Recurrence rates after functional surgery versus amputation for nail squamous cell carcinoma not involving the bone: A systematic review

Hoi-Shiwn Wong, Fang Li, Jia-Yi Jiang, Shu-dai Huang, Xiang Ji, Ping Zhu, Da-Guang Wang
{"title":"Recurrence rates after functional surgery versus amputation for nail squamous cell carcinoma not involving the bone: A systematic review","authors":"Hoi-Shiwn Wong, Fang Li, Jia-Yi Jiang, Shu-dai Huang, Xiang Ji, Ping Zhu, Da-Guang Wang","doi":"10.25259/ijdvl_912_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nNail unit squamous cell carcinoma (nSCC) is a malignant subungual tumour. Although it has a low risk of metastasis and mortality, the tumour has a significant local recurrence rate. There is insufficient data to determine whether functional surgery is less effective than amputation for nSCC that does not involve the bone.\n\n\n\nWe aimed to investigate existing data on the outcomes of functional surgery and amputation for nSCC without bone invasion.\n\n\n\nWe carried out an extensive search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus for appropriate English-language academic papers, starting with the creation of individual resources until February 23, 2023. The main outcome was local recurrence. Initially, 2191 studies related to nSCC were selected. Information from every research study was retrieved and subdivided, comprising the year of publication, period, number of patients, age, gender distribution, tumour stage, type of intervention, number of recurrences, and follow-up period.\n\n\n\nTen independent studies (319 lesions) were finally selected. Mohs micrographic surgery was the most reported surgical modality, followed by wide surgical excision and amputation. Local recurrence rates between Mohs micrographic surgery, wide surgical excision and amputation treatment were nearly identical. Other surgical methods included limited surgical excision, partial ablation, and limited excision until the clearing of margins, with recurrence rates up to 50%.\n\n\n\nGiven the functional impairment and psychological distress associated with phalanx amputation, functional surgery, including Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision , should be the preferred therapy for nSCC without bone involvement. Amputation should remain the preferred therapy for nSCC that involves the bone. Partial excision should be avoided. Further studies on whether Mohs micrographic surgery or wide surgical excision is a better option for nSCC not involving the bone are required.\n","PeriodicalId":513160,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijdvl_912_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nail unit squamous cell carcinoma (nSCC) is a malignant subungual tumour. Although it has a low risk of metastasis and mortality, the tumour has a significant local recurrence rate. There is insufficient data to determine whether functional surgery is less effective than amputation for nSCC that does not involve the bone. We aimed to investigate existing data on the outcomes of functional surgery and amputation for nSCC without bone invasion. We carried out an extensive search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus for appropriate English-language academic papers, starting with the creation of individual resources until February 23, 2023. The main outcome was local recurrence. Initially, 2191 studies related to nSCC were selected. Information from every research study was retrieved and subdivided, comprising the year of publication, period, number of patients, age, gender distribution, tumour stage, type of intervention, number of recurrences, and follow-up period. Ten independent studies (319 lesions) were finally selected. Mohs micrographic surgery was the most reported surgical modality, followed by wide surgical excision and amputation. Local recurrence rates between Mohs micrographic surgery, wide surgical excision and amputation treatment were nearly identical. Other surgical methods included limited surgical excision, partial ablation, and limited excision until the clearing of margins, with recurrence rates up to 50%. Given the functional impairment and psychological distress associated with phalanx amputation, functional surgery, including Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision , should be the preferred therapy for nSCC without bone involvement. Amputation should remain the preferred therapy for nSCC that involves the bone. Partial excision should be avoided. Further studies on whether Mohs micrographic surgery or wide surgical excision is a better option for nSCC not involving the bone are required.
非累及骨骼的指甲鳞状细胞癌功能性手术与截肢术后的复发率:系统性综述
甲单位鳞状细胞癌(nSCC)是一种甲下恶性肿瘤。虽然其转移和死亡风险较低,但肿瘤的局部复发率很高。我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和Scopus上广泛搜索了相关的英文学术论文,从创建单个资源开始,直至2023年2月23日。主要结果为局部复发。初步筛选出 2191 项与 nSCC 相关的研究。对每项研究的信息进行检索和细分,包括发表年份、时期、患者人数、年龄、性别分布、肿瘤分期、干预类型、复发次数和随访时间。莫氏显微外科手术是报道最多的手术方式,其次是大范围手术切除和截肢。莫氏显微手术、广泛手术切除和截肢治疗的局部复发率几乎相同。其他手术方法包括局限性手术切除、部分消融和局限性切除,直到边缘清晰为止,复发率高达 50%。考虑到指骨截肢带来的功能障碍和心理压力,功能性手术,包括莫氏显微外科手术和广泛手术切除,应成为无骨受累 nSCC 的首选疗法。截肢仍应是治疗累及骨骼的 nSCC 的首选疗法。应避免部分切除。对于未累及骨骼的 nSCC,Mohs 显微手术还是广泛手术切除是更好的选择,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信