Assessing Healthy Vaccinee Bias in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies: A National Cohort Study in Qatar

H. Chemaitelly, H. Ayoub, P. Coyle, P. Tang, M. R. Hasan, H. Yassine, A. Althani, Z. Al-Kanaani, E. Al-Kuwari, A. Jeremijenko, A. Kaleeckal, A. Latif, R. Shaik, H. Abdul-Rahim, G. Nasrallah, M. G. Al-Kuwari, H. Al-Romaihi, M. Al-Thani, A. Al-Khal, R. Bertollini, A. A. Butt, L. Abu-Raddad
{"title":"Assessing Healthy Vaccinee Bias in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies: A National Cohort Study in Qatar","authors":"H. Chemaitelly, H. Ayoub, P. Coyle, P. Tang, M. R. Hasan, H. Yassine, A. Althani, Z. Al-Kanaani, E. Al-Kuwari, A. Jeremijenko, A. Kaleeckal, A. Latif, R. Shaik, H. Abdul-Rahim, G. Nasrallah, M. G. Al-Kuwari, H. Al-Romaihi, M. Al-Thani, A. Al-Khal, R. Bertollini, A. A. Butt, L. Abu-Raddad","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.28.24311115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study investigated the presence of the healthy vaccinee bias in two COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies, involving primary series and booster vaccinations, as well as its temporal patterns and variability across different subpopulations, by examining the association between COVID-19 vaccination and non-COVID-19 mortality in Qatar. Methods: Two matched, retrospective cohort studies assessed the incidence of non-COVID-19 death in national cohorts of individuals with a primary series vaccination versus no vaccination (two-dose analysis), and individuals with three-dose (booster) vaccination versus primary series vaccination (three-dose analysis), from January 5, 2021, to April 9, 2024. Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-COVID-19 death was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) in the two-dose analysis and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.67-1.07) in the three-dose analysis. In the first six months of follow-up in the two-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.27-0.46); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19-1.94). In the first six months of follow-up in the three-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.20-0.50); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.02-1.85). The overall effectiveness of the primary series and third-dose vaccinations against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.0-97.1) and 34.1% (95% CI: -46.4-76.7), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the healthy vaccinee bias is pronounced among those aged 50 years and older and among those more clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Conclusion: A strong healthy vaccinee bias was observed in the first six months following vaccination. This bias may have stemmed from a lower likelihood of vaccination among seriously ill, end-of-life individuals, and less mobile elderly populations. Despite this bias, vaccination provided strong protection against severe COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.28.24311115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the presence of the healthy vaccinee bias in two COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies, involving primary series and booster vaccinations, as well as its temporal patterns and variability across different subpopulations, by examining the association between COVID-19 vaccination and non-COVID-19 mortality in Qatar. Methods: Two matched, retrospective cohort studies assessed the incidence of non-COVID-19 death in national cohorts of individuals with a primary series vaccination versus no vaccination (two-dose analysis), and individuals with three-dose (booster) vaccination versus primary series vaccination (three-dose analysis), from January 5, 2021, to April 9, 2024. Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-COVID-19 death was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) in the two-dose analysis and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.67-1.07) in the three-dose analysis. In the first six months of follow-up in the two-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.27-0.46); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19-1.94). In the first six months of follow-up in the three-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.20-0.50); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.02-1.85). The overall effectiveness of the primary series and third-dose vaccinations against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.0-97.1) and 34.1% (95% CI: -46.4-76.7), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the healthy vaccinee bias is pronounced among those aged 50 years and older and among those more clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Conclusion: A strong healthy vaccinee bias was observed in the first six months following vaccination. This bias may have stemmed from a lower likelihood of vaccination among seriously ill, end-of-life individuals, and less mobile elderly populations. Despite this bias, vaccination provided strong protection against severe COVID-19.
评估 COVID-19 疫苗有效性研究中的健康疫苗接种者偏差:卡塔尔全国队列研究
背景:本研究通过考察卡塔尔 COVID-19 疫苗接种与非 COVID-19 死亡率之间的关系,调查了两项 COVID-19 疫苗有效性研究(涉及初免和加强免疫)中是否存在健康接种者偏倚,以及其在不同亚人群中的时间模式和变异性。方法:两项匹配的回顾性队列研究评估了从 2021 年 1 月 5 日到 2024 年 4 月 9 日期间接种一次初级系列疫苗与未接种疫苗(两剂分析)以及接种三剂(加强型)疫苗与接种一次初级系列疫苗(三剂分析)的全国队列中非 COVID-19 死亡的发生率。结果在两剂分析中,非 COVID-19 死亡的调整危险比 (aHR) 为 0.76(95% CI:0.64-0.90),在三剂分析中为 0.85(95% CI:0.67-1.07)。在两剂分析中,随访前六个月的 aHR 为 0.35(95% CI:0.27-0.46);然而,对随后所有时间段的合并分析显示,aHR 为 1.52(95% CI:1.19-1.94)。在三剂分析的前六个月随访中,aHR 为 0.31(95% CI:0.20-0.50);然而,对随后所有时间段的合并分析显示,aHR 为 1.37(95% CI:1.02-1.85)。接种第一针和第三针疫苗对严重、危重或致命COVID-19的总体有效率分别为95.9%(95% CI:94.0-97.1)和34.1%(95% CI:-46.4-76.7)。亚组分析表明,健康疫苗接种者偏差在 50 岁及以上人群和临床上更易感染严重 COVID-19 的人群中非常明显。结论:在接种疫苗后的头六个月中观察到了强烈的健康接种者偏倚。这种偏差可能是由于重病患者、临终者和行动不便的老年人群接种疫苗的可能性较低。尽管存在这种偏差,接种疫苗仍能有效预防严重的 COVID-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信