Algorithm for assessing the level of T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2 and the results of its application in unvaccinated and vaccinated people who have been infected with COVID-19

M. Blyakher, I. Fedorova, S. I. Koteleva, I. Kapustin, E. Tulskaya, Z. K. Ramazanova, E. E. Odintsov, S. V. Sandalova, L. Novikova, S. Bochkareva
{"title":"Algorithm for assessing the level of T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2 and the results of its application in unvaccinated and vaccinated people who have been infected with COVID-19","authors":"M. Blyakher, I. Fedorova, S. I. Koteleva, I. Kapustin, E. Tulskaya, Z. K. Ramazanova, E. E. Odintsov, S. V. Sandalova, L. Novikova, S. Bochkareva","doi":"10.15789/2220-7619-afa-16736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antigen (AG)-specific T cell activity was compared in two groups of patients: those who underwent COVID-19 in 2021 during the circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 delta virus strain (43 individuals); and those who underwent COVID-19 in 2022 (Omicron strain, 23 individuals). The diagnosis was confirmed by PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs. The 23 individuals following COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 (omicron) were part of a cohort of 41 volunteers who were examined multiple times during 2021–2023: during vaccination, after vaccination, before revaccination, and subsequently after illness (6–8 times in total). Due to this, it was possible to compare the indices of specific humoral and cellular immunity in the same patients 1–2 months before and after breakthrough infection. Detection of AG-specific T cells and assessment of their activity by AG-stimulated IFNγ production was carried out by our own previously developed method (Patent RU № 2780369 C1). For stimulation of memory T effectors in vitro, the same antigens were used to determine the concentration of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by ELISA method. A total of about 300 blood samples from healthy subjects and patients after COVID-19 were analyzed. Each sample was tested against 3 SARS-CoV-2 antigens and in 2 stimulation modes. A qualitative assessment algorithm for AG-specific T cell activity has been proposed that can be used to monitor the state of cellular immunity in a population in which SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to circulate and to create insights into what level of T cell activation is sufficient to prevent or reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Unvaccinated COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2, Delta) survivors lacked AG-specific T cells to RBD SARS-CoV-2, but T cell specificity to full-length S glycoprotein at the same level, qualitatively assessed as low in 52% of the group, persisted for up to six months. In previously unvaccinated COVID-19 vaccinees, this duration of persistence of AG-specific T cells in circulating blood was achieved only after revaccination. Hybrid immunity, which we traced as a result of vaccination after COVID-19 (Delta strain) or as a breakthrough infection (SARS-CoV-2, Omicron), is characterized by the highest indices of memory T cell activity (43–46% of the group — normal activity of AG-specific cells, 30–43% — high activity) to all used antigens and the longest duration of preservation of indices at this level. Further investigation of the level of antiviral immunity after COVID-19 may be important for predicting the outcome of new waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection.","PeriodicalId":21412,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","volume":"3 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-afa-16736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antigen (AG)-specific T cell activity was compared in two groups of patients: those who underwent COVID-19 in 2021 during the circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 delta virus strain (43 individuals); and those who underwent COVID-19 in 2022 (Omicron strain, 23 individuals). The diagnosis was confirmed by PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs. The 23 individuals following COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 (omicron) were part of a cohort of 41 volunteers who were examined multiple times during 2021–2023: during vaccination, after vaccination, before revaccination, and subsequently after illness (6–8 times in total). Due to this, it was possible to compare the indices of specific humoral and cellular immunity in the same patients 1–2 months before and after breakthrough infection. Detection of AG-specific T cells and assessment of their activity by AG-stimulated IFNγ production was carried out by our own previously developed method (Patent RU № 2780369 C1). For stimulation of memory T effectors in vitro, the same antigens were used to determine the concentration of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by ELISA method. A total of about 300 blood samples from healthy subjects and patients after COVID-19 were analyzed. Each sample was tested against 3 SARS-CoV-2 antigens and in 2 stimulation modes. A qualitative assessment algorithm for AG-specific T cell activity has been proposed that can be used to monitor the state of cellular immunity in a population in which SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to circulate and to create insights into what level of T cell activation is sufficient to prevent or reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Unvaccinated COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2, Delta) survivors lacked AG-specific T cells to RBD SARS-CoV-2, but T cell specificity to full-length S glycoprotein at the same level, qualitatively assessed as low in 52% of the group, persisted for up to six months. In previously unvaccinated COVID-19 vaccinees, this duration of persistence of AG-specific T cells in circulating blood was achieved only after revaccination. Hybrid immunity, which we traced as a result of vaccination after COVID-19 (Delta strain) or as a breakthrough infection (SARS-CoV-2, Omicron), is characterized by the highest indices of memory T cell activity (43–46% of the group — normal activity of AG-specific cells, 30–43% — high activity) to all used antigens and the longest duration of preservation of indices at this level. Further investigation of the level of antiviral immunity after COVID-19 may be important for predicting the outcome of new waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
评估针对 SARS-CoV-2 的 T 细胞免疫反应水平的算法及其在感染 COVID-19 的未接种者和已接种者中的应用结果
比较了两组患者的抗原(AG)特异性 T 细胞活性:在 2021 年 SARS-CoV-2 delta 病毒株流行期间接受 COVID-19 的患者(43 人)和在 2022 年接受 COVID-19 的患者(Omicron 病毒株,23 人)。诊断是通过鼻咽和口咽拭子的 PCR 分析确认的。由 SARS-CoV-2(奥米克隆株)引起的 COVID-19 的 23 名患者是由 41 名志愿者组成的队列的一部分,他们在 2021-2023 年期间接受了多次检查:在接种疫苗期间、接种疫苗后、再次接种疫苗前以及发病后(共 6-8 次)。因此,可以比较同一患者在突破性感染前后1-2个月的特异性体液免疫和细胞免疫指标。AG 特异性 T 细胞的检测和通过 AG 刺激 IFNγ 的产生来评估其活性的方法是我们之前开发的方法(专利号:RU № 2780369 C1)。在体外刺激记忆 T 效应子时,使用了相同的抗原,通过 ELISA 方法测定抗 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体浓度。共分析了约 300 份健康受试者和 COVID-19 患者的血液样本。每个样本都针对 3 种 SARS-CoV-2 抗原和 2 种刺激模式进行了测试。我们提出了一种 AG 特异性 T 细胞活性的定性评估算法,该算法可用于监测 SARS-CoV-2 病毒继续在人群中传播时的细胞免疫状态,并深入了解何种程度的 T 细胞活化足以预防或减轻 SARS-CoV-2 感染的严重程度。未接种 COVID-19(SARS-CoV-2,Delta)疫苗的幸存者缺乏对 RBD SARS-CoV-2 的 AG 特异性 T 细胞,但对全长 S 糖蛋白具有相同水平的 T 细胞特异性(定性评估为 52% 的幸存者特异性较低)却持续了长达 6 个月。在以前未接种过 COVID-19 疫苗的受试者中,循环血液中 AG 特异性 T 细胞只有在重新接种后才能达到这种持续时间。我们追踪到的混合免疫是在接种 COVID-19(Delta 株)疫苗后或作为突破性感染(SARS-CoV-2,Omicron)的结果,其特点是对所有使用的抗原具有最高的记忆 T 细胞活性指数(43-46% 的群体 - AG 特异性细胞活性正常,30-43% - 高活性),并且在这一水平上保持指数的时间最长。进一步研究 COVID-19 后的抗病毒免疫水平可能对预测新一轮 SARS-CoV-2 感染的结果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信