Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Post operative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Carolena Rojas Marcos, Nicholas Schiller, Sebastian Braun, Daniel Knauer, Jacques Yadeau, A. Nocon, Bridget Jivanelli, D. Flevas, Thomas Sculco
{"title":"Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Post operative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review","authors":"Carolena Rojas Marcos, Nicholas Schiller, Sebastian Braun, Daniel Knauer, Jacques Yadeau, A. Nocon, Bridget Jivanelli, D. Flevas, Thomas Sculco","doi":"10.1177/15563316241260717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical remedy for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. Although TKA is generally effective, a significant number of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain. Psychosocial interventions have increasingly become an area of interest in pain management following surgical procedures. Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative psychosocial interventions on reducing the likelihood of developing chronic pain after TKA. Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. A comprehensive search strategy was employed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients undergoing; (2) pain outcome assessed ≥1 month post-operatively; (3) prospective and longitudinal study design (eg, randomized controlled trial, experimental non-randomized trial, cohort, case-control studies with measurement of exposure prior to outcome); (4) English language; and (5) psychosocial intervention (cognitive-behavioral, biopsychosocial, dialectical behavioral, psychoeducation, mindfulness, meditation, psychotherapy, relaxation, mind-body therapies, hypnosis). Exclusion criteria were non-primary literature (eg, review articles), non–peer-reviewed studies, and conference proceedings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane’s tool for Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2), the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). Results: Of 4297 studies reviewed with title and abstract, 4160 were excluded. Of the remaining 137 studies that underwent full-text review, 122 were excluded using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 15 studies were included. Our review indicates a variable but positive impact of psychosocial interventions, such as pre-operative education, relaxation techniques, and cognitive-behavioral therapy, on post-TKA pain. Of the 15 included studies, 9 studies found that psychosocial interventions reduced post-TKA pain. Our review also suggests that cognitive-behavioral therapy may aid in reducing kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, and knee pain intensity. For the 12 randomized studies, the risk of bias was deemed “high” concerns for 3 studies, “some” concerns for 5 studies, and “low” concerns for 4 studies. For the 3 non-randomized studies, the risk of bias was deemed “moderate” due to confounding bias. Conclusions: This systematic review of level-I and level-II studies found that the integration of psychosocial interventions into care protocols for TKA offers benefits including improved patient satisfaction and quality of life and reduced health care costs. Limitations include heterogeneity in intervention types and outcomes measured and the varying levels of risk of bias across studies, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. The findings support a broader adoption of holistic, patient-centered approaches in pain management after TKA, emphasizing the importance of psychological well-being for optimal patient outcomes. However, the evidence is limited and constitutes a strong impetus for the further study of these interventions.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241260717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical remedy for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. Although TKA is generally effective, a significant number of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain. Psychosocial interventions have increasingly become an area of interest in pain management following surgical procedures. Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative psychosocial interventions on reducing the likelihood of developing chronic pain after TKA. Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. A comprehensive search strategy was employed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients undergoing; (2) pain outcome assessed ≥1 month post-operatively; (3) prospective and longitudinal study design (eg, randomized controlled trial, experimental non-randomized trial, cohort, case-control studies with measurement of exposure prior to outcome); (4) English language; and (5) psychosocial intervention (cognitive-behavioral, biopsychosocial, dialectical behavioral, psychoeducation, mindfulness, meditation, psychotherapy, relaxation, mind-body therapies, hypnosis). Exclusion criteria were non-primary literature (eg, review articles), non–peer-reviewed studies, and conference proceedings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane’s tool for Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2), the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). Results: Of 4297 studies reviewed with title and abstract, 4160 were excluded. Of the remaining 137 studies that underwent full-text review, 122 were excluded using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 15 studies were included. Our review indicates a variable but positive impact of psychosocial interventions, such as pre-operative education, relaxation techniques, and cognitive-behavioral therapy, on post-TKA pain. Of the 15 included studies, 9 studies found that psychosocial interventions reduced post-TKA pain. Our review also suggests that cognitive-behavioral therapy may aid in reducing kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, and knee pain intensity. For the 12 randomized studies, the risk of bias was deemed “high” concerns for 3 studies, “some” concerns for 5 studies, and “low” concerns for 4 studies. For the 3 non-randomized studies, the risk of bias was deemed “moderate” due to confounding bias. Conclusions: This systematic review of level-I and level-II studies found that the integration of psychosocial interventions into care protocols for TKA offers benefits including improved patient satisfaction and quality of life and reduced health care costs. Limitations include heterogeneity in intervention types and outcomes measured and the varying levels of risk of bias across studies, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. The findings support a broader adoption of holistic, patient-centered approaches in pain management after TKA, emphasizing the importance of psychological well-being for optimal patient outcomes. However, the evidence is limited and constitutes a strong impetus for the further study of these interventions.
减轻全膝关节置换术后疼痛的社会心理干预:系统回顾
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗终末期骨关节炎患者的常用手术疗法。虽然全膝关节置换术一般都很有效,但相当多的患者在手术后会出现慢性疼痛。社会心理干预已逐渐成为手术后疼痛治疗的一个关注领域。目的:我们旨在评估术前、围手术期和术后社会心理干预对降低 TKA 术后慢性疼痛发生可能性的影响。方法:我们按照科克伦指南和系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单进行了系统综述。我们使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心进行了全面的检索。纳入标准为:(1) 接受治疗的患者;(2) 术后疼痛结果评估≥1个月;(3) 前瞻性和纵向研究设计(例如,随机对照试验、实验性非随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究,在结果出现前测量暴露量);(4) 英语;以及 (5) 社会心理干预(认知行为、生物心理社会、辩证行为、心理教育、正念、冥想、心理治疗、放松、身心疗法、催眠)。排除标准为非主要文献(如综述文章)、未经同行评审的研究以及会议论文集。纳入研究的方法学质量采用 Cochrane 的偏倚风险工具 2 (RoB 2)、非随机研究的方法学指数 (MINORS) 和干预措施非随机研究的偏倚风险 (ROBINS-I) 进行评估。结果:在 4297 项有标题和摘要的研究中,有 4160 项被排除。在其余 137 项进行全文审查的研究中,有 122 项采用相同的纳入和排除标准被排除,15 项研究被纳入。我们的综述显示,术前教育、放松技巧和认知行为疗法等社会心理干预对 TKA 术后疼痛的影响各不相同,但都具有积极意义。在纳入的 15 项研究中,9 项研究发现社会心理干预可减轻 TKA 术后疼痛。我们的综述还表明,认知行为疗法可能有助于减轻运动恐惧、疼痛灾难化和膝关节疼痛强度。在 12 项随机研究中,3 项研究的偏倚风险被视为 "高",5 项研究的偏倚风险被视为 "一些",4 项研究的偏倚风险被视为 "低"。对于 3 项非随机研究,由于存在混杂偏倚,其偏倚风险被视为 "中度"。结论这项对 I 级和 II 级研究的系统性回顾发现,将社会心理干预纳入 TKA 护理方案可带来诸多益处,包括提高患者满意度和生活质量以及降低医疗成本。研究的局限性包括干预类型和测量结果的异质性,以及不同研究的偏倚风险程度不同,这可能会影响研究结果的推广性。研究结果支持在 TKA 术后疼痛治疗中更广泛地采用以患者为中心的整体方法,强调心理健康对患者获得最佳治疗效果的重要性。然而,这些证据是有限的,这为进一步研究这些干预措施提供了强大的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信