Chicago hyetograph as a design storm. We then created ensembles of hyetographs with the same precipitation volume and duration as the Chicago hyetograph and evaluated the designs' hydrological responses. The results showed that designs, which performed equally well for the initial design storm, triggered varying responses for the storms in the ensembles and, consequently, showed different levels of robustness, hinting at a need to adapt the current design approach.","PeriodicalId":505935,"journal":{"name":"Water Science & Technology","volume":"29 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though it has been established that a hyetograph's shape affects the results of hydrological simulations, common engineering practice does not always account for this fact. Instead, a single design storm is often considered sufficient for designing a urban drainage system. This study examines the impact that this design paradigm, combined with the uncertainty introduced by subjective choices made during the design process, has on the robustness of a designed system. To do so, we evaluated a set of individual designs created by engineering students using the same Chicago hyetograph as a design storm. We then created ensembles of hyetographs with the same precipitation volume and duration as the Chicago hyetograph and evaluated the designs' hydrological responses. The results showed that designs, which performed equally well for the initial design storm, triggered varying responses for the storms in the ensembles and, consequently, showed different levels of robustness, hinting at a need to adapt the current design approach.
水文图形状和设计者主观性在城市排水系统设计中的作用
尽管已经确定水文图的形状会影响水文模拟的结果,但通常的工程实践并不总是考虑这一事实。相反,在设计城市排水系统时,通常认为单一设计暴雨就足够了。本研究探讨了这种设计模式,以及设计过程中主观选择带来的不确定性对设计系统稳健性的影响。为此,我们使用相同的芝加哥水文图作为设计风暴,对工程专业学生设计的一组单个设计进行了评估。然后,我们创建了降水量和持续时间与芝加哥降水图相同的降水图集合,并对设计的水文响应进行了评估。结果表明,在初始设计暴雨中表现同样出色的设计,在集合暴雨中却引发了不同的反应,因此表现出不同程度的稳健性,这表明有必要调整当前的设计方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信