Hepatitis B Core Related Antigen - Does it meet our expectations? Evidence from Cohorts in the United Kingdom and South Africa

Louise O. Downs, Marion Delphin, Marije van Schalwyk, S. Hugo, Shiraaz Gabriel, Sheila Lumley, E. Waddilove, Tingyan Wang, Catherine De Lara, Arran Babbs, Sue Wareing, Polyxeni Fengou, Monique I Andersson, R. Glashoff, Jacqueline Martin, M. A. Ansari, Kosh Agarwal, G. Dusheiko, J. Taljaard, W. Preiser, Eleanor Barnes, Gavin Kelly, I. Carey, Tongai Maponga, Philippa C Matthews
{"title":"Hepatitis B Core Related Antigen - Does it meet our expectations? Evidence from Cohorts in the United Kingdom and South Africa","authors":"Louise O. Downs, Marion Delphin, Marije van Schalwyk, S. Hugo, Shiraaz Gabriel, Sheila Lumley, E. Waddilove, Tingyan Wang, Catherine De Lara, Arran Babbs, Sue Wareing, Polyxeni Fengou, Monique I Andersson, R. Glashoff, Jacqueline Martin, M. A. Ansari, Kosh Agarwal, G. Dusheiko, J. Taljaard, W. Preiser, Eleanor Barnes, Gavin Kelly, I. Carey, Tongai Maponga, Philippa C Matthews","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.29.24311156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a pressing global public health threat, responsible for increasing mortality with a disproportionate impact on populations in the WHO African region. There is a need for evaluation of new biomarkers that may be able to provide insights into risk stratification and disease pathogenesis. We therefore set out to evaluate Hepatitis B core related antigen (HBcrAg), in cohorts in the United Kingdom (UK) and South Africa (SA). Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional retrospective observational study, using serum samples obtained from adults living with chronic HBV infection enrolled at Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) NHS Foundation Trust in the UK (n=142), and from a clinical cohort in Cape Town and Bloemfontein, SA (n=211). We recorded routine clinical and laboratory parameters gathered at each site, and undertook quantification of HBcrAg and host immune biomarkers, IL-21, IP-10 and PD-1. We report on HBcrAg distribution, relationship with other clinical and immunological biomarkers, and performance as a risk stratification tool in each setting. Results: Sex and age were comparable between SA and UK cohorts (p>0.05). There were significant differences between cohorts in ethnicity (p <0.001), HIV coinfection (2.3% in UK vs 56% in SA, p<0.001), HBeAg-positivity (12% in the UK vs 29% in SA, p<0.001), and proportion with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/ml (6% in the UK vs. 22% in SA, p<0.001). Host immune markers were all significantly higher in the SA vs UK cohorts (p<0.001 for all); (i) HBcrAg was positively associated with HBV DNA in both cohorts (p<0.0001), and in the UK this relationship was mediated by HBeAg-positivity. (ii) HBcrAg was also positively associated with overall liver inflammation assessed by ALT (p<0.001 in UK, p<0.01 in SA), however there was no specific significant correlation with more precise host immune markers, IP-10, IL-21 or PD-1 (p>0.05 in all cases). (iii) In univariable and multivariable analysis, there was no association between HBcrAg and liver fibrosis using elastography, APRI or FIB-4 scores in both cohorts. Discussion: In spite of similar HBcrAg levels in both the UK and SA cohorts, prediction of HBV VL seems to differ depending on settings, suggesting a more tailored and personalised approach to HBcrAg testing is required. In our cohorts, HBcrAg did not correlate with any liver disease outcomes.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.24311156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a pressing global public health threat, responsible for increasing mortality with a disproportionate impact on populations in the WHO African region. There is a need for evaluation of new biomarkers that may be able to provide insights into risk stratification and disease pathogenesis. We therefore set out to evaluate Hepatitis B core related antigen (HBcrAg), in cohorts in the United Kingdom (UK) and South Africa (SA). Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional retrospective observational study, using serum samples obtained from adults living with chronic HBV infection enrolled at Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) NHS Foundation Trust in the UK (n=142), and from a clinical cohort in Cape Town and Bloemfontein, SA (n=211). We recorded routine clinical and laboratory parameters gathered at each site, and undertook quantification of HBcrAg and host immune biomarkers, IL-21, IP-10 and PD-1. We report on HBcrAg distribution, relationship with other clinical and immunological biomarkers, and performance as a risk stratification tool in each setting. Results: Sex and age were comparable between SA and UK cohorts (p>0.05). There were significant differences between cohorts in ethnicity (p <0.001), HIV coinfection (2.3% in UK vs 56% in SA, p<0.001), HBeAg-positivity (12% in the UK vs 29% in SA, p<0.001), and proportion with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/ml (6% in the UK vs. 22% in SA, p<0.001). Host immune markers were all significantly higher in the SA vs UK cohorts (p<0.001 for all); (i) HBcrAg was positively associated with HBV DNA in both cohorts (p<0.0001), and in the UK this relationship was mediated by HBeAg-positivity. (ii) HBcrAg was also positively associated with overall liver inflammation assessed by ALT (p<0.001 in UK, p<0.01 in SA), however there was no specific significant correlation with more precise host immune markers, IP-10, IL-21 or PD-1 (p>0.05 in all cases). (iii) In univariable and multivariable analysis, there was no association between HBcrAg and liver fibrosis using elastography, APRI or FIB-4 scores in both cohorts. Discussion: In spite of similar HBcrAg levels in both the UK and SA cohorts, prediction of HBV VL seems to differ depending on settings, suggesting a more tailored and personalised approach to HBcrAg testing is required. In our cohorts, HBcrAg did not correlate with any liver disease outcomes.
乙型肝炎核心相关抗原 - 是否符合我们的期望?来自英国和南非队列的证据
导言:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染是一个紧迫的全球公共卫生威胁,它导致死亡率上升,对世卫组织非洲地区的人口影响尤为严重。我们需要对新的生物标志物进行评估,以深入了解风险分层和疾病发病机制。因此,我们开始在英国和南非的队列中评估乙型肝炎核心相关抗原(HBcrAg)。方法:我们进行了一项横断面回顾性观察研究,使用的血清样本来自英国牛津大学医院(OUH)NHS 基金会信托基金注册的慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染成人(142 人),以及南非开普敦和布隆方丹的临床队列(211 人)。我们记录了在每个地点收集到的常规临床和实验室参数,并对 HBcrAg 和宿主免疫生物标志物 IL-21、IP-10 和 PD-1 进行了量化。我们报告了 HBcrAg 的分布情况、与其他临床和免疫生物标志物的关系以及在每种情况下作为风险分层工具的性能。结果南澳大利亚队列和英国队列的性别和年龄相当(P>0.05)。在种族方面,南澳大利亚队列与英国队列之间存在明显差异(p 200,000 IU/ml,英国为 6%,南澳大利亚为 22%,所有病例均为 p0.05)。(iii) 在单变量和多变量分析中,两个组群的 HBcrAg 与肝纤维化(使用弹性成像、APRI 或 FIB-4 评分)之间没有关联。讨论尽管英国和南澳队列中的 HBcrAg 水平相似,但对 HBV VL 的预测似乎因环境而异,这表明需要对 HBcrAg 检测采取更有针对性和个性化的方法。在我们的队列中,HBcrAg 与任何肝病结果都不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信