Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Belgium: awareness, use, and antimicrobial resistance concerns in a cross-sectional online survey

T. Vanbaelen, A. Rotsaert, I. De Baetselier, T. Platteau, B. Hensen, T. Reyniers, C. Kenyon
{"title":"Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Belgium: awareness, use, and antimicrobial resistance concerns in a cross-sectional online survey","authors":"T. Vanbaelen, A. Rotsaert, I. De Baetselier, T. Platteau, B. Hensen, T. Reyniers, C. Kenyon","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.25.24310975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives We aimed to assess the awareness, willingness to use, and actual use of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Belgium. Additionally, we aimed to identify factors associated with doxyPEP use and concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methods Cross-sectional online survey among MSM and TGW in Belgium in April 2024. Participants were recruited through sexual networking applications and social media of community-based organizations. Numerical variables were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical variables with chi-square or Fisher s exact tests. Factors associated with doxyPEP use were assessed using logistic regression. Willingness to use doxyPEP and concerns about side-effects/AMR were assessed before and after presenting a brief paragraph on the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR. Results A total of 875 individuals initiated the survey. Almost all identified as men (860/875, 98.3%) with a median age of 40 years (IQR 32-48). Among all respondents, 40.4% (n=352/875) had heard of doxyPEP and 9.4% (n=82/875) had used it, among whom the majority used it within the last six months (70/81, 86.4%). In multivariable logistic regression, doxyPEP use was associated with having had [≥]1 STI in the past 12 months and engagement in chemsex. About 80% of the participants initially reported being willing to use doxyPEP, and about 50% reported being concerned about side effects. After reading about the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR, willingness to use doxyPEP decreased to 60% and concerns of side-effects including AMR increased to around 70%. Conclusions Approximately one in ten MSM and TGW in Belgium reported using doxyPEP, with those at highest STI risk reporting higher usage. Importantly, concerns about AMR and side effect influenced willingness to use doxyPEP. If doxyPEP is introduced, informing patients about doxyPEP benefits and risks is crucial to enable informed decision-making.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.25.24310975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives We aimed to assess the awareness, willingness to use, and actual use of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Belgium. Additionally, we aimed to identify factors associated with doxyPEP use and concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methods Cross-sectional online survey among MSM and TGW in Belgium in April 2024. Participants were recruited through sexual networking applications and social media of community-based organizations. Numerical variables were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical variables with chi-square or Fisher s exact tests. Factors associated with doxyPEP use were assessed using logistic regression. Willingness to use doxyPEP and concerns about side-effects/AMR were assessed before and after presenting a brief paragraph on the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR. Results A total of 875 individuals initiated the survey. Almost all identified as men (860/875, 98.3%) with a median age of 40 years (IQR 32-48). Among all respondents, 40.4% (n=352/875) had heard of doxyPEP and 9.4% (n=82/875) had used it, among whom the majority used it within the last six months (70/81, 86.4%). In multivariable logistic regression, doxyPEP use was associated with having had [≥]1 STI in the past 12 months and engagement in chemsex. About 80% of the participants initially reported being willing to use doxyPEP, and about 50% reported being concerned about side effects. After reading about the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR, willingness to use doxyPEP decreased to 60% and concerns of side-effects including AMR increased to around 70%. Conclusions Approximately one in ten MSM and TGW in Belgium reported using doxyPEP, with those at highest STI risk reporting higher usage. Importantly, concerns about AMR and side effect influenced willingness to use doxyPEP. If doxyPEP is introduced, informing patients about doxyPEP benefits and risks is crucial to enable informed decision-making.
比利时男男性行为者和变性妇女接触强力霉素后的预防措施:横断面在线调查中的认识、使用情况和抗菌药耐药性问题
目的 我们旨在评估比利时男男性行为者(MSM)和变性女性(TGW)对强力霉素暴露后预防(doxyPEP)的认识、使用意愿和实际使用情况。此外,我们还旨在确定与使用强力霉素暴露后预防疗法(doxyPEP)相关的因素以及对抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的担忧。方法 2024 年 4 月对比利时的 MSM 和 TGW 进行横断面在线调查。参与者是通过社区组织的性网络应用程序和社交媒体招募的。数字变量的比较采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,分类变量的比较采用卡方检验或费雪精确检验。使用逻辑回归法评估了与使用强力杀菌剂相关的因素。在介绍 doxyPEP 对 AMR 的潜在影响之前和之后,对使用 doxyPEP 的意愿以及对副作用/AMR 的担忧进行了评估。结果 共有 875 人参与了调查。几乎所有受访者均为男性(860/875,98.3%),中位年龄为 40 岁(IQR 32-48)。在所有受访者中,40.4%(n=352/875)的人听说过强力杀虫剂,9.4%(n=82/875)的人使用过强力杀虫剂,其中大多数人在过去六个月内使用过强力杀虫剂(70/81,86.4%)。在多变量逻辑回归中,doxyPEP 的使用与过去 12 个月中曾[≥]1 次感染性传播疾病和参与化学性性行为有关。约 80% 的参与者最初表示愿意使用强力杀菌剂,约 50% 表示担心副作用。在了解了强力杀菌剂对急性腮腺炎病毒(AMR)的潜在影响后,愿意使用强力杀菌剂的比例下降到 60%,而担心副作用(包括急性腮腺炎病毒)的比例上升到 70%左右。结论 比利时约有十分之一的 MSM 和 TGW 使用强力杀菌剂,性传播感染风险最高的人群使用率更高。重要的是,对 AMR 和副作用的担忧影响了使用强力杀菌剂的意愿。如果引入强力杀菌剂,让患者了解强力杀菌剂的益处和风险对于做出知情决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信