Decolonization of Post-Soviet Higher Education: Critical Inquiry Through a Reflexive Scholarly Dialogue

A. Oleksiyenko, Giorgi Tavadze
{"title":"Decolonization of Post-Soviet Higher Education: Critical Inquiry Through a Reflexive Scholarly Dialogue","authors":"A. Oleksiyenko, Giorgi Tavadze","doi":"10.1177/15327086241266217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study probes a format of reflexive scholarly dialogue (RSD) to enhance critical inquiry for exploration and validation of dilemmas of postcolonialism in the post-soviet environments where coloniality is debatable and politicized. In this article, the RSD is conducted by two professors, located in different countries and cultures (Ukraine and Georgia) but sharing similar postcolonial experiences. Anatoly Oleksiyenko and Giorgi Tavadze reflect on what it means to decolonize themselves and their scholarship from the imperial discourse propagated by the Kremlin. They try to understand what de-Sovietization contributes to thinking and communication inter-ethnically and internationally. Re-examining their own experiences, Oleksiyenko and Tavadze delve into several issues that are essential for advancing critical thinking and discourse in this area of research: that is, the problems of coping with Russian propaganda and anti-westernization; critical inquiry into the purposes of de-Sovietization; and the future of decolonization and transformations of learning and inquiry in the post-soviet spaces of higher education. While developing RSD as a cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary instrument, the authors seek opportunities to problematize the prevalent concepts and approaches in postcolonial and decolonial studies in global higher education.","PeriodicalId":354189,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies","volume":"78 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241266217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study probes a format of reflexive scholarly dialogue (RSD) to enhance critical inquiry for exploration and validation of dilemmas of postcolonialism in the post-soviet environments where coloniality is debatable and politicized. In this article, the RSD is conducted by two professors, located in different countries and cultures (Ukraine and Georgia) but sharing similar postcolonial experiences. Anatoly Oleksiyenko and Giorgi Tavadze reflect on what it means to decolonize themselves and their scholarship from the imperial discourse propagated by the Kremlin. They try to understand what de-Sovietization contributes to thinking and communication inter-ethnically and internationally. Re-examining their own experiences, Oleksiyenko and Tavadze delve into several issues that are essential for advancing critical thinking and discourse in this area of research: that is, the problems of coping with Russian propaganda and anti-westernization; critical inquiry into the purposes of de-Sovietization; and the future of decolonization and transformations of learning and inquiry in the post-soviet spaces of higher education. While developing RSD as a cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary instrument, the authors seek opportunities to problematize the prevalent concepts and approaches in postcolonial and decolonial studies in global higher education.
后苏联高等教育的非殖民化:通过反思性学术对话进行批判性探索
本研究探索了一种反思性学术对话(RSD)的形式,以加强批判性探究,探索和验证后殖民主义在后苏联环境中的困境,因为在后苏联环境中,殖民性是值得商榷的,也是政治化的。在本文中,RSD 由两位教授进行,他们身处不同的国家和文化(乌克兰和格鲁吉亚),却有着相似的后殖民主义经历。阿纳托利-奥列克西延科(Anatoly Oleksiyenko)和乔治-塔瓦泽(Giorgi Tavadze)思考了从克里姆林宫宣传的帝国话语中将自己和学术非殖民化的意义。他们试图理解去苏联化对民族间和国际间的思维和交流有何帮助。奥列克西延科和塔瓦泽重新审视了自己的经历,深入探讨了对推进这一研究领域的批判性思维和话语至关重要的几个问题:即应对俄罗斯宣传和反西方化的问题;对去苏维埃化目的的批判性探究;以及后苏维埃高等教育空间中非殖民化和学习与探究变革的未来。在将 RSD 发展为跨文化和跨学科工具的同时,作者寻求机会对全球高等教育中后殖民和非殖民化研究的普遍概念和方法提出质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信