State and Fiqh: Examining the Legal Status of Divorce in Verstek Decision Number 2939/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Mdn

Maswandi Maswandi, Wenggedes Frensh, Fitri Yanni Dewi Siregar, Sri Hidayani
{"title":"State and Fiqh: Examining the Legal Status of Divorce in Verstek Decision Number 2939/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Mdn","authors":"Maswandi Maswandi, Wenggedes Frensh, Fitri Yanni Dewi Siregar, Sri Hidayani","doi":"10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is grounded in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, wherein the presiding magistrate rendered a verdict of Verstek in his consideration of the case. In such cases, the decision is rendered by the court in the absence of either the defendant or their legal representative. The validity of a verstek verdict in the context of the legitimacy of a marriage may be contingent upon the applicable legislation within the jurisdiction in question; thus, this investigation will consider both positive law and Islamic law. The objective of this article is to undertake a critical analysis of the decision rendered in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, which pertains to the use of a verstek decision to terminate a marriage due to childlessness, followed by disputes and quarrels. This research is a normative legal study with a case-based approach. The principal data source is derived from court decisions in the field of marriage law. The analysis reveals that, in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, a verdict of divorce by verstek is considered valid if the stipulated procedures have been followed correctly and the party who is required to be present or provide a defence does not do so without a valid reason. Islamic law also establishes principles of justice and protection of individual rights, including in the marriage process. Accordingly, the legitimacy of a marriage concluded through a verstek verdict may be contingent upon the interpretation of Islamic schools of thought and the legal principles that are embraced. Likewise, in the context of marriage law in Indonesia, a verstek decision in a verstek divorce case can be recognized as valid if it has fulfilled the requirements stipulated in the law. Thus, to determine whether a verstek decision in a marriage is valid or not, it is necessary to consider the applicable legal context, both in terms of civil law and in terms of Islamic law (fiqh) or the applicable marriage law.","PeriodicalId":504558,"journal":{"name":"Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is grounded in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, wherein the presiding magistrate rendered a verdict of Verstek in his consideration of the case. In such cases, the decision is rendered by the court in the absence of either the defendant or their legal representative. The validity of a verstek verdict in the context of the legitimacy of a marriage may be contingent upon the applicable legislation within the jurisdiction in question; thus, this investigation will consider both positive law and Islamic law. The objective of this article is to undertake a critical analysis of the decision rendered in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, which pertains to the use of a verstek decision to terminate a marriage due to childlessness, followed by disputes and quarrels. This research is a normative legal study with a case-based approach. The principal data source is derived from court decisions in the field of marriage law. The analysis reveals that, in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, a verdict of divorce by verstek is considered valid if the stipulated procedures have been followed correctly and the party who is required to be present or provide a defence does not do so without a valid reason. Islamic law also establishes principles of justice and protection of individual rights, including in the marriage process. Accordingly, the legitimacy of a marriage concluded through a verstek verdict may be contingent upon the interpretation of Islamic schools of thought and the legal principles that are embraced. Likewise, in the context of marriage law in Indonesia, a verstek decision in a verstek divorce case can be recognized as valid if it has fulfilled the requirements stipulated in the law. Thus, to determine whether a verstek decision in a marriage is valid or not, it is necessary to consider the applicable legal context, both in terms of civil law and in terms of Islamic law (fiqh) or the applicable marriage law.
国家与教法:审查第 2939/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Mdn 号 Verstek 裁决中离婚的法律地位
本研究以第 2939/Pdt.G/2023 号裁决为基础,在该裁决中,主审法官在审理案件时做出了 Verstek 判决。在此类案件中,法院是在被告或其法律代表缺席的情况下做出判决的。在婚姻合法性问题上,"Verstek 判决 "的有效性可能取决于相关司法管辖区的适用法律;因此,本调查将同时考虑实在法和伊斯兰法。本文的目的是对第 2939/Pdt.G/2023 号判决中做出的裁决进行批判性分析,该裁决涉及因无子嗣、纠纷和争吵而使用 "verstek "裁决终止婚姻的问题。本研究是一项以案例为基础的规范性法律研究。主要数据来源于婚姻法领域的法院判决。分析结果表明,在第 2939/Pdt.G/2023 号判决中,如果正确遵循了规定的程序,且被要求出庭或提供辩护的一方在没有正当理由的情况下没有出庭,则判决离婚有效。伊斯兰法还规定了公正和保护个人权利的原则,包括在婚姻过程中。因此,通过 verstek 判决缔结的婚姻的合法性可能取决于对伊斯兰思想流派和所接受的法律原则的解释。同样,就印度尼西亚的婚姻法而言,如果 "verstek "离婚案中的 "verstek "判决符合法律规定的要求,则该判决可被认定为有效。因此,要确定婚姻中的verstek裁决是否有效,就必须考虑适用的法律背景,既要考虑民法,也要考虑伊斯兰法(fiqh)或适用的婚姻法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信